Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Jitendra Subramanyam

dblp:90/9656 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program analysis · 50% Software maintenance and evolution · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution
software modularity
0.012011
An evaluation of the internal quality of business applications: does size matter? · ICSE 2011
Program analysis
static analysis
0.012011
An evaluation of the internal quality of business applications: does size matter? · ICSE 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

static analysis · 0.1empirical study · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 An evaluation of the internal quality of business applications: does size matter?
abstract
This study summarizes results of a study of the internal, structural quality of 288 business applications comprising 108 million lines of code collected from 75 companies in 8 industry segments. These applications were submitted to a static analysis that evaluates quality within and across application components that may be coded in different languages. The analysis consists of evaluating the application against a repository of over 900 rules of good architectural and coding practice. Results are presented for measures of security, performance, and changeability. The effect of size on quality is evaluated, and the ability of modularity to reduce the impact of size is suggested by the results.
Bill Curtis, Jay Sappidi, Jitendra Subramanyam
ICSE3