Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Youfang Pan
dblp:90/1002
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 50% Computational complexity · 25% Algorithms and data structures · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational complexity
average-case complexity |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Exponential Average Time for the Pure Literal Rule · SIAM J. Comput. 1989 |
Algorithms and data structures › search algorithms
backtracking |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Exponential Average Time for the Pure Literal Rule · SIAM J. Comput. 1989 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
pure literal rule |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Exponential Average Time for the Pure Literal Rule · SIAM J. Comput. 1989 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
satisfiability |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Exponential Average Time for the Pure Literal Rule · SIAM J. Comput. 1989 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
lower bound analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1989 | Exponential Average Time for the Pure Literal RuleabstractThis paper gives exponential lower bounds for the average time of an algorithm based on a simplified version of the pure literal rule from the Davis–Putnam procedure. It is shown that this algorithm requires an average time that is exponential in v, the number of variables, when p, the probability that a literal is in a clause, is proportional to $1/v$ and t, the number of clauses in the predicate, is at least a linear function of v. The time is greater than any polynomial in v over a somewhat larger range of parameters. For the two cases $t = \Theta (\ln v)$ and $p = O(\ln v/v^{3/2} )$, the results of this lower-bound analysis are the same (to within a constant factor) as the upper-bound results in [SIAM J. Comput., 14 (1985), pp. 943–953]. The results of this and other papers show that the fastest analyzed algorithm for random satisfiability problems depends on the parameters of the distribution. Backtracking, the pure literal rule, and the new algorithm of Iwama [Report KSU/ICS 88-01, Institute of Computer Science, Kayoto Sangyo University, Kyoto, Japan, 1988 each have a large region of parameter setting where it is exponentially faster than the other two. Khaled M. Bugrara, Youfang Pan, Paul Walton Purdom Jr. |
SIAM J. Comput. | 2 |