Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Matthew G. Snover

dblp:92/2011 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 30% Speech recognition and synthesis · 24% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 16%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain adaptation
0.112008
Language and Translation Model Adaptation using Comparable Corpora · EMNLP 2008
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
large language model adaptation
0.112008
Language and Translation Model Adaptation using Comparable Corpora · EMNLP 2008
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
morphological analysis
0.122002
A Probabilistic Model for Learning Concatenative Morphology · NIPS 2002
A Bayesian Model for Morpheme and Paradigm Identification · ACL 2001
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › spoken language understanding
speech parsing
0.112006
PCFGs with Syntactic and Prosodic Indicators of Speech Repairs · ACL 2006
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › spontaneous speech processing
speech repair detection
0.112006
PCFGs with Syntactic and Prosodic Indicators of Speech Repairs · ACL 2006
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
0.112006
PCFGs with Syntactic and Prosodic Indicators of Speech Repairs · ACL 2006
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative model
0.022002
A Probabilistic Model for Learning Concatenative Morphology · NIPS 2002
A Bayesian Model for Morpheme and Paradigm Identification · ACL 2001
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › non-parallel corpora
comparable corpora
0.012008
Language and Translation Model Adaptation using Comparable Corpora · EMNLP 2008
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
multilingual NLP
0.012008
Language and Translation Model Adaptation using Comparable Corpora · EMNLP 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

comparable corpora mining · 0.1decision tree ensemble · 0.1PCFG · 0.1hill climbing · 0.0generative probability model · 0.0directed search · 0.0lattice search · 0.0bayesian inference · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Expected dependency pair match: predicting translation quality with expected syntactic structure
Jeremy G. Kahn, Matthew G. Snover, Mari Ostendorf
Mach. Transl.2
2009 TER-Plus: paraphrase, semantic, and alignment enhancements to Translation Edit Rate
Matthew G. Snover, Nitin Madnani, Bonnie J. Dorr, Richard M. Schwartz
Mach. Transl.1
2008 Language and Translation Model Adaptation using Comparable Corpora
Matthew G. Snover, Bonnie J. Dorr, Richard M. Schwartz
EMNLP1
2006 PCFGs with Syntactic and Prosodic Indicators of Speech Repairs
abstract
A grammatical method of combining two kinds of speech repair cues is presented. One cue, prosodic disjuncture, is detected by a decision tree-based ensemble classifier that uses acoustic cues to identify where normal prosody seems to be interrupted (Lickley, 1996). The other cue, syntactic parallelism, codifies the expectation that repairs continue a syntactic category that was left unfinished in the reparandum (Levelt, 1983). The two cues are combined in a Treebank PCFG whose states are split using a few simple tree transformations. Parsing performance on the Switchboard and Fisher corpora suggests that these two cues help to locate speech repairs in a synergistic way.
John Hale, Izhak Shafran, Lisa Yung, Bonnie J. Dorr, Mary P. Harper, Anna Krasnyanskaya, Matthew Lease, Yang Liu 0004, Brian Roark, Matthew G. Snover, Robin Stewart
ACL10
2006 Reranking for Sentence Boundary Detection in Conversational Speech
abstract
We present a reranking approach to sentence-like unit (SU) boundary detection, one of the EARS metadata extraction tasks. Techniques for generating relatively small n-best lists with high oracle accuracy are presented. For each candidate, features are derived from a range of information sources, including the output of a number of parsers. Our approach yields significant improvements over the best performing system from the NIST RT-04F community evaluation
Brian Roark, Yang Liu 0004, Mary P. Harper, Robin Stewart, Matthew Lease, Matthew G. Snover, Izhak Shafran, Bonnie J. Dorr, John Hale, Anna Krasnyanskaya, Lisa Yung
ICASSP (1)6
2006 SParseval: Evaluation Metrics for Parsing Speech
Brian Roark, Mary P. Harper, Eugene Charniak, Bonnie J. Dorr, Mark Johnson 0001, Jeremy G. Kahn, Yang Liu 0004, Mari Ostendorf, John Hale, Anna Krasnyanskaya, Matthew Lease, Izhak Shafran, Matthew G. Snover, Robin Stewart, Lisa Yung
LREC13
2002 A Probabilistic Model for Learning Concatenative Morphology
abstract
This paper describes a system for the unsupervised learning of morpho- logical suffixes and stems from word lists. The system is composed of a generative probability model and hill-climbing and directed search algo- rithms. By extracting and examining morphologically rich subsets of an input lexicon, the directed search identifies highly productive paradigms. The hill-climbing algorithm then further maximizes the probability of the hypothesis. Quantitative results are shown by measuring the accuracy of the morphological relations identified. Experiments in English and Pol- ish, as well as comparisons with another recent unsupervised morphol- ogy learning algorithm demonstrate the effectiveness of this technique.
Matthew G. Snover, Michael R. Brent
NIPS1
2001 A Bayesian Model for Morpheme and Paradigm Identification
abstract
This paper describes a system for unsupervised learning of morphological affixes from texts or word lists. The system is composed of a generative probability model and a search algorithm. Experiments on the Wall Street Journal and the Hansard Corpus (French and English) demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach. The results suggest that more integrated systems for learning both affixes and morphographemic adjustment rules may be feasible. In addition, several definitions and a theorem are developed so that our search algorithm can be formalized in terms of the lattice formed by subsets of suffixes under inclusion. This formalism is expected to be useful for investigating alternative search strategies over the same morphological hypothesis space.
Matthew G. Snover, Michael R. Brent
ACL1