Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jinglin Chen

dblp:89/5737 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
5as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 5 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
9 papers
Reinforcement learning · 72% Efficient and distributed learning · 11% Learning theory · 8%

Topics — the 22 heaviest of 25, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration
1.832024
Model-Free Representation Learning and Exploration in Low-Rank MDPs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
On the Statistical Efficiency of Reward-Free Exploration in Non-Linear RL · NeurIPS 2022
Improved Worst-Case Regret Bounds for Randomized Least-Squares Value Iteration · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process
low-rank MDP
1.422024
Model-Free Representation Learning and Exploration in Low-Rank MDPs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Reinforcement Learning in Low-rank MDPs with Density Features · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration › exploration in markov decision processes
reward-free exploration
1.322024
Model-Free Representation Learning and Exploration in Low-Rank MDPs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
On the Statistical Efficiency of Reward-Free Exploration in Non-Linear RL · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning
1.022023
Reinforcement Learning in Low-rank MDPs with Density Features · ICML 2023
Information-Theoretic Considerations in Batch Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
1.022022
On the Statistical Efficiency of Reward-Free Exploration in Non-Linear RL · NeurIPS 2022
Information-Theoretic Considerations in Batch Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference acceleration
0.912025
Faster In-Context Learning for LLMs via N-Gram Trie Speculative Decoding · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › inference acceleration
speculative decoding
0.912025
Faster In-Context Learning for LLMs via N-Gram Trie Speculative Decoding · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation
representation learning for reinforcement learning
0.712023
Reinforcement Learning in Low-rank MDPs with Density Features · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
function approximation
0.612022
On the Statistical Efficiency of Reward-Free Exploration in Non-Linear RL · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation
non-linear function approximation
0.612022
On the Statistical Efficiency of Reward-Free Exploration in Non-Linear RL · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › sample efficiency
sample-efficient reinforcement learning
0.612022
Towards Deployment-Efficient Reinforcement Learning: Lower Bound and Optimality · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value function approximation
randomized least-squares value iteration
0.512021
Improved Worst-Case Regret Bounds for Randomized Least-Squares Value Iteration · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
randomized value functions
0.512021
Improved Worst-Case Regret Bounds for Randomized Least-Squares Value Iteration · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
regret minimization
0.512021
Improved Worst-Case Regret Bounds for Randomized Least-Squares Value Iteration · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
thompson sampling
0.512021
Improved Worst-Case Regret Bounds for Randomized Least-Squares Value Iteration · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory › finite-sample analysis
finite-sample guarantees
0.412019
Information-Theoretic Considerations in Batch Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization
0.412019
Accelerating Nonconvex Learning via Replica Exchange Langevin diffusion · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value function approximation
0.412019
Information-Theoretic Considerations in Batch Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference
0.312018
Efficient Localized Inference for Large Graphical Models · IJCAI 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.312018
Efficient Localized Inference for Large Graphical Models · IJCAI 2018
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning
0.312025
Faster In-Context Learning for LLMs via N-Gram Trie Speculative Decoding · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process › finite markov decision processes
tabular markov decision process
0.112021
Improved Worst-Case Regret Bounds for Randomized Least-Squares Value Iteration · AAAI 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

n-gram trie · 0.9drafting · 0.9model-free RL · 0.8minimax representation learning · 0.8function approximation · 0.8level-by-level exploration · 0.7density features · 0.7structural assumptions · 0.6lower bound analysis · 0.6OLIVE algorithm · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Faster In-Context Learning for LLMs via N-Gram Trie Speculative Decoding
abstract
As a crucial method in prompt engineering, In-Context Learning (ICL) enhances the generalization and knowledge utilization capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) (Dong et al., 2024).However, the lengthy retrieved contexts and limited token throughput in autoregressive models significantly constrain reasoning speed.To address this challenge, we propose N-Gram Trie Speculative Decoding, a novel approach that leverages the overlap between context and model output.This method constructs an n-gram trie from the context to generate drafts, accelerating token generation for LLMs.We evaluate our approach on summarization, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), and contextbased Question Answering (QA) tasks.Experimental results on Vicuna-7B, Llama2-7B-Chat, and Llama3-8B-Instruct demonstrate substantial speed improvements without compromising accuracy.Compared with various strong baselines, our method achieves the highest mean speedup, showcasing its effectiveness and efficiency.Our implement code is available here: https://github.com/mrlife219/Ngram-Trie.
