Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bernardo A. Movsichoff
dblp:92/2180
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 3 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
3 papers |
Routing and switching · 69% Internet architecture and protocols · 14% Network optimization and economics · 13% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Routing and switching
traffic engineering |
0.2 | 3 | 2007 | End-to-end optimal algorithms for integrated QoS, traffic engineering, and failure recovery · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2007 Decentralized optimal traffic engineering in connectionless networks · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2005 Adaptive control algorithms for decentralized optimal traffic engineering in the internet · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2004 |
Routing and switching › routing algorithms
optimal routing |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | End-to-end optimal algorithms for integrated QoS, traffic engineering, and failure recovery · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2007 |
Internet architecture and protocols
distributed control |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Decentralized optimal traffic engineering in connectionless networks · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2005 |
Network optimization and economics
resource allocation |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Decentralized optimal traffic engineering in connectionless networks · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2005 |
Routing and switching › traffic engineering
routing optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Decentralized optimal traffic engineering in connectionless networks · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2005 |
Routing and switching › traffic engineering
distributed traffic engineering |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Adaptive control algorithms for decentralized optimal traffic engineering in the internet · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2004 |
Network management and operations
failure recovery |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | End-to-end optimal algorithms for integrated QoS, traffic engineering, and failure recovery · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2007 |
Internet architecture and protocols › quality of service
differentiated services |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Decentralized optimal traffic engineering in connectionless networks · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2005 |
Routing and switching
multipath routing |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Adaptive control algorithms for decentralized optimal traffic engineering in the internet · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2004 |
Network optimization and economics › resource allocation
network utility maximization |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Adaptive control algorithms for decentralized optimal traffic engineering in the internet · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
optimization · 0.1utility function optimization · 0.1nonlinear control theory · 0.1sliding mode control · 0.0concave utility · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | End-to-end optimal algorithms for integrated QoS, traffic engineering, and failure recovery
Bernardo A. Movsichoff, Constantino M. Lagoa, Hao Che |
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. | 1 |
| 2005 | Decentralized optimal traffic engineering in connectionless networksabstractThis work addresses the problem of optimal traffic engineering in a connectionless autonomous system. Based on nonlinear control theory, the approach taken in This work provides a family of optimal adaptation laws. These laws enable each node in the network to independently distribute traffic among any given set of next hops in an optimal way, as measured by a given global utility function of a general form. This optimal traffic distribution is achieved with minimum information exchange between neighboring nodes. Furthermore, this approach not only allows for optimal multiple forwarding paths but also enables multiple classes of service, e.g., classes of service defined in the differentiated services architecture. Moreover, the proposed decentralized control scheme enables optimal traffic redistribution in the case of link failures. Suboptimal control laws are also presented in an effort to reduce the computational burden imposed on the nodes of the network. Finally, an implementation of these laws with currently available technology is discussed. Bernardo A. Movsichoff, Constantino M. Lagoa, Hao Che |
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. | 1 |
| 2004 | Adaptive control algorithms for decentralized optimal traffic engineering in the internetabstractIn this paper, we address the problem of optimal decentralized traffic engineering when multiple paths are available for each call. More precisely, given a set of possible paths for each call, we aim at distributing the traffic among the available paths in order to maximize a given utility function. To solve this problem, we propose a large family of decentralized sending rate control laws having the property that each of the members of this family "steers" the traffic allocation to an optimal operation point. The approach taken relies on the control theory concept of Sliding Modes. These control laws allow each ingress node to independently adjust its traffic sending rates and/or redistribute its sending rates among multiple paths. The only nonlocal information needed is binary feedback from each congested node in the path. The control laws presented are applicable to a large class of utility functions, namely, utility functions that can be expressed as the sum of concave functions of the sending rates. We show that the technique can be applied not only to usual rate adaptive traffic with multiple paths, but also to rate adaptive traffic with minimum service requirements and/or maximum allowed sending rate and to assured service with targeted rate guarantee, all allowing for multiple paths. It is also shown that these control laws are robust with respect to failures; i.e., they automatically reroute traffic if a link failure occurs. Finally, we provide some insight on how to choose the "right" control law. In particular, we provide a way of choosing a member of the family of control laws that reduces the sending rate oscillation caused by implementation constraints like delays and quantization. An example of application of the approach delineated in this paper is also presented. This example provides some insights on the implementation aspects and illustrates the robustness of the control laws developed in this paper. Constantino M. Lagoa, Hao Che, Bernardo A. Movsichoff |
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. | 3 |