Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Krishnakumar Pillai
dblp:91/4600
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational finance and economics · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational finance and economics › economics
software economics |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | A Model for Software Development Effort and Cost Estimation · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1997 |
Empirical software engineering › software effort estimation
effort estimation model |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | A Model for Software Development Effort and Cost Estimation · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1997 |
Empirical software engineering
software effort estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | A Model for Software Development Effort and Cost Estimation · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1997 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
norden/rayleigh curve · 0.0analytic modeling · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 | Statistical analysis of nonstationary software metrics
Krishnakumar Pillai, Suku Nair |
Inf. Softw. Technol. | 1 |
| 1997 | A Model for Software Development Effort and Cost EstimationabstractSeveral algorithmic models have been proposed to estimate software costs and other management parameters. Early prediction of completion time is absolutely essential for proper advance planning and aversion of the possible ruin of a project. L.H. Putnam's (1978) SLIM (Software LIfecycle Management) model offers a fairly reliable method that is used extensively to predict project completion times and manpower requirements as the project evolves. However, the nature of the Norden/Rayleigh curve used by Putnam renders it unreliable during the initial phases of the project, especially in projects involving a fast manpower buildup, as is the case with most software projects. In this paper, we propose the use of a model that improves early prediction considerably over the Putnam model. An analytic proof of the model's improved performance is also demonstrated on simulated data. Krishnakumar Pillai, Suku Nair |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 1 |