Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

L. Douglas Baker

dblp:89/454 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot navigation and mapping · 91% 3D vision · 9%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › state estimation › trajectory estimation
continuous-time trajectory estimation
0.212014
Continuous trajectory estimation for 3D SLAM from actuated lidar · ICRA 2014
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › SLAM › 3D SLAM
LiDAR SLAM
0.212014
Continuous trajectory estimation for 3D SLAM from actuated lidar · ICRA 2014
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
SLAM
0.212014
Continuous trajectory estimation for 3D SLAM from actuated lidar · ICRA 2014
Computer vision › 3D vision
point cloud registration
0.112014
Continuous trajectory estimation for 3D SLAM from actuated lidar · ICRA 2014
Data mining
clustering
0.011998
Distributional Clustering of Words for Text Classification · SIGIR 1998
Data mining › clustering › probabilistic clustering
distribution clustering
0.011998
Distributional Clustering of Words for Text Classification · SIGIR 1998
Data mining › text mining
text classification
0.011998
Distributional Clustering of Words for Text Classification · SIGIR 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

iterative closest point · 0.2basis function representation · 0.2mutual information feature selection · 0.0latent semantic indexing · 0.0distributional clustering · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Continuous trajectory estimation for 3D SLAM from actuated lidar
abstract
We extend the Iterative Closest Point (ICP) algorithm to obtain a method for continuous-time trajectory estimation (CICP) suitable for SLAM from actuated lidar. Traditional solutions to SLAM from actuated lidar rely heavily on the accuracy of an auxiliary pose sensor to form rigid frames. These frames are then used with ICP to obtain accurate pose estimates. However, since lidar records a single range sample at time, any error in inter-sample sensor motion must be accounted for. This is not possible if the frame is treated as a rigid point cloud. In this work, instead of ICP we estimate a continuous-time trajectory that takes into account inter-sample pose errors. The trajectory is represented as a linear combination of basis functions and formulated as a solution to a (sparse) linear system without restrictive assumptions on sensor motion. We evaluate the algorithm on synthetic and real data and show improved accuracy in open-loop SLAM in comparison to state-of-the-art rigid registration methods.
Hatem Alismail, L. Douglas Baker, Brett Browning
ICRA2
1998 Distributional Clustering of Words for Text Classification
abstract
This paper describes the application of Distributional Clustering [20] to document classification. This approach clusters words into groups based on the distribution of class labels associated with each word. Thus, unlike some other unsupervised dimensionalityreduction techniques, such as Latent Semantic Indexing, we are able to compress the feature space much more aggressively, while still maintaining high document classification accuracy. Experimental results obtained on three real-world data sets show that we can reduce the feature dimensionality by three orders of magnitude and lose only 2% accuracy---significantly better than Latent Semantic Indexing [6], class-based clustering [1], feature selection by mutual information [23], or Markov-blanket-based feature selection [13]. We also show that less aggressive clustering sometimes results in improved classification accuracy over classification without clustering. 1 Introduction The popularity of the Internet has caused an exponent...
L. Douglas Baker, Andrew McCallum
SIGIR1
1992 Using Gateways To Build A Route Map
David Kortenkamp, L. Douglas Baker, Terry E. Weymouth
IROS2