Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Robert H. Krambeck

dblp:93/128 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1983
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Electronic design automation · 75% Integrated circuit design · 25%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › physical design › VLSI layout
gate matrix layout
0.021983
Gate Matrix Layout of Random Control Logic in a 32-bit CMOS CPU Chip Adaptable to Evolving Logic Design · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1983
Gate matrix layout of random control logic in a 32-bit CMOS CPU chip adaptable to evolving logic design · DAC 1982
Electronic design automation
physical design
0.021983
Gate Matrix Layout of Random Control Logic in a 32-bit CMOS CPU Chip Adaptable to Evolving Logic Design · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1983
Gate matrix layout of random control logic in a 32-bit CMOS CPU chip adaptable to evolving logic design · DAC 1982
Integrated circuit design
digital circuit design
0.011982
Gate matrix layout of random control logic in a 32-bit CMOS CPU chip adaptable to evolving logic design · DAC 1982

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

top-down hierarchical design · 0.0computer-aided layout · 0.0gate matrix layout technique · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1983 Gate Matrix Layout of Random Control Logic in a 32-bit CMOS CPU Chip Adaptable to Evolving Logic Design
abstract
BELLMAC-32A is a single-chip fully 32-bit high-end microprocessor designed in 2.5-?m twin-tub CMOS technology. This paper describes the gate matrix layout of random control logic in BELLMAC-32A with top-down hierarchical design methodology. The gate matrix layout provided (1) parallel team layout efforts, (2) adaptability to evolving logic design with short turnaround time, (3) high packing density competitive with hand layout, (4) compatibility with computer-aided layout and verification tools, (5) capability to fine-tune circuits, and (6) technology updatability. It took 6.5 engineer-years to complete the layout of random control logic with 7000 transistors although the logic design was continuously evolving during the layout period. The average packing density of gate matrix layout was 1500 ?m2 per transistor in random logic and 840 ?m2 per transistor in data path. BELLMAC-32A had more-than-three times performance improvement over its 3.5 ?m technology prototype chip BELLMAC-32, in which random control logic was implemented with polycells.
Robert H. Krambeck, Hung-Fai Stephen Law, Alexander D. Lopez
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.2
1982 Gate matrix layout of random control logic in a 32-bit CMOS CPU chip adaptable to evolving logic design
abstract
Previously the gate matrix technique was used to lay out the RALU section of a CMOS 32-bit CPU chip. It took 1.2 Engineer-Years to complete the layout of the RALU that contained more than 20,000 transistors with multiple-bus structure. The average packing density was 840 μm2 per transistor in 2.5 μm design rules. Recently we have applied the gate matrix technique to lay out the highly complex "random control logic" of the CPU. With a well-structured layout strategy, the gate matrix layout provided (1) adaptability to evolving logic design with short turnaround times, (2) compatibility with computer aids in layout verification, (3) high packing density competitive with hand layout, and (4) compatibility with a team approach to layout. It took 6.5 Engineer-Years to complete the error-free layout of over 7,000 transistors although the logic design was continuously evolving during the layout period. More than half of the layout efforts were due to logic changes. The average packing density in the final layout of the random control logic was about 1,500 μm2 per transistor with 2.5 μm design rules.
Robert H. Krambeck, Hung-Fai Stephen Law
DAC2