Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gavin Brown 0003

dblp:93/2057-3 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
7as first author
9since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 6 first-author · 8 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 26% Learning theory · 22% Learning paradigms · 17%
Network and information security
4 papers
Privacy and data protection · 89% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 11%
Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Algorithms and data structures · 50% Mathematical optimization · 28% Computational complexity · 22%

Topics — the 18 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
2.742024
Private Gradient Descent for Linear Regression: Tighter Error Bounds and Instance-Specific Uncertainty Estimation · ICML 2024
Insufficient Statistics Perturbation: Stable Estimators for Private Least Squares Extended Abstract · COLT 2024
Fast, Sample-Efficient, Affine-Invariant Private Mean and Covariance Estimation for Subgaussian Distributions · COLT 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning
0.812024
Metalearning with Very Few Samples Per Task · COLT 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › joint representation learning › multi-task representation learning
shared representation learning
0.812024
Metalearning with Very Few Samples Per Task · COLT 2024
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private learning
differentially private linear regression
0.812024
Insufficient Statistics Perturbation: Stable Estimators for Private Least Squares Extended Abstract · COLT 2024
Mathematical optimization
least squares
0.812024
Insufficient Statistics Perturbation: Stable Estimators for Private Least Squares Extended Abstract · COLT 2024
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
linear regression
0.812024
Private Gradient Descent for Linear Regression: Tighter Error Bounds and Instance-Specific Uncertainty Estimation · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › incremental learning
streaming learning
0.612022
Strong Memory Lower Bounds for Learning Natural Models · COLT 2022
Computational complexity
space complexity
0.612022
Strong Memory Lower Bounds for Learning Natural Models · COLT 2022
Algorithms and data structures › data streams
streaming algorithms
0.612022
Strong Memory Lower Bounds for Learning Natural Models · COLT 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
privacy
0.512021
When is memorization of irrelevant training data necessary for high-accuracy learning? · STOC 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
training data memorization
0.512021
When is memorization of irrelevant training data necessary for high-accuracy learning? · STOC 2021
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › private statistical estimation
private mean estimation
0.512021
Covariance-Aware Private Mean Estimation Without Private Covariance Estimation · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation › confidence estimation
confidence interval estimation
0.212024
Private Gradient Descent for Linear Regression: Tighter Error Bounds and Instance-Specific Uncertainty Estimation · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning
0.212024
Metalearning with Very Few Samples Per Task · COLT 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical estimation
0.212023
Fast, Sample-Efficient, Affine-Invariant Private Mean and Covariance Estimation for Subgaussian Distributions · COLT 2023
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › linear model
linear classifier
0.212022
Strong Memory Lower Bounds for Learning Natural Models · COLT 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification › linear classification
sparse linear classifier
0.212022
Strong Memory Lower Bounds for Learning Natural Models · COLT 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
0.112021
Covariance-Aware Private Mean Estimation Without Private Covariance Estimation · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

