VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Readman Chiu
dblp:92/770
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-2215-5535ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Fusion-Bloom: fusion detection in assembled transcriptomes · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
gene fusion detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Fusion-Bloom: fusion detection in assembled transcriptomes · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly
transcriptome assembly |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Fusion-Bloom: fusion detection in assembled transcriptomes · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › physical mapping
clone ordering |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Automated ordering of fingerprinted clones · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › genome analysis
genome mapping |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Automated ordering of fingerprinted clones · Bioinform. 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
structural variant calling · 0.4de novo transcriptome assembly · 0.4simulation · 0.0fingerprint-based physical mapping · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Fusion-Bloom: fusion detection in assembled transcriptomesabstractSUMMARY: Presence or absence of gene fusions is one of the most important diagnostic markers in many cancer types. Consequently, fusion detection methods using various genomics data types, such as RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) are valuable tools for research and clinical applications. While information-rich RNA-seq data have proven to be instrumental in discovery of a number of hallmark fusion events, bioinformatics tools to detect fusions still have room for improvement. Here, we present Fusion-Bloom, a fusion detection method that leverages recent developments in de novo transcriptome assembly and assembly-based structural variant calling technologies (RNA-Bloom and PAVFinder, respectively). We benchmarked Fusion-Bloom against the performance of five other state-of-the-art fusion detection tools using multiple datasets. Overall, we observed Fusion-Bloom to display a good balance between detection sensitivity and specificity. We expect the tool to find applications in translational research and clinical genomics pipelines. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Fusion-Bloom is implemented as a UNIX Make utility, available at https://github.com/bcgsc/pavfinder and released under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Readman Chiu, Ka Ming Nip, Inanç Birol |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2004 | Automated ordering of fingerprinted clonesabstractMOTIVATION: A considerable amount of human intervention is currently required to produce high-quality fingerprint-based physical maps for genomic studies. RESULTS: An algorithm has been developed and implemented to automatically order fingerprinted clones within contigs. The resulting software, named CORAL (Clone ORdering ALgorithm), has been tested on maps that have previously been manually edited and on maps derived from in silico simulations. The fingerprint map and DNA sequence of the human genome has provided an additional test to CORAL. Measurements suggest that CORAL performs significantly better than the software currently used by most laboratories to order fingerprinted clones at throughputs far exceeding those that can be achieved manually. Stephane Flibotte, Readman Chiu, Chris Fjell, Martin Krzywinski, Jacqueline E. Schein, Heesun Shin, Marco A. Marra |
Bioinform. | 2 |