Background: Selecting the ideal code reviewer in modern code review is a crucial first step to perform effective code reviews. There are several algorithms proposed in the literature for recommending the ideal code reviewer for a given pull request. The success of these code reviewer recommendation algorithms is measured by comparing the recommended reviewers with the ground truth that is the assigned reviewers selected in real life. However, in practice, the assigned reviewer may not be the ideal reviewer for a given pull request.Aims: In this study, we investigate the validity of ground truth data in code reviewer recommendation studies.Method: By conducting an informal literature review, we compared the reviewer selection heuristics in real life and the algorithms used in recommendation models. We further support our claims by using empirical data from code reviewer recommendation studies.Results: By literature review, and accompanying empirical data, we show that ground truth data used in code reviewer recommendation studies is potentially problematic. This reduces the validity of the code reviewer datasets and the reviewer recommendation studies. Conclusion: We demonstrated the cases where the ground truth in code reviewer recommendation studies are invalid and discussed the potential solutions to address this issue.

We propose a new method for human pose estimation which leverages information from multiple views to impose a strong prior on articulated pose. The novelty of the method concerns the types of coherence modelled. Consistency is maximised over the different views through different terms modelling classical geometric information (coherence of the resulting poses) as well as appearance information which is modelled as latent variables in the global energy function. Moreover, adequacy of each view is assessed and their contributions are adjusted accordingly. Experiments on the HumanEva and Utrecht multi‐person motion datasets show that the proposed method significantly decreases the estimation error compared to single‐view results.

We propose a new method for activity recognition based on a view independent representation of human motion. Robust 3D volume motion templates (VMTs) are calculated from tracklets. View independence is achieved through a rotation with respect to a canonical orientation. From this volumes, features based on 3D gradients are extracted, projected to a codebook and pooled into a bags-of-words model classified with an SVM classifier. Experiments show that the method outperforms the original HoG3D method.