Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrei A. Rusu
dblp:90/8837 · also Andrei Alex Rusu
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 34% Learning paradigms · 29% Trustworthy machine learning · 28% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning |
1.5 | 3 | 2023 | Nevis'22: A Stream of 100 Tasks Sampled from 30 Years of Computer Vision Research · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 Meta-Learning with Warped Gradient Descent · ICLR 2020 Meta-Learning with Latent Embedding Optimization · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning |
1.0 | 2 | 2023 | Nevis'22: A Stream of 100 Tasks Sampled from 30 Years of Computer Vision Research · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 Continual Unsupervised Representation Learning · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial attack |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Hindering Adversarial Attacks with Implicit Neural Representations · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning
adversarial defense |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Hindering Adversarial Attacks with Implicit Neural Representations · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Hindering Adversarial Attacks with Implicit Neural Representations · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization
gradient descent |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Meta-Learning with Warped Gradient Descent · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning › catastrophic forgetting
catastrophic forgetting mitigation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Continual Unsupervised Representation Learning · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
unsupervised continual learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Continual Unsupervised Representation Learning · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain adaptation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | DARLA: Improving Zero-Shot Transfer in Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
zero-shot transfer |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | DARLA: Improving Zero-Shot Transfer in Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › dynamic neural network
dynamic expansion model |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Continual Unsupervised Representation Learning · NeurIPS 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
supervised learning · 0.7AutoML · 0.7parametric bypass approximation · 0.6implicit neural representation · 0.6meta-learning · 0.4gradient descent · 0.4task inference · 0.4rehearsal-based learning · 0.4disentangled representation learning · 0.3a3c · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nevis'22: A Stream of 100 Tasks Sampled from 30 Years of Computer Vision ResearchabstractA shared goal of several machine learning communities like continual learning, meta-learning and transfer learning, is to design algorithms and models that efficiently and robustly adapt to unseen tasks. An even more ambitious goal is to build models that never stop adapting, and that become increasingly more efficient through time by suitably transferring the accrued knowledge. Beyond the study of the actual learning algorithm and model architecture, there are several hurdles towards our quest to build such models, such as the choice of learning protocol, metric of success and data needed to validate research hypotheses. In this work, we introduce the Never-Ending VIsual-classification Stream (NEVIS'22), a benchmark consisting of a stream of over 100 visual classification tasks, sorted chronologically and extracted from papers sampled uniformly from computer vision proceedings spanning the last three decades. The resulting stream reflects what the research community thought was meaningful at any point in time, and it serves as an ideal test bed to assess how well models can adapt to new tasks, and do so better and more efficiently as time goes by. Despite being limited to classification, the resulting stream has a rich diversity of tasks from OCR, to texture analysis, scene recognition, and so forth. The diversity is also reflected in the wide range of dataset sizes, spanning over four orders of magnitude. Overall, NEVIS'22 poses an unprecedented challenge for current sequential learning approaches due to the scale and diversity of tasks, yet with a low entry barrier as it is limited to a single modality and well understood supervised learning problems. Moreover, we provide a reference implementation including strong baselines and an evaluation protocol to compare methods in terms of their trade-off between accuracy and compute. We hope that NEVIS'22 can be useful to researchers working on continual learning, meta-learning, AutoML and more generally sequential learning, and help these communities join forces towards more robust models that efficiently adapt to a never ending stream of data. Jörg Bornschein, Alexandre Galashov, Ross Hemsley, Amal Rannen Triki, Yutian Chen 0001, Arslan Chaudhry, Xu Owen He, Arthur Douillard, Massimo Caccia, Qixuan Feng, Sylvestre-Alvise Rebuffi, Kitty Stacpoole, Diego de Las Casas, Will Hawkins, Angeliki Lazaridou, Yee Whye Teh, Andrei A. Rusu, Razvan Pascanu, Marc'Aurelio Ranzato |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 18 |
