VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jin Hyung Lee
dblp:89/4227
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model |
0.7 | 2 | 2020 | Neural Clustering Processes · ICML 2020 YASS: Yet Another Spike Sorter · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Neural Clustering Processes · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
clustering |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Neural Clustering Processes · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
mixture model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Neural Clustering Processes · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › clustering
neural clustering |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Neural Clustering Processes · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
posterior inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Neural Clustering Processes · ICML 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics › neural data analysis
spike sorting |
0.4 | 2 | 2020 | YASS: Yet Another Spike Sorter · NIPS 2017 Neural Clustering Processes · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian nonparametric model
dirichlet process mixture model |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | YASS: Yet Another Spike Sorter · NIPS 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | YASS: Yet Another Spike Sorter · NIPS 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
neuroscience |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Neural Clustering Processes · ICML 2020 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator
neural network accelerator |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | YASS: Yet Another Spike Sorter · NIPS 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deep network · 0.9amortized inference · 0.9neural network detection · 0.9matching pursuit deconvolution · 0.9coreset · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Nonlinear Decoding of Natural Images From Large-Scale Primate Retinal Ganglion RecordingsabstractDecoding sensory stimuli from neural activity can provide insight into how the nervous system might interpret the physical environment, and facilitates the development of brain-machine interfaces. Nevertheless, the neural decoding problem remains a significant open challenge. Here, we present an efficient nonlinear decoding approach for inferring natural scene stimuli from the spiking activities of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). Our approach uses neural networks to improve on existing decoders in both accuracy and scalability. Trained and validated on real retinal spike data from more than 1000 simultaneously recorded macaque RGC units, the decoder demonstrates the necessity of nonlinear computations for accurate decoding of the fine structures of visual stimuli. Specifically, high-pass spatial features of natural images can only be decoded using nonlinear techniques, while low-pass features can be extracted equally well by linear and nonlinear methods. Together, these results advance the state of the art in decoding natural stimuli from large populations of neurons. Nora Brackbill, Eleanor Batty, Jin Hyung Lee, Catalin Mitelut, William Tong, E. J. Chichilnisky, Liam Paninski |
Neural Comput. | 4 |
| 2020 | Neural Clustering ProcessesabstractProbabilistic clustering models (or equivalently, mixture models) are basic building blocks in countless statistical models and involve latent random variables over discrete spaces. For these models, posterior inference methods can be inaccurate and/or very slow. In this work we introduce deep network architectures trained with labeled samples from any generative model of clustered datasets. At test time, the networks generate approximate posterior samples of cluster labels for any new dataset of arbitrary size. We develop two complementary approaches to this task, requiring either O(N) or O(K) network forward passes per dataset, where N is the dataset size and K the number of clusters. Unlike previous approaches, our methods sample the labels of all the data points from a well-defined posterior, and can learn nonparametric Bayesian posteriors since they do not limit the number of mixture components. As a scientific application, we present a novel approach to neural spike sorting for high-density multielectrode arrays. Ari Pakman, Catalin Mitelut, Jin Hyung Lee, Liam Paninski |
ICML | 4 |
| 2017 | YASS: Yet Another Spike SorterabstractSpike sorting is a critical first step in extracting neural signals from large-scale electrophysiological data. This manuscript describes an efficient, reliable pipeline for spike sorting on dense multi-electrode arrays (MEAs), where neural signals appear across many electrodes and spike sorting currently represents a major computational bottleneck. We present several new techniques that make dense MEA spike sorting more robust and scalable. Our pipeline is based on an efficient multi-stage ''triage-then-cluster-then-pursuit'' approach that initially extracts only clean, high-quality waveforms from the electrophysiological time series by temporarily skipping noisy or ''collided'' events (representing two neurons firing synchronously). This is accomplished by developing a neural network detection method followed by efficient outlier triaging. The clean waveforms are then used to infer the set of neural spike waveform templates through nonparametric Bayesian clustering. Our clustering approach adapts a ''coreset'' approach for data reduction and uses efficient inference methods in a Dirichlet process mixture model framework to dramatically improve the scalability and reliability of the entire pipeline. The ''triaged'' waveforms are then finally recovered with matching-pursuit deconvolution techniques. The proposed methods improve on the state-of-the-art in terms of accuracy and stability on both real and biophysically-realistic simulated MEA data. Furthermore, the proposed pipeline is efficient, learning templates and clustering faster than real-time for a 500-electrode dataset, largely on a single CPU core. Jin Hyung Lee, David E. Carlson, Hooshmand Shokri Razaghi, Weichi Yao, Georges Goetz, Espen Hagen, Eleanor Batty, E. J. Chichilnisky, Gaute T. Einevoll, Liam Paninski |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2011 | SNR Dependence of Optimal Parameters for Apparent Diffusion Coefficient MeasurementsabstractOptimizing the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) parameters (i.e., the b-value and the number of image averages) to the tissue of interest is essential for producing high-quality apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. Previous investigation of this optimization was performed assuming Gaussian noise statistics for the ADC map, which is only valid for high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) imaging. In this work, the true statistics of the noise in ADC maps are derived, followed by an optimization of the DWI parameters as a function of the imaging SNR. Specifically, it is demonstrated that the optimum b-value is a monotonically increasing function of the imaging SNR, which converges to the optimum b-value from previously proposed approaches for high-SNR cases, while exhibiting a significant deviation from this asymptote for low-SNR situations. Incorporating the effects of T(2) weighting further increases the SNR dependence of the optimal parameters. The proposed optimization scheme is particularly important for high-resolution DWI, which intrinsically suffers from low SNR and therefore cannot afford the use of the conventional high b-values. Comparison scans were performed for high-resolution DWI of the spinal cord, demonstrating the improvements in the resulting images and the ADC maps achieved by this method. Emine Ulku Saritas, Jin Hyung Lee, Dwight G. Nishimura |
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging | 2 |