Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bo Xiao 0001

dblp:92/6046-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 4Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 50% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 50%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
High-performance computing · 100%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Algorithms and data structures · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Machine learning and data management · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods › kernel approximation
nyström method
0.212015
Robust Treecode Approximation for Kernel Machines · KDD 2015
High-performance computing
performance optimization at scale
0.212015
Performance optimization for the k-nearest neighbors kernel on x86 architectures · SC 2015
High-performance computing
scientific computing systems
0.212015
A kernel-independent FMM in general dimensions · SC 2015
Algorithms and data structures › numerical algorithms
fast multipole method
0.212015
A kernel-independent FMM in general dimensions · SC 2015
Algorithms and data structures › similarity search
nearest neighbor search
0.212015
Performance optimization for the k-nearest neighbors kernel on x86 architectures · SC 2015
Machine learning and data management
kernel methods
0.112015
A kernel-independent FMM in general dimensions · SC 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

algebraic fast multipole method · 0.7x86 optimization · 0.4neighbor selection · 0.4distance calculation fusion · 0.4treecode · 0.2nystrom method · 0.2hierarchical decomposition · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 INV-ASKIT: A Parallel Fast Direct Solver for Kernel Matrices
abstract
We present a parallel algorithm for computing the approximate factorization of an N-by-N kernel matrix. Once this factorization has been constructed (with N log2 N work), we can solve linear systems with this matrix with N log N work. Kernel matrices represent pairwise interactions of points in metric spaces. They appear in machine learning, approximation theory, and computational physics. Kernel matrices are typically dense (matrix multiplication scales quadratically with N) and ill-conditioned (solves can require100s of Krylov iterations). Thus, fast algorithms for matrix multiplication and factorization are critical for scalability. Recently we introduced ASKIT, a new method, which resembles N-body methods, for approximating a kernel matrix. Here we introduce INV-IASKIT, a factorization scheme based on ASKIT. We describe the new method, derive complexity estimates, and conduct an empirical study of its accuracy and scalability. We report results on real-world datasets including "COVTYPE" (0.5M points in 54dimensions), "SUSY" (4.5M points in 8 dimensions) and "MNIST"(2M points in 784 dimensions) using shared and distributed memory parallelism. In our largest run we approximately factorize a dense matrix of size 32M × 32M (generated from points in 64 dimensions) on 4,096 Sandy-Bridge cores. To our knowledge these results improve the state of the art by several orders of magnitude.
Chenhan D. Yu, William B. March, Bo Xiao 0001, George Biros
IPDPS3
2015 An Algebraic Parallel Treecode in Arbitrary Dimensions
abstract
We present a parallel tree code for fast kernel summation in high dimensions -- a common problem in data analysis and computational statistics. Fast kernel summations can be viewed as approximation schemes for dense kernel matrices. Tree code algorithms (or simply tree codes) construct low-rank approximations of certain off-diagonal blocks of the kernel matrix. These blocks are identified with the help of spatial data structures, typically trees. There is extensive work on tree codes and their parallelization for kernel summations in three dimensions, but there is little work on high-dimensional problems. Recently, we introduced a novel tree code, ASKIT, which resolves most of the shortcomings of existing methods. We introduce novel parallel algorithms for ASKIT, derive complexity estimates, and demonstrate scalability on synthetic, scientific, and image datasets. In particular, we introduce a local essential tree construction that extends to arbitrary dimensions in a scalable manner. We introduce data transformations for memory locality and use GPU acceleration. We report results on the "Maverick" and "Stampede" systems at the Texas Advanced Computing Centre. Our largest computations involve two billion points in 64 dimensions on 32, 768 x86 cores and 8 million points in 784 dimensions on 16, 384 x86 cores.
William B. March, Bo Xiao 0001, Chenhan D. Yu, George Biros
IPDPS2
2015 Robust Treecode Approximation for Kernel Machines
abstract
Since exact evaluation of a kernel matrix requires O(N2) work, scalable learning algorithms using kernels must approximate the kernel matrix. This approximation must be robust to the kernel parameters, for example the bandwidth for the Gaussian kernel. We consider two approximation methods: Nystrom and an algebraic treecode developed in our group. Nystrom methods construct a global low-rank approximation of the kernel matrix. Treecodes approximate just the off-diagonal blocks, typically using a hierarchical decomposition.
William B. March, Bo Xiao 0001, Sameer Tharakan, Chenhan D. Yu, George Biros
KDD2
2015 A kernel-independent FMM in general dimensions
abstract
We introduce a general-dimensional, kernel-independent, algebraic fast multipole method and apply it to kernel regression. The motivation for this work is the approximation of kernel matrices, which appear in mathematical physics, approximation theory, non-parametric statistics, and machine learning. Existing fast multipole methods are asymptotically optimal, but the underlying constants scale quite badly with the ambient space dimension. We introduce a method that mitigates this shortcoming; it only requires kernel evaluations and scales well with the problem size, the number of processors, and the ambient dimension---as long as the intrinsic dimension of the dataset is small. We test the performance of our method on several synthetic datasets. As a highlight, our largest run was on an image dataset with 10 million points in 246 dimensions.
William B. March, Bo Xiao 0001, Sameer Tharakan, Chenhan D. Yu, George Biros
SC2
2015 Performance optimization for the k-nearest neighbors kernel on x86 architectures
abstract
Nearest neighbor search is a cornerstone problem in computational geometry, non-parametric statistics, and machine learning. For N points, exhaustive search requires quadratic work, but many fast algorithms reduce the complexity for exact and approximate searches. The common kernel (kNN kernel) in all these algorithms solves many small-size problems exactly using exhaustive search. We propose an efficient implementation and performance analysis for the kNN kernel on x86 architectures. By fusing the distance calculation with the neighbor selection, we are able to utilize memory throughput. We present an analysis of the algorithm and explain parameter selection. We perform an experimental study varying the size of the problem, the dimension of the dataset, and the number of nearest neighbors. Overall we observe significant speedups. For example, when searching for 16 neighbors in a point dataset with 1.6 million points in 64 dimensions, our kernel is over 4 times faster than existing methods.
Chenhan D. Yu, Woody Austin, Bo Xiao 0001, George Biros
SC4