Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Krishnan Pillaipakkamnatt

dblp:89/686 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorTheory of computation · 3 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Learning theory · 100%
Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Computational complexity · 54% Logic in computer science · 46%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory
exact learning
0.021996
How Many Queries Are Needed to Learn? · J. ACM 1996
How many queries are needed to learn? · STOC 1995
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory
learnability
0.011995
Read-Twice DNF Formulas are Properly Learnable · Inf. Comput. 1995
Logic in computer science › propositional logic
boolean formula
0.011995
Read-Twice DNF Formulas are Properly Learnable · Inf. Comput. 1995
Logic in computer science › propositional logic › boolean formula
disjunctive normal form
0.011995
Read-Twice DNF Formulas are Properly Learnable · Inf. Comput. 1995
Machine learning › Learning theory
PAC learning
0.011994
On the Limits of Proper Learnability of Subclasses of DNF Formulas · COLT 1994
Machine learning › Learning theory › PAC learning
proper learning
0.011994
On the Limits of Proper Learnability of Subclasses of DNF Formulas · COLT 1994
Computational complexity › boolean function complexity
DNF formulas
0.011994
On the Limits of Proper Learnability of Subclasses of DNF Formulas · COLT 1994
Computational complexity › complexity classes
P vs NP
0.011996
How Many Queries Are Needed to Learn? · J. ACM 1996

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

membership queries · 0.1equivalence queries · 0.1complexity-theoretic assumptions · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 A New Privacy-Preserving Distributed k-Clustering Algorithm
abstract
We present a simple I/O-efficient k-clustering algorithm that was designed with the goal of enabling a privacy-preserving version of the algorithm. Our experiments show that this algorithm produces cluster centers that are, on average, more accurate than the ones produced by the well known iterative A;-means algorithm. We use our new algorithm as the basis for a communication-efficient privacy-preserving k-clustering protocol for databases that are horizontally partitioned between two parties. Unlike existing privacy-preserving protocols based on the A;-means algorithm, this protocol does not reveal intermediate candidate cluster centers.
Geetha Jagannathan, Krishnan Pillaipakkamnatt, Rebecca N. Wright
SDM2
1997 The Effectiveness of Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Time to Case Disposition
abstract
One of the difficult tasks in the court system is the scheduling of the entities involved at the various stages of the criminal justice system.These include judges, jurors, witnesses, defendants, attorneys and court rooms.In this paper we examine the feasibility of using machine learning techniques for the task of predicting the elapsed time between the arrest of an offender and the final disposition of his or her case.Accurate prediction of time to case disposition will aid in the resolution of conflicts that arise in the scheduling of the above entities.Using a pre-existing dataset called Offender Based Transaction Statistics (1990) and two well-known learning algorithms we show that there is scope for the use of such techniques.
Dawn Wilkins, Krishnan Pillaipakkamnatt
ICAIL2
1996 How Many Queries Are Needed to Learn?
abstract
We investigate the query complexity of exact learning in the membership and (proper) equivalence query model. We give a complete characterization of concept classes that are learnable with a polynomial number of polynomial sized queries in this model. We give applications of this characterization, including results on learning a natural subclass of DNF formulas, and on learning with membership queries alone. Query complexity has previously been used to prove lower bounds on the time complexity of exact learning. We show a new relationship between query complexity and time complexity in exact learning: If any “honest” class is exactly and properly learnable with polynomial query complexity, but not learnable in polynomial time, then P = NP. In particular, we show that an honest class is exactly polynomial-query learnable if and only if it is learnable using an oracle for Γ p 4 .
Lisa Hellerstein, Krishnan Pillaipakkamnatt, Vijay Raghavan 0002, Dawn Wilkins
J. ACM2
1996 On the Limits of Proper Learnability of Subclasses of DNF Formulas
Krishnan Pillaipakkamnatt, Vijay Raghavan 0002
Mach. Learn.1
1995 How many queries are needed to learn?
abstract
We investigate the query complexity of exact learning in the membership and (proper) equivalence query model.We give '
Lisa Hellerstein, Krishnan Pillaipakkamnatt, Vijay Raghavan 0002, Dawn Wilkins
STOC2
1995 Read-Twice DNF Formulas are Properly Learnable
Krishnan Pillaipakkamnatt, Vijay Raghavan 0002
Inf. Comput.1
1994 On the Limits of Proper Learnability of Subclasses of DNF Formulas
abstract
Bshouty, Goldman, Hancock and Matar have shown that up to log n-term DNF formulas can be properly learned in the exact model with equivalence and membership queries. Given standard complexity-theoretical assumptions, we show that this positive result for proper learning cannot be significantly improved in the exact model or the PAC model extended to allow membership queries. Our negative results are derived from two general techniques for proving such results in the exact model and the extended PAC model. As a further application of these techniques, we consider read-thrice DNF formulas. Here we improve on Aizenstein, Hellerstein, and Pitt's negative result for proper learning in the exact model in two ways. First, we show that their assumption of NP ≠ co-NP can be replaced with the weaker assumption of P ≠ NP. Second, we show that read-thrice DNF formulas are not properly learnable in the extended PAC model, assuming RP ≠ NP.
Krishnan Pillaipakkamnatt, Vijay Raghavan 0002
COLT1
1993 A Linear Time Equivalene Test for Read-Twice DNF Formulas
Krishnan Pillaipakkamnatt, Vijay Raghavan 0002
Inf. Process. Lett.1