Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nazan Khan
dblp:92/3234
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 82% Recommender systems · 18% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 77% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 23% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | How good is a span of terms?: exploiting proximity to improve web retrieval · SIGIR 2010 |
Information retrieval › ranking › search ranking
proximity ranking |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | How good is a span of terms?: exploiting proximity to improve web retrieval · SIGIR 2010 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | How good is a span of terms?: exploiting proximity to improve web retrieval · SIGIR 2010 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › model adaptation
model interpolation |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Model Adaptation via Model Interpolation and Boosting for Web Search Ranking · EMNLP 2009 |
Recommender systems
model update |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Model Adaptation via Model Interpolation and Boosting for Web Search Ranking · EMNLP 2009 |
Information retrieval › web search
web search ranking |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Model Adaptation via Model Interpolation and Boosting for Web Search Ranking · EMNLP 2009 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
boosting |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Model Adaptation via Model Interpolation and Boosting for Web Search Ranking · EMNLP 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
model interpolation · 0.2boosting · 0.2proximity features · 0.1phrase features · 0.1machine learning ranking · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | How good is a span of terms?: exploiting proximity to improve web retrievalabstractRanking search results is a fundamental problem in information retrieval. In this paper we explore whether the use of proximity and phrase information can improve web retrieval accuracy. We build on existing research by incorporating novel ranking features based on flexible proximity terms with recent state-of-the-art machine learning ranking models. We introduce a method of determining the goodness of a set of proximity terms that takes advantage of the structured nature of web documents, document metadata, and phrasal information from search engine user query logs. We perform experiments on a large real-world Web data collection and show that using the goodness score of flexible proximity terms can improve ranking accuracy over state-of-the-art ranking methods by as much as 13%. We also show that we can improve accuracy on the hardest queries by as much as 9% relative to state-of-the-art approaches. Krysta M. Svore, Pallika H. Kanani, Nazan Khan |
SIGIR | 3 |
| 2009 | Model Adaptation via Model Interpolation and Boosting for Web Search Ranking
Jianfeng Gao 0001, Christopher J. C. Burges, Krysta M. Svore, Nazan Khan, Shalin Shah |
EMNLP | 6 |
| 2002 | Multiple-objective Bayesian Optimization Algorithm
Nazan Khan, David E. Goldberg, Martin Pelikan |
GECCO | 1 |