Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jurgen Van Gael
dblp:91/6785
· DBLP profile ↗
12ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 4 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 80% Graph learning · 11% Information extraction and text analysis · 9% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Information retrieval · 63% Knowledge graphs · 37% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model |
0.4 | 4 | 2011 | Message Passing Algorithms for the Dirichlet Diffusion Tree · ICML 2011 The infinite HMM for unsupervised PoS tagging · EMNLP 2009 The Infinite Factorial Hidden Markov Model · NIPS 2008 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › hidden markov model
infinite hidden markov model |
0.2 | 2 | 2009 | The infinite HMM for unsupervised PoS tagging · EMNLP 2009 Beam sampling for the infinite hidden Markov model · ICML 2008 |
Information retrieval › user interaction
personalization |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Transparent user models for personalization · KDD 2012 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
message passing |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Message Passing Algorithms for the Dirichlet Diffusion Tree · ICML 2011 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
statistical inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Message Passing Algorithms for the Dirichlet Diffusion Tree · ICML 2011 |
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph construction |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | CoBayes: bayesian knowledge corroboration with assessors of unknown areas of expertise · WSDM 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sequence labeling
part-of-speech tagging |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | The infinite HMM for unsupervised PoS tagging · EMNLP 2009 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Beam sampling for the infinite hidden Markov model · ICML 2008 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
slice sampling |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Beam sampling for the infinite hidden Markov model · ICML 2008 |
Information retrieval
cross-language information retrieval |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Correlation Clustering for Crosslingual Link Detection · IJCAI 2007 |
Human-AI interaction
explainable AI |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Transparent user models for personalization · KDD 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
dynamic programming · 0.2variational message passing · 0.1message passing · 0.1expectation propagation · 0.1dirichlet diffusion tree · 0.1bayesian inference · 0.1slice sampling · 0.1gibbs sampling · 0.1beam sampling · 0.1correlation clustering · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Transparent user models for personalizationabstractPersonalization is a ubiquitous phenomenon in our daily online experience. While such technology is critical for helping us combat the overload of information we face, in many cases, we may not even realize that our results are being tailored to our personal tastes and preferences. Worse yet, when such a system makes a mistake, we have little recourse to correct it. Khalid El-Arini, Ulrich Paquet, Ralf Herbrich, Jurgen Van Gael, Blaise Agüera y Arcas |
KDD | 4 |
| 2011 | DBrev: Dreaming of a Database Revolution
Gjergji Kasneci, Jurgen Van Gael, Thore Graepel |
CIDR | 2 |
| 2011 | Measure Transformer Semantics for Bayesian Machine Learning
Johannes Borgström, Andrew D. Gordon 0001, Michael Greenberg 0002, James Margetson, Jurgen Van Gael |
ESOP | 5 |
| 2011 | Message Passing Algorithms for the Dirichlet Diffusion Tree
David A. Knowles, Jurgen Van Gael, Zoubin Ghahramani |
ICML | 2 |
| 2011 | CoBayes: bayesian knowledge corroboration with assessors of unknown areas of expertiseabstractOur work aims at building probabilistic tools for constructing and maintaining large-scale knowledge bases containing entity-relationship-entity triples (statements) extracted from the Web. In order to mitigate the uncertainty inherent in information extraction and integration we propose leveraging the "wisdom of the crowds" by aggregating truth assessments that users provide about statements. The suggested method, CoBayes, operates on a collection of statements, a set of deduction rules (e.g. transitivity), a set of users, and a set of truth assessments of users about statements. We propose a joint probabilistic model of the truth values of statements and the expertise of users for assessing statements. The truth values of statements are interconnected through derivations based on the deduction rules. The correctness of a user's assessment for a given statement is modeled by linear mappings from user descriptions and statement descriptions into a common latent knowledge space where the inner product between user and statement vectors determines the probability that the user assessment for that statement will be correct. Bayesian inference in this complex graphical model is performed using mixed variational and expectation propagation message passing. We demonstrate the viability of CoBayes in comparison to other approaches, on realworld datasets and user feedback collected from Amazon Mechanical Turk. Gjergji Kasneci, Jurgen Van Gael, David H. Stern, Thore Graepel |
WSDM | 2 |
| 2010 | Probabilistic graphical models for semi-supervised traffic classificationabstractTraffic classification using machine learning continues to be an active research area. The majority of work in this area uses off-the-shelf machine learning tools and treats them as black-box classifiers. This approach turns all the modelling complexity into a feature selection problem. In this paper, we build a problem-specific solution to the traffic classification problem by designing a custom probabilistic graphical model. Graphical models are a modular framework to design classifiers which incorporate domain-specific knowledge. More specifically, our solution introduces semi-supervised learning which means we learn from both labelled and unlabelled traffic flows. We show that our solution performs competitively compared to previous approaches while using less data and simpler features. Copyright © 2010 ACM. Charalampos Rotsos, Jurgen Van Gael, Andrew W. Moore 0002, Zoubin Ghahramani |
IWCMC | 2 |
| 2010 | Bayesian Knowledge Corroboration with Logical Rules and User Feedback
Gjergji Kasneci, Jurgen Van Gael, Ralf Herbrich, Thore Graepel |
ECML/PKDD (2) | 2 |
| 2009 | The infinite HMM for unsupervised PoS tagging
Jurgen Van Gael, Andreas Vlachos 0001, Zoubin Ghahramani |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2008 | Beam sampling for the infinite hidden Markov modelabstractThe infinite hidden Markov model is a non-parametric extension of the widely used hidden Markov model. Our paper introduces a new inference algorithm for the infinite Hidden Markov model called beam sampling. Beam sampling combines slice sampling, which limits the number of states considered at each time step to a finite number, with dynamic programming, which samples whole state trajectories efficiently. Our algorithm typically outperforms the Gibbs sampler and is more robust. We present applications of iHMM inference using the beam sampler on changepoint detection and text prediction problems. Jurgen Van Gael, Yunus Saatci, Yee Whye Teh, Zoubin Ghahramani |
ICML | 1 |
| 2008 | The Infinite Factorial Hidden Markov ModelabstractWe introduces a new probability distribution over a potentially infinite number of binary Markov chains which we call the Markov Indian buffet process. This process extends the IBP to allow temporal dependencies in the hidden variables. We use this stochastic process to build a nonparametric extension of the factorial hidden Markov model. After working out an inference scheme which combines slice sampling and dynamic programming we demonstrate how the infinite factorial hidden Markov model can be used for blind source separation. Jurgen Van Gael, Yee Whye Teh, Zoubin Ghahramani |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2007 | Correlation Clustering for Crosslingual Link Detection
Jurgen Van Gael, Xiaojin Zhu 0001 |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2007 | Improving Diversity in Ranking using Absorbing Random Walks
Xiaojin Zhu 0001, Andrew B. Goldberg, Jurgen Van Gael, David Andrzejewski |
HLT-NAACL | 3 |