Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shanshan Huang 0002

dblp:92/8363-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-4018-820XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 50% Language models and text generation · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization › opinion summarization
aspect-based summarization
0.312018
ExtRA: Extracting Prominent Review Aspects from Customer Feedback · EMNLP 2018
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sentiment analysis › aspect-based sentiment analysis
aspect extraction
0.312018
ExtRA: Extracting Prominent Review Aspects from Customer Feedback · EMNLP 2018
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sentiment analysis
review mining
0.312018
ExtRA: Extracting Prominent Review Aspects from Customer Feedback · EMNLP 2018
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization
0.312018
ExtRA: Extracting Prominent Review Aspects from Customer Feedback · EMNLP 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

unsupervised extraction · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Combating Short Circuit Behavior in Natural Language Reasoning: Crossover and Mutation Operations for Enhanced Robustness
abstract
In this study, we delve into the “short circuit” phenomenon observed in multiple-choice natural language reasoning tasks, where models tend to make accurate choices without properly considering the context of the question. To better understand this phenomenon, we propose white-box and black-box proxy tests as investigative tools to detect short circuit behavior, confirming its presence in fine-tuned NLU reasoning models. To tackle the short circuit issue, we introduce biologically inspired “crossover” and “mutation” operations. These operations are applied to augment the training data for popular models such as BERT, XLNet, and RoBERTa. Our results demonstrate that these data augmentation techniques effectively enhance the models’ robustness and mitigate the short circuit problem.
Shanshan Huang 0002, Kenny Q. Zhu
ECAI1
2023 Can You Really Reason: A Novel Framework for Assessing Natural Language Reasoning Datasets and Models
Shanshan Huang 0002
ICONIP (15)1
2020 Enhanced Story Representation by ConceptNet for Predicting Story Endings
abstract
Predicting endings for narrative stories is a grand challenge for machine commonsense reasoning. The task requires ac- curate representation of the story semantics and structured logic knowledge. Pre-trained language models, such as BERT, made progress recently in this task by exploiting spurious statistical patterns in the test dataset, instead of 'understanding' the stories per se. In this paper, we propose to improve the representation of stories by first simplifying the sentences to some key concepts and second modeling the latent relation- ship between the key ideas within the story. Such enhanced sentence representation, when used with pre-trained language models, makes substantial gains in prediction accuracy on the popular Story Cloze Test without utilizing the biased validation data.
Shanshan Huang 0002, Kenny Q. Zhu, Qianzi Liao, Libin Shen, Yinggong Zhao
CIKM1
2019 Knowledge empowered prominent aspect extraction from product reviews
Zhiyi Luo, Shanshan Huang 0002, Kenny Q. Zhu
Inf. Process. Manag.2
2018 ExtRA: Extracting Prominent Review Aspects from Customer Feedback
abstract
Many existing systems for analyzing and summarizing customer reviews about products or service are based on a number of prominent review aspects.Conventionally, the prominent review aspects of a product type are determined manually.This costly approach cannot scale to large and cross-domain services such as Amazon.com,Taobao.com or Yelp.comwhere there are a large number of product types and new products emerge almost everyday.In this paper, we propose a novel framework, for extracting the most prominent aspects of a given product type from textual reviews.The proposed framework, ExtRA, extracts K most prominent aspect terms or phrases which do not overlap semantically automatically without supervision.Extensive experiments show that ExtRA is effective and achieves the state-of-the-art performance on a dataset consisting of different product types.
Zhiyi Luo, Shanshan Huang 0002, Frank F. Xu, Bill Y. Lin, Hanyuan Shi, Kenny Q. Zhu
EMNLP2