Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sebastian Brutzer

dblp:90/9989 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Video understanding and tracking · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
background subtraction
0.112011
Evaluation of background subtraction techniques for video surveillance · CVPR 2011
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video surveillance
0.012011
Evaluation of background subtraction techniques for video surveillance · CVPR 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

evaluation · 0.1benchmarking · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Evaluation of background subtraction techniques for video surveillance
abstract
Background subtraction is one of the key techniques for automatic video analysis, especially in the domain of video surveillance. Although its importance, evaluations of recent background subtraction methods with respect to the challenges of video surveillance suffer from various shortcomings. To address this issue, we first identify the main challenges of background subtraction in the field of video surveillance. We then compare the performance of nine background subtraction methods with post-processing according to their ability to meet those challenges. Therefore, we introduce a new evaluation data set with accurate ground truth annotations and shadow masks. This enables us to provide precise in-depth evaluation of the strengths and drawbacks of background subtraction methods.
Sebastian Brutzer, Benjamin Höferlin, Gunther Heidemann
CVPR1