Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wojciech Kilian

dblp:92/3965 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 4Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Storage systems · 86% Distributed systems · 14%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Storage systems
distributed storage
0.112009
HYDRAstor: A Scalable Secondary Storage · FAST 2009
Storage systems
scalable storage
0.112009
HYDRAstor: A Scalable Secondary Storage · FAST 2009
Storage systems › storage hierarchy
secondary storage
0.112009
HYDRAstor: A Scalable Secondary Storage · FAST 2009
Distributed systems › peer-to-peer systems
distributed hash table
0.012004
FPN: A Distributed Hash Table for Commercial Applications · HPDC 2004
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Reducing impact of data fragmentation caused by in-line deduplication
abstract
Deduplication results inevitably in data fragmentation, because logically continuous data is scattered across many disk locations. In this work we focus on fragmentation caused by duplicates from previous backups of the same backup set, since such duplicates are very common due to repeated full backups containing a lot of unchanged data. For systems with in-line dedup which detects duplicates during writing and avoids storing them, such fragmentation causes data from the latest backup being scattered across older backups. As a result, the time of restore from the latest backup can be significantly increased, sometimes more than doubled.
Michal Kaczmarczyk, Marcin Barczynski, Wojciech Kilian, Cezary Dubnicki
SYSTOR3
2011 Anchor-driven subchunk deduplication
abstract
Data deduplication, implemented usually with content defined chunking (CDC), is today one of key features of advanced storage systems providing space for backup applications. Although simple and effective, CDC generates chunks with sizes clustered around expected chunk size, which is globally fixed for a given storage system and applies to all backups. This creates opportunity for improvement, as the optimal chunk size for deduplication varies not only among backup datasets, but also within one dataset: long stretches of unchanged data favor larger chunks, whereas regions of change prefer smaller ones.
Bartlomiej Romanski, Lukasz Heldt, Wojciech Kilian, Krzysztof Lichota, Cezary Dubnicki
SYSTOR3
2009 HYDRAstor: A Scalable Secondary Storage
Cezary Dubnicki, Leszek Gryz, Lukasz Heldt, Michal Kaczmarczyk, Wojciech Kilian, Przemyslaw Strzelczak, Jerzy Szczepkowski, Cristian Ungureanu, Michal Welnicki
FAST5
2004 FPN: A Distributed Hash Table for Commercial Applications
Cezary Dubnicki, Cristian Ungureanu, Wojciech Kilian
HPDC3