Ashok Kumar Ponnuswami

dblp:91/3622 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 5 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 82% Web and social media mining · 18%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Learning theory · 73% Reinforcement learning · 16% Trustworthy machine learning · 12%
Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 43% Computational complexity · 33% Logic in computer science · 25%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › distributed information retrieval
federated search
0.222011
Model characterization curves for federated search using click-logs: predicting user engagement metrics for the span of feasible operating points · WWW 2011
On composition of a federated web search result page: using online users to provide pairwise preference for heterogeneous verticals · WSDM 2011
Information retrieval
retrieval evaluation
0.112011
Model characterization curves for federated search using click-logs: predicting user engagement metrics for the span of feasible operating points · WWW 2011
Web and social media mining › user engagement
user engagement metrics
0.112011
Model characterization curves for federated search using click-logs: predicting user engagement metrics for the span of feasible operating points · WWW 2011
Machine learning › Learning theory › PAC learning
halfspace learning
0.122009
On Agnostic Learning of Parities, Monomials, and Halfspaces · SIAM J. Comput. 2009
New Results for Learning Noisy Parities and Halfspaces · FOCS 2006
Machine learning › Learning theory › PAC learning
agnostic learning
0.112009
On Agnostic Learning of Parities, Monomials, and Halfspaces · SIAM J. Comput. 2009
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory › boolean function learning
parity learning
0.112009
On Agnostic Learning of Parities, Monomials, and Halfspaces · SIAM J. Comput. 2009
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning
0.112008
Minimizing Wide Range Regret with Time Selection Functions · COLT 2008
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
regret minimization
0.112008
Minimizing Wide Range Regret with Time Selection Functions · COLT 2008
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › robust learning
noise-tolerant learning
0.112006
New Results for Learning Noisy Parities and Halfspaces · FOCS 2006
Computational complexity
hardness of approximation
0.112006
Better Inapproximability Results for MaxClique, Chromatic Number and Min-3Lin-Deletion · ICALP (1) 2006
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph theory › clique
maximum clique
0.112006
Better Inapproximability Results for MaxClique, Chromatic Number and Min-3Lin-Deletion · ICALP (1) 2006
Logic in computer science
higher-order logic
0.022009
On Agnostic Learning of Parities, Monomials, and Halfspaces · SIAM J. Comput. 2009
New Results for Learning Noisy Parities and Halfspaces · FOCS 2006
Information retrieval › evaluation
relevance judgment
0.012011
On composition of a federated web search result page: using online users to provide pairwise preference for heterogeneous verticals · WSDM 2011
Information retrieval › search engines
search engine result page
0.012011
Model characterization curves for federated search using click-logs: predicting user engagement metrics for the span of feasible operating points · WWW 2011
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph coloring
chromatic number
0.012006
Better Inapproximability Results for MaxClique, Chromatic Number and Min-3Lin-Deletion · ICALP (1) 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

uniform distribution · 0.2noisy parity reduction · 0.2pairwise preference elicitation · 0.1click log analysis · 0.1reduction · 0.1parity learning algorithms · 0.1time selection functions · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 On composition of a federated web search result page: using online users to provide pairwise preference for heterogeneous verticals
abstract
Modern web search engines are federated --- a user query is sent to the numerous specialized search engines called verticals like web (text documents), News, Image, Video, etc. and the results returned by these engines are then aggregated and composed into a search result page (SERP) and presented to the user. For a specific query, multiple verticals could be relevant, which makes the placement of these vertical results within blocks of textual web results challenging: how do we represent, assess, and compare the relevance of these heterogeneous entities?
Ashok Kumar Ponnuswami, Kumaresh Pattabiraman, Ran Gilad-Bachrach, Tapas Kanungo
WSDM1
2011 Model characterization curves for federated search using click-logs: predicting user engagement metrics for the span of feasible operating points
abstract
Modern day federated search engines aggregate heterogeneous types of results from multiple vertical search engines and compose a single search engine result page (SERP). The search engine aggregates the results and produces one ranked list, constraining the vertical results to specific slots on the SERP.