Jinglin Chen, Qiwei Li 0002, Zuchao Li, Baoyuan Qi, Guoming Liu, Haojun Ai, Hai Zhao 0001, Ping Wang 0028
EMNLP1
2024 Model-Free Representation Learning and Exploration in Low-Rank MDPs
abstract
The low-rank MDP has emerged as an important model for studying representation learning and exploration in reinforcement learning. With a known representation, several model-free exploration strategies exist. In contrast, all algorithms for the unknown representation setting are model-based, thereby requiring the ability to model the full dynamics. In this work, we present the first model-free representation learning algorithms for low-rank MDPs. The key algorithmic contribution is a new minimax representation learning objective, for which we provide variants with differing tradeoffs in their statistical and computational properties. We interleave this representation learning step with an exploration strategy to cover the state space in a reward-free manner. The resulting algorithms are provably sample efficient and can accommodate general function approximation to scale to complex environments.
Aditya Modi 0002, Jinglin Chen, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Nan Jiang 0008, Alekh Agarwal
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2023 Reinforcement Learning in Low-rank MDPs with Density Features
abstract
MDPs with low-rank transitions---that is, the transition matrix can be factored into the product of two matrices, left and right---is a highly representative structure that enables tractable learning. The left matrix enables expressive function approximation for value-based learning and has been studied extensively. In this work, we instead investigate sample-efficient learning with density features, i.e., the right matrix, which induce powerful models for state-occupancy distributions. This setting not only sheds light on leveraging unsupervised learning in RL, but also enables plug-in solutions for settings like convex RL. In the offline setting, we propose an algorithm for off-policy estimation of occupancies that can handle non-exploratory data. Using this as a subroutine, we further devise an online algorithm that constructs exploratory data distributions in a level-by-level manner. As a central technical challenge, the additive error of occupancy estimation is incompatible with the multiplicative definition of data coverage. In the absence of strong assumptions like reachability, this incompatibility easily leads to exponential error blow-up, which we overcome via novel technical tools. Our results also readily extend to the representation learning setting, when the density features are unknown and must be learned from an exponentially large candidate set.
Audrey Huang, Jinglin Chen, Nan Jiang 0008
ICML2
2022 Towards Deployment-Efficient Reinforcement Learning: Lower Bound and Optimality
Jinglin Chen, Li Zhao 0007, Tao Qin 0001, Nan Jiang 0008, Tie-Yan Liu
ICLR2
2022 On the Statistical Efficiency of Reward-Free Exploration in Non-Linear RL
abstract
We study reward-free reinforcement learning (RL) under general non-linear function approximation, and establish sample efficiency and hardness results under various standard structural assumptions. On the positive side, we propose the RFOLIVE (Reward-Free OLIVE) algorithm for sample-efficient reward-free exploration under minimal structural assumptions, which covers the previously studied settings of linear MDPs (Jin et al., 2020b), linear completeness (Zanette et al., 2020b) and low-rank MDPs with unknown representation (Modi et al., 2021). Our analyses indicate that the explorability or reachability assumptions, previously made for the latter two settings, are not necessary statistically for reward-free exploration. On the negative side, we provide a statistical hardness result for both reward-free and reward-aware exploration under linear completeness assumptions when the underlying features are unknown, showing an exponential separation between low-rank and linear completeness settings.
