Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jonathan Schug

dblp:90/4599 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0001-6885-7869ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data models and query languages · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › multiple sequence alignment › alignment quality assessment
alignment benchmark
0.112011
Comparative analysis of RNA-Seq alignment algorithms and the RNA-Seq unified mapper (RUM) · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
read mapping
0.112011
Comparative analysis of RNA-Seq alignment algorithms and the RNA-Seq unified mapper (RUM) · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics
RNA-seq analysis
0.112011
Comparative analysis of RNA-Seq alignment algorithms and the RNA-Seq unified mapper (RUM) · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › read mapping
spliced alignment
0.112011
Comparative analysis of RNA-Seq alignment algorithms and the RNA-Seq unified mapper (RUM) · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics › RNA splicing analysis
splice junction detection
0.012011
Comparative analysis of RNA-Seq alignment algorithms and the RNA-Seq unified mapper (RUM) · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological database
gene expression database
0.012001
A relational schema for both array-based and SAGE gene expression experiments · Bioinform. 2001
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis
0.011997
Modeling Transcription Factor Binding Sites with Gibbs Sampling and Minimum Description Length Encoding · ISMB 1997
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
transcription factor binding site prediction
0.011997
Modeling Transcription Factor Binding Sites with Gibbs Sampling and Minimum Description Length Encoding · ISMB 1997
Data models and query languages › relational model
relational schema
0.012001
A relational schema for both array-based and SAGE gene expression experiments · Bioinform. 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.1sanger sequencing · 0.1RT-PCR · 0.1ontology-based sample description · 0.1minimum description length · 0.0gibbs sampling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Defiant: (DMRs: easy, fast, identification and ANnoTation) identifies differentially Methylated regions from iron-deficient rat hippocampus
abstract
BACKGROUND: Identification of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) is the initial step towards the study of DNA methylation-mediated gene regulation. Previous approaches to call DMRs suffer from false prediction, use extreme resources, and/or require library installation and input conversion. RESULTS: We developed a new approach called Defiant to identify DMRs. Employing Weighted Welch Expansion (WWE), Defiant showed superior performance to other predictors in the series of benchmarking tests on artificial and real data. Defiant was subsequently used to investigate DNA methylation changes in iron-deficient rat hippocampus. Defiant identified DMRs close to genes associated with neuronal development and plasticity, which were not identified by its competitor. Importantly, Defiant runs between 5 to 479 times faster than currently available software packages. Also, Defiant accepts 10 different input formats widely used for DNA methylation data. CONCLUSIONS: Defiant effectively identifies DMRs for whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS), reduced-representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS), Tet-assisted bisulfite sequencing (TAB-seq), and HpaII tiny fragment enrichment by ligation-mediated PCR-tag (HELP) assays.
David E. Condon, Phu V. Tran, Yu-Chin Lien, Jonathan Schug, Michael K. Georgieff, Rebecca A. Simmons, Kyoung-Jae Won
BMC Bioinform.4
2011 Comparative analysis of RNA-Seq alignment algorithms and the RNA-Seq unified mapper (RUM)
abstract
MOTIVATION: A critical task in high-throughput sequencing is aligning millions of short reads to a reference genome. Alignment is especially complicated for RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) because of RNA splicing. A number of RNA-Seq algorithms are available, and claim to align reads with high accuracy and efficiency while detecting splice junctions. RNA-Seq data are discrete in nature; therefore, with reasonable gene models and comparative metrics RNA-Seq data can be simulated to sufficient accuracy to enable meaningful benchmarking of alignment algorithms. The exercise to rigorously compare all viable published RNA-Seq algorithms has not been performed previously. RESULTS: We developed an RNA-Seq simulator that models the main impediments to RNA alignment, including alternative splicing, insertions, deletions, substitutions, sequencing errors and intron signal. We used this simulator to measure the accuracy and robustness of available algorithms at the base and junction levels. Additionally, we used reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Sanger sequencing to validate the ability of the algorithms to detect novel transcript features such as novel exons and alternative splicing in RNA-Seq data from mouse retina. A pipeline based on BLAT was developed to explore the performance of established tools for this problem, and to compare it to the recently developed methods. This pipeline, the RNA-Seq Unified Mapper (RUM), performs comparably to the best current aligners and provides an advantageous combination of accuracy, speed and usability. AVAILABILITY: The RUM pipeline is distributed via the Amazon Cloud and for computing clusters using the Sun Grid Engine (http://cbil.upenn.edu/RUM). CONTACT: [email protected]; [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The RNA-Seq sequence reads described in the article are deposited at GEO, accession GSE26248.