Ashok Kumar Ponnuswami, Kumaresh Pattabiraman, Desmond Brand, Tapas Kanungo
WWW1
2009 On Agnostic Learning of Parities, Monomials, and Halfspaces
abstract
We study the learnability of several fundamental concept classes in the agnostic learning framework of [D. Haussler, Inform. and Comput., 100 (1992), pp. 78–150] and [M. Kearns, R. Schapire, and L. Sellie, Machine Learning, 17 (1994), pp. 115–141]. We show that under the uniform distribution, agnostically learning parities reduce to learning parities with random classification noise, commonly referred to as the noisy parity problem. Together with the parity learning algorithm of [A. Blum, A. Kalai, and H. Wasserman, J. ACM, 50 (2003), pp. 506–519], this gives the first nontrivial algorithm for agnostic learning of parities. We use similar techniques to reduce learning of two other fundamental concept classes under the uniform distribution to learning of noisy parities. Namely, we show that learning of disjunctive normal form (DNF) expressions reduces to learning noisy parities of just logarithmic number of variables, and learning of k-juntas reduces to learning noisy parities of k variables. We give essentially optimal hardness results for agnostic learning of monomials over $\{0,1\}^n$ and halfspaces over $\mathbb{Q}^n$. We show that for any constant $\epsilon$ finding a monomial (halfspace) that agrees with an unknown function on $1/2+\epsilon$ fraction of the examples is NP-hard even when there exists a monomial (halfspace) that agrees with the unknown function on $1-\epsilon$ fraction of the examples. This resolves an open question due to Blum and significantly improves on a number of previous hardness results for these problems. We extend these results to $\epsilon=2^{-\log^{1-\lambda}n}$ ($\epsilon=2^{-\sqrt{\log n}}$ in the case of halfspaces) for any constant $\lambda>0$ under stronger complexity assumptions.
Vitaly Feldman, Parikshit Gopalan, Subhash Khot, Ashok Kumar Ponnuswami
SIAM J. Comput.4
2008 Minimizing Wide Range Regret with Time Selection Functions
Subhash Khot, Ashok Kumar Ponnuswami
COLT2
2007 Approximation Algorithms for the Max-Min Allocation Problem
Subhash Khot, Ashok Kumar Ponnuswami
APPROX-RANDOM2
2006 New Results for Learning Noisy Parities and Halfspaces
abstract
We address well-studied problems concerning the learn-ability of parities and halfspaces in the presence of classification noise. Learning of parities under the uniform distribution with random classification noise, also called the noisy parity problem is a famous open problem in computational learning. We reduce a number of basic problems regarding learning under the uniform distribution to learning of noisy parities. We show that under the uniform distribution, learning parities with adversarial classification noise reduces to learning parities with random classification noise. Together with the parity learning algorithm of Blum et al. (2003), this gives the first nontrivial algorithm for learning parities with adversarial noise. We show that learning of DNF expressions reduces to learning noisy parities of just logarithmic number of variables. We show that learning of k-juntas reduces to learning noisy parities of k variables. These reductions work even in the presence of random classification noise in the original DNF or junta. We then consider the problem of learning halfspaces over Qopfnwith adversarial noise or finding a halfspace that maximizes the agreement rate with a given set of examples. We prove an essentially optimal hardness factor of 2 - epsi, improving the factor of (85/84) - epsi due to Bshouty and Burroughs (2002). Finally, we show that majorities of halfspaces are hard to PAC-learn using any representation, based on the cryptographic assumption underlying the Ajtai-Dwork cryptosystem
Vitaly Feldman, Parikshit Gopalan, Subhash Khot, Ashok Kumar Ponnuswami
FOCS4
2006 Better Inapproximability Results for MaxClique, Chromatic Number and Min-3Lin-Deletion
Subhash Khot, Ashok Kumar Ponnuswami
ICALP (1)2
2004 Monotone Multilinear Boolean Circuits for Bipartite Perfect Matching Require Exponential Size
Ashok Kumar Ponnuswami, H. Venkateswaran
FSTTCS1