Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Elena Helman

dblp:91/7064 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational geometry · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
computational genomics
0.112009
A geometric approach for classification and comparison of structural variants · Bioinform. 2009
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence variation analysis
structural variant comparison
0.112009
A geometric approach for classification and comparison of structural variants · Bioinform. 2009
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › structural variation
structural variant detection
0.112009
A geometric approach for classification and comparison of structural variants · Bioinform. 2009
Computational geometry › geometric intersection
polygon intersection
0.012009
A geometric approach for classification and comparison of structural variants · Bioinform. 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

paired-end sequencing · 0.2computational geometry · 0.2array comparative genomic hybridization · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 A geometric approach for classification and comparison of structural variants
abstract
MOTIVATION: Structural variants, including duplications, insertions, deletions and inversions of large blocks of DNA sequence, are an important contributor to human genome variation. Measuring structural variants in a genome sequence is typically more challenging than measuring single nucleotide changes. Current approaches for structural variant identification, including paired-end DNA sequencing/mapping and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), do not identify the boundaries of variants precisely. Consequently, most reported human structural variants are poorly defined and not readily compared across different studies and measurement techniques. RESULTS: We introduce Geometric Analysis of Structural Variants (GASV), a geometric approach for identification, classification and comparison of structural variants. This approach represents the uncertainty in measurement of a structural variant as a polygon in the plane, and identifies measurements supporting the same variant by computing intersections of polygons. We derive a computational geometry algorithm to efficiently identify all such intersections. We apply GASV to sequencing data from nine individual human genomes and several cancer genomes. We obtain better localization of the boundaries of structural variants, distinguish genetic from putative somatic structural variants in cancer genomes, and integrate aCGH and paired-end sequencing measurements of structural variants. This work presents the first general framework for comparing structural variants across multiple samples and measurement techniques, and will be useful for studies of both genetic structural variants and somatic rearrangements in cancer. AVAILABILITY: http://cs.brown.edu/people/braphael/software.html .
Suzanne Sindi, Elena Helman, Ali Bashir, Benjamin J. Raphael
Bioinform.2