Gregory R. Grant, Michael H. Farkas, Angel D. Pizarro, Nicholas F. Lahens, Jonathan Schug, Brian P. Brunk, Christian J. Stoeckert Jr., John B. Hogenesch, Eric A. Pierce
Bioinform.5
2011 Mitochondrial Genome Sequence Analysis: A custom bioinformatics pipeline substantially improves Affymetrix MitoChip v2.0 call rate and accuracy
abstract
BACKGROUND: Mitochondrial genome sequence analysis is critical to the diagnostic evaluation of mitochondrial disease. Existing methodologies differ widely in throughput, complexity, cost efficiency, and sensitivity of heteroplasmy detection. Affymetrix MitoChip v2.0, which uses a sequencing-by-genotyping technology, allows potentially accurate and high-throughput sequencing of the entire human mitochondrial genome to be completed in a cost-effective fashion. However, the relatively low call rate achieved using existing software tools has limited the wide adoption of this platform for either clinical or research applications. Here, we report the design and development of a custom bioinformatics software pipeline that achieves a much improved call rate and accuracy for the Affymetrix MitoChip v2.0 platform. We used this custom pipeline to analyze MitoChip v2.0 data from 24 DNA samples representing a broad range of tissue types (18 whole blood, 3 skeletal muscle, 3 cell lines), mutations (a 5.8 kilobase pair deletion and 6 known heteroplasmic mutations), and haplogroup origins. All results were compared to those obtained by at least one other mitochondrial DNA sequence analysis method, including Sanger sequencing, denaturing HPLC-based heteroduplex analysis, and/or the Illumina Genome Analyzer II next generation sequencing platform. RESULTS: An average call rate of 99.75% was achieved across all samples with our custom pipeline. Comparison of calls for 15 samples characterized previously by Sanger sequencing revealed a total of 29 discordant calls, which translates to an estimated 0.012% for the base call error rate. We successfully identified 4 known heteroplasmic mutations and 24 other potential heteroplasmic mutations across 20 samples that passed quality control. CONCLUSIONS: Affymetrix MitoChip v2.0 analysis using our optimized MitoChip Filtering Protocol (MFP) bioinformatics pipeline now offers the high sensitivity and accuracy needed for reliable, high-throughput and cost-efficient whole mitochondrial genome sequencing. This approach provides a viable alternative of potential utility for both clinical diagnostic and research applications to traditional Sanger and other emerging sequencing technologies for whole mitochondrial genome analysis.
Hongbo M. Xie, Juan C. Perin, Theodore G. Schurr, Matthew C. Dulik, Sergey I. Zhadanov, Joseph A. Baur, Michael P. King, Emily Place, Colleen Clarke, Michael Grauer, Jonathan Schug, Avni Santani, Anthony Albano, Cecilia Kim, Vincent Procaccio, Hakon Hakonarson, Xiaowu Gai, Marni J. Falk
BMC Bioinform.11
2002 Visual Programming for Modeling and Simulation of Biomolecular Regulatory Networks
Rajeev Alur, Calin Belta, Franjo Ivancic, Vijay Kumar 0001, Harvey Rubin, Jonathan Schug, Oleg Sokolsky, Jonathan Webb
HiPC6
2001 A relational schema for both array-based and SAGE gene expression experiments
abstract
Abstract Motivation and Results: A relational schema is described for capturing highly parallel gene expression experiments using different technologies. This schema grew out of efforts to build a database for collaborators working on different biological systems and using different types of platforms in their gene expression experiments as well as different types of image quantification software. The tables are conceptually organized into three categories of information: Platform, Experiment (which includes image scanning and quantification), and Data. The strengths of the schema are: (i) integrating information on array elements using a gene index; (ii) describing samples using ontologies; (iii) reducing an experiment to a single RNA source for precise descriptions yet not losing the relationships between experiments done at the same time or for the same project; and (iv) maintaining both raw and processed (e.g. cleansed and normalized) data and recording how the data is processed. The result is a novel schema, which can hold both array and non-array data, is extensible for detailed experimental descriptions that are precise and consistent, and allows for meaningful comparisons of genes between experiments. Availability: The schema is available at http://www.cbil.upenn.edu/cgi-bin/RAD2/schemaBrowserRAD.pl. Contact: [email protected] * To whom correspondence should be addressed. 2 Present address: Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel.
Christian J. Stoeckert Jr., Angel D. Pizarro, Elisabetta Manduchi, M. Gibson, Brian P. Brunk, Jonathan Crabtree, Jonathan Schug, Shai Shen-Orr, G. Christian Overton
Bioinform.7
1997 Modeling Transcription Factor Binding Sites with Gibbs Sampling and Minimum Description Length Encoding
Jonathan Schug, G. Christian Overton
ISMB1