Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Krishnakumar Pillai

dblp:91/4600 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational finance and economics · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational finance and economics › economics
software economics
0.011997
A Model for Software Development Effort and Cost Estimation · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1997
Empirical software engineering › software effort estimation
effort estimation model
0.011997
A Model for Software Development Effort and Cost Estimation · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1997
Empirical software engineering
software effort estimation
0.011997
A Model for Software Development Effort and Cost Estimation · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

norden/rayleigh curve · 0.0analytic modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 Statistical analysis of nonstationary software metrics
Krishnakumar Pillai, Suku Nair
Inf. Softw. Technol.1
1997 A Model for Software Development Effort and Cost Estimation
abstract
Several algorithmic models have been proposed to estimate software costs and other management parameters. Early prediction of completion time is absolutely essential for proper advance planning and aversion of the possible ruin of a project. L.H. Putnam's (1978) SLIM (Software LIfecycle Management) model offers a fairly reliable method that is used extensively to predict project completion times and manpower requirements as the project evolves. However, the nature of the Norden/Rayleigh curve used by Putnam renders it unreliable during the initial phases of the project, especially in projects involving a fast manpower buildup, as is the case with most software projects. In this paper, we propose the use of a model that improves early prediction considerably over the Putnam model. An analytic proof of the model's improved performance is also demonstrated on simulated data.
Krishnakumar Pillai, Suku Nair
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.1