VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nuaman Asbeh
dblp:89/4271
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50% Representation and self-supervised learning · 50% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal discovery |
0.5 | 2 | 2016 | Learning Latent Variable Models by Pairwise Cluster Comparison: Part II - Algorithm and Evaluation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 Learning Latent Variable Models by Pairwise Cluster Comparison: Part I - Theory and Overview · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › latent representation learning
latent variable discovery |
0.5 | 2 | 2016 | Learning Latent Variable Models by Pairwise Cluster Comparison: Part II - Algorithm and Evaluation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 Learning Latent Variable Models by Pairwise Cluster Comparison: Part I - Theory and Overview · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.5 | 2 | 2016 | Learning Latent Variable Models by Pairwise Cluster Comparison: Part II - Algorithm and Evaluation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 Learning Latent Variable Models by Pairwise Cluster Comparison: Part I - Theory and Overview · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
constraint-based causal discovery · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Learning Latent Variable Models by Pairwise Cluster Comparison: Part I - Theory and OverviewabstractIdentification of latent variables that govern a problem and the relationships among them, given measurements in the observed world, are important for causal discovery. This identification can be accomplished by analyzing the constraints imposed by the latents in the measurements. We introduce the concept of pairwise cluster comparison (PCC) to identify causal relationships from clusters of data points and provide a two- stage algorithm called learning PCC (LPCC) that learns a latent variable model (LVM) using PCC. First, LPCC learns exogenous latents and latent colliders, as well as their observed descendants, by using pairwise comparisons between data clusters in the measurement space that may explain latent causes. Since in this first stage LPCC cannot distinguish endogenous latent non-colliders from their exogenous ancestors, a second stage is needed to extract the former, with their observed children, from the latter. If the true graph has no serial connections, LPCC returns the true graph, and if the true graph has a serial connection, LPCC returns a pattern of the true graph. LPCC's most important advantage is that it is not limited to linear or latent-tree models and makes only mild assumptions about the distribution. The paper is divided in two parts: Part I (this paper) provides the necessary preliminaries, theoretical foundation to PCC, and an overview of LPCC; Part II formally introduces the LPCC algorithm and experimentally evaluates its merit in different synthetic and real domains. The code for the LPCC algorithm and data sets used in the experiments reported in Part II are available online. Nuaman Asbeh, Boaz Lerner |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2016 | Learning Latent Variable Models by Pairwise Cluster Comparison: Part II - Algorithm and EvaluationabstractIt is important for causal discovery to identify any latent variables that govern a problem and the relationships among them, given measurements in the observed world. In Part I of this paper, we were interested in learning a discrete latent variable model (LVM) and introduced the concept of pairwise cluster comparison (PCC) to identify causal relationships from clusters of data points and an overview of a two-stage algorithm for learning PCC (LPCC). First, LPCC learns exogenous latent variables and latent colliders, as well as their observed descendants, by using pairwise comparisons between data clusters in the measurement space that may explain latent causes. Second, LPCC identifies endogenous latent non- colliders with their observed children. In Part I, we showed that if the true graph has no serial connections, then LPCC returns the true graph, and if the true graph has a serial connection, then LPCC returns a pattern of the true graph. In this paper (Part II), we formally introduce the LPCC algorithm that implements the PCC concept. In addition, we thoroughly evaluate LPCC using simulated and real-world data sets in comparison to state-of-the-art algorithms. Besides using three real-world data sets, which have already been tested in learning an LVM, we also evaluate the algorithms using data sets that represent two original problems. The first problem is identifying young drivers' involvement in road accidents, and the second is identifying cellular subpopulations of the immune system from mass cytometry. The results of our evaluation show that LPCC improves in accuracy with the sample size, can learn large LVMs, and is accurate in learning compared to state-of- the-art algorithms. The code for the LPCC algorithm and data sets used in the experiments reported here are available online. Nuaman Asbeh, Boaz Lerner |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2009 | Onto-clust - A methodology for combining clustering analysis and ontological methods for identifying groups of comorbidities for developmental disorders
Mor Peleg, Nuaman Asbeh, Tsvi Kuflik, Mitchell Schertz |
J. Biomed. Informatics | 2 |