| 2022 | Hindering Adversarial Attacks with Implicit Neural RepresentationsabstractWe introduce the Lossy Implicit Network Activation Coding (LINAC) defence, an input transformation which successfully hinders several common adversarial attacks on CIFAR-10 classifiers for perturbations up to 8/255 in Linf norm and 0.5 in L2 norm. Implicit neural representations are used to approximately encode pixel colour intensities in 2D images such that classifiers trained on transformed data appear to have robustness to small perturbations without adversarial training or large drops in performance. The seed of the random number generator used to initialise and train the implicit neural representation turns out to be necessary information for stronger generic attacks, suggesting its role as a private key. We devise a Parametric Bypass Approximation (PBA) attack strategy for key-based defences, which successfully invalidates an existing method in this category. Interestingly, our LINAC defence also hinders some transfer and adaptive attacks, including our novel PBA strategy. Our results emphasise the importance of a broad range of customised attacks despite apparent robustness according to standard evaluations. Andrei A. Rusu, Dan Andrei Calian, Sven Gowal, Raia Hadsell |
ICML | 1 |
| 2020 | Meta-Learning with Warped Gradient Descent
Sebastian Flennerhag, Andrei A. Rusu, Razvan Pascanu, Francesco Visin, Hujun Yin, Raia Hadsell |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2019 | Meta-Learning with Latent Embedding Optimization
Andrei A. Rusu, Dushyant Rao, Jakub Sygnowski, Oriol Vinyals, Razvan Pascanu, Simon Osindero, Raia Hadsell |
ICLR (Poster) | 1 |
| 2019 | Continual Unsupervised Representation LearningabstractContinual learning aims to improve the ability of modern learning systems to deal with non-stationary distributions, typically by attempting to learn a series of tasks sequentially. Prior art in the field has largely considered supervised or reinforcement learning tasks, and often assumes full knowledge of task labels and boundaries. In this work, we propose an approach (CURL) to tackle a more general problem that we will refer to as unsupervised continual learning. The focus is on learning representations without any knowledge about task identity, and we explore scenarios when there are abrupt changes between tasks, smooth transitions from one task to another, or even when the data is shuffled. The proposed approach performs task inference directly within the model, is able to dynamically expand to capture new concepts over its lifetime, and incorporates additional rehearsal-based techniques to deal with catastrophic forgetting. We demonstrate the efficacy of CURL in an unsupervised learning setting with MNIST and Omniglot, where the lack of labels ensures no information is leaked about the task. Further, we demonstrate strong performance compared to prior art in an i.i.d setting, or when adapting the technique to supervised tasks such as incremental class learning. Dushyant Rao, Francesco Visin, Andrei A. Rusu, Razvan Pascanu, Yee Whye Teh, Raia Hadsell |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2017 | DARLA: Improving Zero-Shot Transfer in Reinforcement LearningabstractDomain adaptation is an important open problem in deep reinforcement learning (RL). In many scenarios of interest data is hard to obtain, so agents may learn a source policy in a setting where data is readily available, with the hope that it generalises well to the target domain. We propose a new multi-stage RL agent, DARLA (DisentAngled Representation Learning Agent), which learns to see before learning to act. DARLA’s vision is based on learning a disentangled representation of the observed environment. Once DARLA can see, it is able to acquire source policies that are robust to many domain shifts – even with no access to the target domain. DARLA significantly outperforms conventional baselines in zero-shot domain adaptation scenarios, an effect that holds across a variety of RL environments (Jaco arm, DeepMind Lab) and base RL algorithms (DQN, A3C and EC). Irina Higgins, Arka Pal, Andrei A. Rusu, Loïc Matthey, Chris Burgess 0001, Alexander Pritzel, Matt M. Botvinick, Charles Blundell, Alexander Lerchner |
ICML | 3 |
| 2010 | Rank Distance Aggregation as a Fixed Classifier Combining Rule for Text Categorization
Liviu P. Dinu, Andrei A. Rusu |
CICLing | 2 |