Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Youfang Pan

dblp:90/1002 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 50% Computational complexity · 25% Algorithms and data structures · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity
average-case complexity
0.011989
Exponential Average Time for the Pure Literal Rule · SIAM J. Comput. 1989
Algorithms and data structures › search algorithms
backtracking
0.011989
Exponential Average Time for the Pure Literal Rule · SIAM J. Comput. 1989
Automated reasoning and model checking
pure literal rule
0.011989
Exponential Average Time for the Pure Literal Rule · SIAM J. Comput. 1989
Automated reasoning and model checking
satisfiability
0.011989
Exponential Average Time for the Pure Literal Rule · SIAM J. Comput. 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lower bound analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1989 Exponential Average Time for the Pure Literal Rule
abstract
This paper gives exponential lower bounds for the average time of an algorithm based on a simplified version of the pure literal rule from the Davis–Putnam procedure. It is shown that this algorithm requires an average time that is exponential in v, the number of variables, when p, the probability that a literal is in a clause, is proportional to $1/v$ and t, the number of clauses in the predicate, is at least a linear function of v. The time is greater than any polynomial in v over a somewhat larger range of parameters. For the two cases $t = \Theta (\ln v)$ and $p = O(\ln v/v^{3/2} )$, the results of this lower-bound analysis are the same (to within a constant factor) as the upper-bound results in [SIAM J. Comput., 14 (1985), pp. 943–953]. The results of this and other papers show that the fastest analyzed algorithm for random satisfiability problems depends on the parameters of the distribution. Backtracking, the pure literal rule, and the new algorithm of Iwama [Report KSU/ICS 88-01, Institute of Computer Science, Kayoto Sangyo University, Kyoto, Japan, 1988 each have a large region of parameter setting where it is exponentially faster than the other two.
Khaled M. Bugrara, Youfang Pan, Paul Walton Purdom Jr.
SIAM J. Comput.2