Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Will C. Meilander
dblp:89/3302
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Parallel and multicore computing · 39% High-performance computing · 30% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 30% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Parallel and multicore computing
array processor |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Array processor supercomputers · Proc. IEEE 1989 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
SIMD |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Array processor supercomputers · Proc. IEEE 1989 |
High-performance computing
supercomputing |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Array processor supercomputers · Proc. IEEE 1989 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel algorithms
graph algorithms |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Array processor supercomputers · Proc. IEEE 1989 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
parallel algorithm design · 0.0SIMD architecture · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Comparisons of air traffic control implementations on an associative processor with a MIMD and consequences for parallel computing
Man (Mike) Yuan, Johnnie W. Baker, Will C. Meilander |
J. Parallel Distributed Comput. | 3 |
| 2001 | Predictability for Real-Time Command and ControlabstractThis paper describes a new and different paradigm for real-time command and control that we show can provide a static, polynomial-time scheduling algorithm. Current efforts in real-time scheduling have been unable to predict system performance, and use a unpredictable "dynamic" scheduling algorithm. The Nation's Air Traffic Control (ATC) System has been unable to satisfy performance requirements, and is extremely expensive. An editorial in "USA Today" (419 -1999) cites expenditures in ATC at $41 billion. But, current multiprocessor technology cannot do the job. Will C. Meilander, Johnnie W. Baker, Jerry L. Potter |
IPDPS | 1 |
| 1989 | Array processor supercomputersabstractThe authors describe the range of hardware variations of array processors, a form of SIMD (simple instruction stream, multiple dates stream architecture), comparing and contrasting the significant differences among them and briefly illustrating the wide range of algorithms that can effectively utilize them. Three applications are reviewed. The first application, image convolution, represents the traditional numerically computationally intensive areas of application. SIMD array processors are sufficiently powerful to process digital imagery in real time easily. The second application, an example of real-time database management, is the air traffic control problem. The problem cannot be solved today by networks of computers that are successfully used in similar, less time-critical applications. With an array processor there is sufficient real time remaining after the present system tasks are accomplished to realize additional system enhancements. The third application area, graph algorithms, which is more theoretical, is representative of problems for which the simplicity of the array processor solution results in an execution time better than the best theoretical case for a conventional sequential implementation.> Jerry L. Potter, Will C. Meilander |
Proc. IEEE | 2 |