Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Venkatesh Balasubramanian

dblp:90/9786 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Computer networks · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 50% Data mining · 50%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
High-performance computing · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › multi-label classification
extreme classification
0.412019
Slice: Scalable Linear Extreme Classifiers Trained on 100 Million Labels for Related Searches · WSDM 2019
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › multi-label classification
extreme multi-label learning
0.412019
Slice: Scalable Linear Extreme Classifiers Trained on 100 Million Labels for Related Searches · WSDM 2019
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.412019
Slice: Scalable Linear Extreme Classifiers Trained on 100 Million Labels for Related Searches · WSDM 2019
Information retrieval
search engines
0.412019
Slice: Scalable Linear Extreme Classifiers Trained on 100 Million Labels for Related Searches · WSDM 2019
High-performance computing
scientific computing systems
0.412019
BLAS-on-flash: An Efficient Alternative for Large Scale ML Training and Inference? · NSDI 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

negative sampling · 0.4deep learning features · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 BLAS-on-flash: An Efficient Alternative for Large Scale ML Training and Inference?
Suhas Jayaram Subramanya, Harsha Vardhan Simhadri, Srajan Garg, Anil Kag, Venkatesh Balasubramanian
NSDI5
2019 Slice: Scalable Linear Extreme Classifiers Trained on 100 Million Labels for Related Searches
abstract
This paper reformulates the problem of recommending related queries on a search engine as an extreme multi-label learning task. Extreme multi-label learning aims to annotate each data point with the most relevant subset of labels from an extremely large label set. Each of the top 100 million queries on Bing was treated as a separate label in the proposed reformulation and an extreme classifier was learnt which took the user's query as input and predicted the relevant subset of 100 million queries as output. Unfortunately, state-of-the-art extreme classifiers have not been shown to scale beyond 10 million labels and have poor prediction accuracies for queries. This paper therefore develops the Slice algorithm which can be accurately trained on low-dimensional, dense deep learning features popularly used to represent queries and which efficiently scales to 100 million labels and 240 million training points. Slice achieves this by reducing the training and prediction times from linear to logarithmic in the number of labels based on a novel negative sampling technique. This allows the proposed reformulation to address some of the limitations of traditional related searches approaches in terms of coverage, density and quality. Experiments on publically available extreme classification datasets with low-dimensional dense features as well as related searches datasets mined from the Bing logs revealed that slice could be more accurate than leading extreme classifiers while also scaling to 100 million labels. Furthermore, slice was found to improve the accuracy of recommendations by 10% as compared to state-of-the-art related searches techniques. Finally, when added to the ensemble in production in Bing, slice was found to increase the trigger coverage by 52%, the suggestion density by 33%, the overall success rate by 2.6% and the success rate for tail queries by 12.6%. Slice's source code can be downloaded from [21].
Himanshu Jain, Venkatesh Balasubramanian, Bhanu Chunduri, Manik Varma
WSDM2