Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xudong Liu 0008

dblp:90/2144-8 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-8727-1855ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Cloud and datacenter computing · 52% Distributed systems · 26% Performance modeling and evaluation · 22%
Computer networks
1 paper
Edge and fog computing · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › edge computing
cloud-edge collaboration
1.012026
Hybrid Orchestration of AI Services and Microservices in Cloud-Edge Collaboration · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2026
Cloud and datacenter computing
cluster resource management and scheduling
1.012026
Hybrid Orchestration of AI Services and Microservices in Cloud-Edge Collaboration · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2026
Cloud and datacenter computing
edge and fog computing
1.012026
Hybrid Orchestration of AI Services and Microservices in Cloud-Edge Collaboration · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2026
Edge and fog computing › service orchestration
microservice orchestration
0.912025
Energy-Delay-Aware Joint Microservice Deployment and Request Routing With DVFS in Edge: A Reinforcement Learning Approach · IEEE Trans. Computers 2025
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models
0.622026
Hybrid Orchestration of AI Services and Microservices in Cloud-Edge Collaboration · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2026
Energy-Delay-Aware Joint Microservice Deployment and Request Routing With DVFS in Edge: A Reinforcement Learning Approach · IEEE Trans. Computers 2025
Performance modeling and evaluation › queueing models
queueing network model
0.312025
Energy-Delay-Aware Joint Microservice Deployment and Request Routing With DVFS in Edge: A Reinforcement Learning Approach · IEEE Trans. Computers 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 1.7queuing network model · 1.7dynamic frequency scaling · 1.7reward shaping · 1.0reinforcement learning with action masking · 1.0queuing network · 1.0multi-instance model · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Hybrid Orchestration of AI Services and Microservices in Cloud-Edge Collaboration
abstract
The rapid development of AI accelerates the implementation and delivery of AI applications in diverse fields. In cloud-edge collaboration, delivering a complete AI application relies on the robust coordination between AI-supporting microservices and AI services. However, most existing studies only coarsely considered monolithic AI service orchestration while neglecting microservice orchestration. Such coarse-grained orchestration severely impacts application performance. To enable diverse high-performance AI applications, fine-grained hybrid orchestration of AI services and microservices (HOAIM) is highly desirable, yet presents formidable challenges. Due to heterogeneous services, call dependencies, and service multiplexing, fine-grained hybrid orchestration modeling is highly non-trivial. Moreover, the tight coupling between deployment and routing results in a complex joint optimization problem. To address this, we first propose a heterogeneous service orchestration network that supports orchestration optimization and automated management. Then, based on queuing networks and multi-instance models, we conduct an accurate analysis of delay and load. Furthermore, to achieve efficient hybrid orchestration, we propose preference-driven resource allocation and instance computation algorithms, along with reinforcement learning with action masking and reward shaping. Finally, extensive trace-driven simulations demonstrate that our algorithms optimize average response delay by up to 41.83%, and achieve significant advantages in load balancing, response success rate, and resource efficiency.
Kai Peng 0001, Xudong Liu 0008, Menglan Hu, Chao Cai 0001, Zehui Xiong
IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput.2
2025 Energy-Delay-Aware Joint Microservice Deployment and Request Routing With DVFS in Edge: A Reinforcement Learning Approach
abstract
The emerging microservice architecture offers opportunities for accommodating delay-sensitive applications in edge. However, such applications are computation-intensive and energy-consuming, imposing great difficulties to edge servers with limited computing resources, energy supply, and cooling capabilities. To reduce delay and energy consumption in edge, efficient microservice orchestration is necessary, but significantly challenging. Due to frequent communications among multiple microservices, service deployment and request routing are tightly-coupled, which motivates a complex joint optimization problem. When considering multi-instance modeling and fine-grained orchestration for massive microservices, the difficulty is extremely enlarged. Nevertheless, previous work failed to address the above difficulties. Also, they neglected to balance delay and energy, especially lacking dynamic energy-saving abilities. Therefore, this paper minimizes energy and delay by jointly optimizing microservice deployment and request routing via multi-instance modeling, fine-grained orchestration, and dynamic adaptation. Our queuing network model enables accurate end-to-end time analysis covering queuing, computing, and communicating delays. We then propose a delay-aware reinforcement learning algorithm, which derives the static service deployment and routing decisions. Moreover, we design an energy-aware dynamic frequency scaling algorithm, which saves energy with fluctuating request patterns. Experiment results demonstrate that our approaches significantly outperform baseline algorithms in both delay and energy consumption.
Liangyuan Wang, Xudong Liu 0008, Haonan Ding, Kai Peng 0001, Menglan Hu
IEEE Trans. Computers2