Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jurgen Van Gael

dblp:91/6785 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 4 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 80% Graph learning · 11% Information extraction and text analysis · 9%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Information retrieval · 63% Knowledge graphs · 37%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model
0.442011
Message Passing Algorithms for the Dirichlet Diffusion Tree · ICML 2011
The infinite HMM for unsupervised PoS tagging · EMNLP 2009
The Infinite Factorial Hidden Markov Model · NIPS 2008
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › hidden markov model
infinite hidden markov model
0.222009
The infinite HMM for unsupervised PoS tagging · EMNLP 2009
Beam sampling for the infinite hidden Markov model · ICML 2008
Information retrieval › user interaction
personalization
0.112012
Transparent user models for personalization · KDD 2012
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
message passing
0.112011
Message Passing Algorithms for the Dirichlet Diffusion Tree · ICML 2011
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
statistical inference
0.112011
Message Passing Algorithms for the Dirichlet Diffusion Tree · ICML 2011
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph construction
0.112011
CoBayes: bayesian knowledge corroboration with assessors of unknown areas of expertise · WSDM 2011
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sequence labeling
part-of-speech tagging
0.112009
The infinite HMM for unsupervised PoS tagging · EMNLP 2009
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo
0.112008
Beam sampling for the infinite hidden Markov model · ICML 2008
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
slice sampling
0.112008
Beam sampling for the infinite hidden Markov model · ICML 2008
Information retrieval
cross-language information retrieval
0.112007
Correlation Clustering for Crosslingual Link Detection · IJCAI 2007
Human-AI interaction
explainable AI
0.012012
Transparent user models for personalization · KDD 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

dynamic programming · 0.2variational message passing · 0.1message passing · 0.1expectation propagation · 0.1dirichlet diffusion tree · 0.1bayesian inference · 0.1slice sampling · 0.1gibbs sampling · 0.1beam sampling · 0.1correlation clustering · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Transparent user models for personalization
abstract
Personalization is a ubiquitous phenomenon in our daily online experience. While such technology is critical for helping us combat the overload of information we face, in many cases, we may not even realize that our results are being tailored to our personal tastes and preferences. Worse yet, when such a system makes a mistake, we have little recourse to correct it.
Khalid El-Arini, Ulrich Paquet, Ralf Herbrich, Jurgen Van Gael, Blaise Agüera y Arcas
KDD4
2011 DBrev: Dreaming of a Database Revolution
Gjergji Kasneci, Jurgen Van Gael, Thore Graepel
CIDR2
2011 Measure Transformer Semantics for Bayesian Machine Learning
Johannes Borgström, Andrew D. Gordon 0001, Michael Greenberg 0002, James Margetson, Jurgen Van Gael
ESOP5
2011 Message Passing Algorithms for the Dirichlet Diffusion Tree
David A. Knowles, Jurgen Van Gael, Zoubin Ghahramani
ICML2
2011 CoBayes: bayesian knowledge corroboration with assessors of unknown areas of expertise
abstract
Our work aims at building probabilistic tools for constructing and maintaining large-scale knowledge bases containing entity-relationship-entity triples (statements) extracted from the Web. In order to mitigate the uncertainty inherent in information extraction and integration we propose leveraging the "wisdom of the crowds" by aggregating truth assessments that users provide about statements. The suggested method, CoBayes, operates on a collection of statements, a set of deduction rules (e.g. transitivity), a set of users, and a set of truth assessments of users about statements. We propose a joint probabilistic model of the truth values of statements and the expertise of users for assessing statements. The truth values of statements are interconnected through derivations based on the deduction rules. The correctness of a user's assessment for a given statement is modeled by linear mappings from user descriptions and statement descriptions into a common latent knowledge space where the inner product between user and statement vectors determines the probability that the user assessment for that statement will be correct. Bayesian inference in this complex graphical model is performed using mixed variational and expectation propagation message passing. We demonstrate the viability of CoBayes in comparison to other approaches, on realworld datasets and user feedback collected from Amazon Mechanical Turk.
Gjergji Kasneci, Jurgen Van Gael, David H. Stern, Thore Graepel
WSDM2
2010 Probabilistic graphical models for semi-supervised traffic classification
abstract
Traffic classification using machine learning continues to be an active research area. The majority of work in this area uses off-the-shelf machine learning tools and treats them as black-box classifiers. This approach turns all the modelling complexity into a feature selection problem. In this paper, we build a problem-specific solution to the traffic classification problem by designing a custom probabilistic graphical model. Graphical models are a modular framework to design classifiers which incorporate domain-specific knowledge. More specifically, our solution introduces semi-supervised learning which means we learn from both labelled and unlabelled traffic flows. We show that our solution performs competitively compared to previous approaches while using less data and simpler features. Copyright © 2010 ACM.
Charalampos Rotsos, Jurgen Van Gael, Andrew W. Moore 0002, Zoubin Ghahramani
IWCMC2
2010 Bayesian Knowledge Corroboration with Logical Rules and User Feedback
Gjergji Kasneci, Jurgen Van Gael, Ralf Herbrich, Thore Graepel
ECML/PKDD (2)2
2009 The infinite HMM for unsupervised PoS tagging
Jurgen Van Gael, Andreas Vlachos 0001, Zoubin Ghahramani
EMNLP1
2008 Beam sampling for the infinite hidden Markov model
abstract
The infinite hidden Markov model is a non-parametric extension of the widely used hidden Markov model. Our paper introduces a new inference algorithm for the infinite Hidden Markov model called beam sampling. Beam sampling combines slice sampling, which limits the number of states considered at each time step to a finite number, with dynamic programming, which samples whole state trajectories efficiently. Our algorithm typically outperforms the Gibbs sampler and is more robust. We present applications of iHMM inference using the beam sampler on changepoint detection and text prediction problems.
Jurgen Van Gael, Yunus Saatci, Yee Whye Teh, Zoubin Ghahramani
ICML1
2008 The Infinite Factorial Hidden Markov Model
abstract
We introduces a new probability distribution over a potentially infinite number of binary Markov chains which we call the Markov Indian buffet process. This process extends the IBP to allow temporal dependencies in the hidden variables. We use this stochastic process to build a nonparametric extension of the factorial hidden Markov model. After working out an inference scheme which combines slice sampling and dynamic programming we demonstrate how the infinite factorial hidden Markov model can be used for blind source separation.
Jurgen Van Gael, Yee Whye Teh, Zoubin Ghahramani
NIPS1
2007 Correlation Clustering for Crosslingual Link Detection
Jurgen Van Gael, Xiaojin Zhu 0001
IJCAI1
2007 Improving Diversity in Ranking using Absorbing Random Walks
Xiaojin Zhu 0001, Andrew B. Goldberg, Jurgen Van Gael, David Andrzejewski
HLT-NAACL3