Jinglin Chen, Aditya Modi 0002, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Nan Jiang 0008, Alekh Agarwal
NeurIPS1
2022 Offline reinforcement learning under value and density-ratio realizability: The power of gaps
abstract
We consider a challenging theoretical problem in offline reinforcement learning (RL): obtaining sample-efficiency guarantees with a dataset lacking sufficient coverage, under only realizability-type assumptions for the function approximators. While the existing theory has addressed learning under realizability and under non-exploratory data separately, no work has been able to address both simultaneously (except for a concurrent work which we compare in detail). Under an additional gap assumption, we provide guarantees to a simple pessimistic algorithm based on a version space formed by marginalized importance sampling (MIS), and the guarantee only requires the data to cover the optimal policy and the function classes to realize the optimal value and density-ratio functions. While similar gap assumptions have been used in other areas of RL theory, our work is the first to identify the utility and the novel mechanism of gap assumptions in offline RL with weak function approximation.
Jinglin Chen, Nan Jiang 0008
UAI1
2021 Improved Worst-Case Regret Bounds for Randomized Least-Squares Value Iteration
abstract
This paper studies regret minimization with randomized value functions in reinforcement learning. In tabular finite-horizon Markov Decision Processes, we introduce a clipping variant of one classical Thompson Sampling (TS)-like algorithm, randomized least-squares value iteration (RLSVI). Our $\tilde{\mathrm{O}}(H^2S\sqrt{AT})$ high-probability worst-case regret bound improves the previous sharpest worst-case regret bounds for RLSVI and matches the existing state-of-the-art worst-case TS-based regret bounds.
Priyank Agrawal, Jinglin Chen, Nan Jiang 0008
AAAI2
2019 Accelerating Nonconvex Learning via Replica Exchange Langevin diffusion
Jinglin Chen, Jing Dong 0007, Jian Peng 0001, Zhaoran Wang 0001
ICLR (Poster)2
2019 Information-Theoretic Considerations in Batch Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Value-function approximation methods that operate in batch mode have foundational importance to reinforcement learning (RL). Finite sample guarantees for these methods often crucially rely on two types of assumptions: (1) mild distribution shift, and (2) representation conditions that are stronger than realizability. However, the necessity (“why do we need them?”) and the naturalness (“when do they hold?”) of such assumptions have largely eluded the literature. In this paper, we revisit these assumptions and provide theoretical results towards answering the above questions, and make steps towards a deeper understanding of value-function approximation.
Jinglin Chen, Nan Jiang 0008
ICML1
2018 Efficient Localized Inference for Large Graphical Models
abstract
We propose a new localized inference algorithm for answering marginalization queries in large graphical models with the correlation decay property. Given a query variable and a large graphical model, we define a much smaller model in a local region around the query variable in the target model so that the marginal distribution of the query variable can be accurately approximated. We introduce two approximation error bounds based on the Dobrushin’s comparison theorem and apply our bounds to derive a greedy expansion algorithm that efficiently guides the selection of neighbor nodes for localized inference. We verify our theoretical bounds on various datasets and demonstrate that our localized inference algorithm can provide fast and accurate approximation for large graphical models.
Jinglin Chen, Jian Peng 0001, Qiang Liu 0001
IJCAI1
2008 DTAD: A Dynamic Taint Analysis Detector for Information Security
abstract
Information infection and information leakage in computer systems are mainly caused by insecure network access. Considering the particularity of network security, a tool DTAD (dynamic taint analysis detector) for information flow security detection is designed and implemented, aiming at the problem of data security in network access. This tool performs log recording and state controlling for malicious access and virus vulnerability using the state-control characteristic of virtual machines. Defense systems capture network data by executing applications to determine whether these accesses (i.e. target jumping, function address and instruction access) are legitimate or not. Once an attack is detected, the tool records states of the virtual machine at the process level as well as the kernel level. For attacks caused by malicious code, the tool injects its own diagnostic code into the process space of running programs to substitute the malicious code, as a result, related information for the attacked process is collected. The tool is able to generate precise signatures for network intrusion detection by associating and comparing network data recorded in log files with process information collected by the virtual machine, the whole process is finished automatically. The tool can also precisely identify attack types and provide effective protection measures through fast signature releasing. Experiments have validated the efficiency of the tool in attack recognition and information protection, and indicated that this detection and protection system is effective in recognizing, tracking and processing taint data.
Zhiwen Bai, Jinglin Chen
WAIM3