Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Guy Latouche

dblp:90/5767 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
16ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0009-0001-0726-7811ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 9 · 4 first-authorComputer networks · 5 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
2 papers
Network performance modeling · 97% Routing and switching · 3%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Performance modeling and evaluation · 75% Parallel and multicore computing · 25%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network performance modeling › switch performance analysis
ATM switch performance
0.011990
Performance of an ATM Switch: Simulation Study · INFOCOM 1990
Network performance modeling › packet loss
cell loss probability
0.011990
Performance of an ATM Switch: Simulation Study · INFOCOM 1990
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models
0.021981
Algorithmic Analysis of a Multiprogramming-Multiprocessor Computer System · J. ACM 1981
Exponential Servers Sharing a Finite Storage: Comparison of Space Allocation Policies · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1980
Network performance modeling › point process
markov modulated arrival processes
0.011990
Performance of an ATM Switch: Simulation Study · INFOCOM 1990
Network performance modeling
traffic modeling
0.011990
Performance of an ATM Switch: Simulation Study · INFOCOM 1990
Parallel and multicore computing › multiprocessor system
multiprogramming-multiprocessor systems
0.011981
Algorithmic Analysis of a Multiprogramming-Multiprocessor Computer System · J. ACM 1981
Performance modeling and evaluation › queueing models
finite buffer queue
0.011980
Exponential Servers Sharing a Finite Storage: Comparison of Space Allocation Policies · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1980
Performance modeling and evaluation › queueing models
markov chain model
0.011981
Algorithmic Analysis of a Multiprogramming-Multiprocessor Computer System · J. ACM 1981
Routing and switching
packet switch
0.011980
Exponential Servers Sharing a Finite Storage: Comparison of Space Allocation Policies · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1980

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.0moment matching · 0.0discrete markov chain · 0.0markov chain analysis · 0.0markovian analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Feedback control: Two-sided Markov-modulated Brownian motion with instantaneous change of phase at boundaries
Guy Latouche, Giang T. Nguyen 0003
Perform. Evaluation1
2013 Poisson's equation for discrete-time quasi-birth-and-death processes
Sarah Dendievel, Guy Latouche, Yuanyuan Liu 0008
Perform. Evaluation2
2013 Level-phase independent stationary distributions for GI/M/1-type Markov chains with infinitely-many phases
Guy Latouche, Safieh Mahmoodi, Peter G. Taylor
Perform. Evaluation1
2012 How do we encourage an egoist to act socially in an ad hoc mobile network?
Anthony E. Krzesinski, Guy Latouche, Peter G. Taylor
Comput. Networks2
2010 Blocking probability computation in reversible Markovian bufferless multi-server systems
Miguel de Vega Rodrigo, Guy Latouche, Marie-Ange Remiche
Perform. Evaluation2
2009 Modeling bufferless packet-switching networks with packet dependencies
Miguel de Vega Rodrigo, Guy Latouche, Marie-Ange Remiche
Comput. Networks2
2006 Matrix-analytic methods for fluid queues with finite buffers
Ana da Silva Soares, Guy Latouche
Perform. Evaluation2
2005 Fluid queues to solve jump processes
Tessa Dzial, Lothar Breuer, Ana da Silva Soares, Guy Latouche, Marie-Ange Remiche
Perform. Evaluation4
2002 An MAP-based Poisson cluster model for Web traffic
Guy Latouche, Marie-Ange Remiche
Perform. Evaluation1
2001 Fishman's sampling plan for computing network reliability
abstract
This paper analyzes a sampling method proposed by Fishman (1986) for computing the 2-terminal and global reliability of a network. It describes the sampling algorithm, and computation experiments on networks corresponding to a real situation as well as examples from the literature. A communication network is modeled by an undirected graph as a function of the set of vertices (the network nodes) and the set of edges (the links connecting pairs of vertices). Each edge is in 1 of 2 states (operational and failed). Failures are assumed to be statistically independent. A network is connected if the set of edges that are operational, forms a spanning connected subgraph (a subgraph containing at least 1 operational path between any 2 vertices). The problems of computing: (1) the 2-terminal network reliability (probability that between 2 given vertices there exists at least 1 operational path); and (2) the global network reliability (probability that the network is connected), are treated. This paper provides: (i) a detailed, clear exposition of the Fishman method, (ii) a complete description of the corresponding algorithm, (iii) its extension for computing global reliability (problem 2), and (iv) computational experiments on networks both new and in the literature. A Monte Carlo approach for these problems is fully justified by looking at their computational complexity. The exact computation of the network reliability (either 2-terminal or global) is a /spl npar/P-complete problem. If one looks for efficient algorithms, one must settle for approximations obtained by a heuristic procedure.
Eugène Manzi, Martine Labbé, Guy Latouche, Francesco Maffioli
IEEE Trans. Reliab.3
1997 Applied Probability Modelling in Telecommunication
Phuoc Tran-Gia, Guy Latouche, U. Herzog
Perform. Evaluation2
1992 A Unified Stochastic Model for the Packet Stream from Periodic Sources
Guy Latouche, Vaidyanathan Ramaswami
Perform. Evaluation1
1990 Performance of an ATM Switch: Simulation Study
abstract
A parametric model is proposed for the cell arrival traffic on the input lines of a switch. The cell stream alternates between active and silent periods, and general distributions are allowed for the lengths of these periods. The traffic is represented by a discrete Markov chain model obtained through a simple moment matching procedure. The cell arrivals at in input port of the switch are typically non-Poisson and exhibit periodicities. The simulation experiments illustrate that each parameter included in the model has a significant impact on the performance of the switch (as measured by cell-loss probabilities, average cell delay, and steady-state queue length distribution).>
T. E. Eliazov, Vaidyanathan Ramaswami, Walter Willinger, Guy Latouche
INFOCOM4
1990 Sample Path Analysis of Packet Queues Subject to Periodic Traffic
Guy Latouche
Comput. Networks ISDN Syst.1
1981 Algorithmic Analysis of a Multiprogramming-Multiprocessor Computer System
abstract
A computer system consisting of several identical CPUs and several identical I/O units Is described The system works under light load conditions in a multlprogrammmg mode Programs belong either to an incoming queue, which may be empty, or to an inner loop if they are allowed access to the resources of the system The maximum number of programs in the inner loop is finite Under Markovlan assumptions it is shown that the steady-state probablhty distribution is of matrixgeometric form.The stablhty condition is exphcltly given For stable systems It Is shown how the stationary probability distribution, the virtual waiting time in the incoming queue, and other features of interest may be computed
Guy Latouche
J. ACM1
1980 Exponential Servers Sharing a Finite Storage: Comparison of Space Allocation Policies
abstract
Consider a finite waiting room shared by several servers. Such a system may approximate, for instance, a packet switch in a communications network. It is assumed that interarrival and service times have exponential distributions, and that a customer is lost if he cannot enter the waiting room. Different policies for sharing the finite waiting room are compared-the measure of performance being the probability that a customer is lost.
Guy Latouche
IEEE Trans. Commun.1