Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jon-Chyuan Chu

dblp:91/6992 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 91% Web and social media mining · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering
0.112009
Collaborative filtering for orkut communities: discovery of user latent behavior · WWW 2009
Recommender systems › social recommendation
community recommendation
0.112009
Collaborative filtering for orkut communities: discovery of user latent behavior · WWW 2009
Recommender systems › collaborative filtering
matrix factorization
0.112009
Collaborative filtering for orkut communities: discovery of user latent behavior · WWW 2009
Web and social media mining › community analysis
social network community analysis
0.012009
Collaborative filtering for orkut communities: discovery of user latent behavior · WWW 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

parallel LDA · 0.1latent dirichlet allocation · 0.1association rule mining · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Collaborative filtering for orkut communities: discovery of user latent behavior
abstract
Users of social networking services can connect with each other by forming communities for online interaction. Yet as the number of communities hosted by such websites grows over time, users have even greater need for effective community recommendations in order to meet more users. In this paper, we investigate two algorithms from very different domains and evaluate their effectiveness for personalized community recommendation. First is association rule mining (ARM), which discovers associations between sets of communities that are shared across many users. Second is latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA), which models user-community co-occurrences using latent aspects. In comparing LDA with ARM, we are interested in discovering whether modeling low-rank latent structure is more effective for recommendations than directly mining rules from the observed data. We experiment on an Orkut data set consisting of 492,104 users and 118,002 communities. Our empirical comparisons using the top-k recommendations metric show that LDA performs consistently better than ARM for the community recommendation task when recommending a list of 4 or more communities. However, for recommendation lists of up to 3 communities, ARM is still a bit better. We analyze examples of the latent information learned by LDA to explain this finding. To efficiently handle the large-scale data set, we parallelize LDA on distributed computers and demonstrate our parallel implementation's scalability with varying numbers of machines.
Wen-Yen Chen, Jon-Chyuan Chu, Junyi Luan, Hongjie Bai, Edward Y. Chang
WWW2