gradient descent · 2.3adaptive gradient clipping · 2.3noise addition · 1.5insufficient statistics perturbation · 1.5stable estimation · 1.3matrix multiplication · 1.3one-pass streaming · 1.1noise calibration · 1.0exponential mechanism · 1.0sample complexity theory · 0.8distribution-free learning · 0.8lower bound arguments · 0.6lower bound argument · 0.6tukey depth · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Insufficient Statistics Perturbation: Stable Estimators for Private Least Squares Extended Abstract
abstract
We present a sample- and time-efficient differentially private algorithm for ordinary least squares, with error that depends linearly on the dimension and is independent of the condition number of $X^\top X$, where $X$ is the design matrix. All prior private algorithms for this task require either $d^{3/2}$ examples, error growing polynomially with the condition number, or exponential time. Our near-optimal accuracy guarantee holds for any dataset with bounded statistical leverage and bounded residuals. Technically, we build on the approach of Brown et al. (2023) for private mean estimation, adding scaled noise to a carefully designed stable nonprivate estimator of the empirical regression vector.
Gavin Brown 0003, Jonathan Hayase, Sam Hopkins 0001, Weihao Kong, Sewoong Oh, Juan C. Perdomo, Adam D. Smith 0001
COLT1
2024 Metalearning with Very Few Samples Per Task
abstract
Metalearning and multitask learning are two frameworks for solving a group of related learning tasks more efficiently than we could hope to solve each of the individual tasks on their own. In multitask learning, we are given a fixed set of related learning tasks and need to output one accurate model per task, whereas in metalearning we are given tasks that are drawn i.i.d. from a metadistribution and need to output some common information that can be easily specialized to new, previously unseen tasks from the metadistribution. In this work, we consider a binary classification setting where tasks are related by a shared representation, that is, every task $P$ of interest can be solved by a classifier of the form $f_{P} \circ h$ where $h \in \mathcal{H}$ is a map from features to some representation space that is shared across tasks, and $f_{P} \in \mathcal{F}$ is a task-specific classifier from the representation space to labels. The main question we ask in this work is how much data do we need to metalearn a good representation? Here, the amount of data is measured in terms of both the number of tasks $t$ that we need to see and the number of samples $n$ per task. We focus on the regime where the number of samples per task is extremely small. Our main result shows that, in a distribution-free setting where the feature vectors are in $\mathbb{R}^d$, the representation is a linear map from $\mathbb{R}^d \to \mathbb{R}^k$, and the task-specific classifiers are halfspaces in $\mathbb{R}^k$, we can metalearn a representation with error $\varepsilon$ using just $n = k+2$ samples per task, and $d \cdot (1/\varepsilon)^{O(k)}$ tasks. Learning with so few samples per task is remarkable because metalearning would be impossible with $k+1$ samples per task, and because we cannot even hope to learn an accurate task-specific classifier with just $k+2$ samples per task. To obtain this result, we develop a sample-and-task-complexity theory for distribution-free metalearning and multitask learning, which identifies what properties of $\mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{H}$ make metalearning possible with few samples per task. Our theory also yields a simple characterization of distribution-free multitask learning. Finally, we give sample-efficient reductions between metalearning and multitask learning, which, when combined with our characterization of multitask learning, give a characterization of metalearning in certain parameter regimes.
Maryam Aliakbarpour, Konstantina Bairaktari, Gavin Brown 0003, Adam D. Smith 0001, Nathan Srebro, Jonathan R. Ullman
COLT3
2024 Private Gradient Descent for Linear Regression: Tighter Error Bounds and Instance-Specific Uncertainty Estimation
abstract
We provide an improved analysis of standard differentially private gradient descent for linear regression under the squared error loss. Under modest assumptions on the input, we characterize the distribution of the iterate at each time step. Our analysis leads to new results on the algorithm’s accuracy: for a proper fixed choice of hyperparameters, the sample complexity depends only linearly on the dimension of the data. This matches the dimension-dependence of the (non-private) ordinary least squares estimator as well as that of recent private algorithms that rely on sophisticated adaptive gradient-clipping schemes (Varshney et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2023). Our analysis of the iterates’ distribution also allows us to construct confidence intervals for the empirical optimizer which adapt automatically to the variance of the algorithm on a particular data set. We validate our theorems through experiments on synthetic data.
Gavin Brown 0003, Krishnamurthy Dvijotham, Georgina Evans, Daogao Liu, Adam D. Smith 0001, Abhradeep Thakurta
ICML1
2023 Fast, Sample-Efficient, Affine-Invariant Private Mean and Covariance Estimation for Subgaussian Distributions
abstract
We present a fast, differentially private algorithm for high-dimensional covariance-aware mean estimation with nearly optimal sample complexity. Only exponential-time estimators were previously known to achieve this guarantee. Given $n$ samples from a (sub-)Gaussian distribution with unknown mean $\mu$ and covariance $\Sigma$, our $(\epsilon,\delta)$-differentially private estimator produces $\tilde{\mu}$ such that $\|\mu - \tilde{\mu}\|_{\Sigma} \leq \alpha$ as long as $n \gtrsim \tfrac d {\alpha^2} + \tfrac{d \sqrt{\log 1/\delta}}{\alpha \epsilon}+\frac{d\log 1/\delta}{\epsilon}$. The Mahalanobis error metric $\|\mu - \hat{\mu}\|_{\Sigma}$ measures the distance between $\hat \mu$ and $\mu$ relative to $\Sigma$; it characterizes the error of the sample mean. Our algorithm runs in time $\tilde{O}(nd^{\omega - 1} + nd/\eps)$, where $\omega < 2.38$ is the matrix multiplication exponent.We adapt an exponential-time approach of Brown, Gaboardi, Smith, Ullman, and Zakynthinou (2021), giving efficient variants of stable mean and covariance estimation subroutines that also improve the sample complexity to the nearly optimal bound above.Our stable covariance estimator can be turned to private covariance estimation for unrestricted subgaussian distributions. With $n\gtrsim d^{3/2}$ samples, our estimate is accurate in spectral norm. This is the first such algorithm using $n= o(d^2)$ samples, answering an open question posed by Alabi et al. (2022). With $n\gtrsim d^2$ samples, our estimate is accurate in Frobenius norm. This leads to a fast, nearly optimal algorithm for private learning of unrestricted Gaussian distributions in TV distance.Duchi, Haque, and Kuditipudi (2023) obtained similar results independently and concurrently.
Gavin Brown 0003, Sam Hopkins 0001, Adam D. Smith 0001
COLT1
2022 Performative Prediction in a Stateful World
abstract
Deployed supervised machine learning models make predictions that interact with and influence the world. This phenomenon is called performative prediction by Perdomo et al. (ICML 2020). It is an ongoing challenge to understand the influence of such predictions as well as design tools so as to control that influence. We propose a theoretical framework where the response of a target population to the deployed classifier is modeled as a function of the classifier and the current state (distribution) of the population. We show necessary and sufficient conditions for convergence to an equilibrium of two retraining algorithms, repeated risk minimization and a lazier variant. Furthermore, convergence is near an optimal classifier. We thus generalize results of Perdomo et al., whose performativity framework does not assume any dependence on the state of the target population. A particular phenomenon captured by our model is that of distinct groups that acquire information and resources at different rates to be able to respond to the latest deployed classifier. We study this phenomenon theoretically and empirically.
Gavin Brown 0003, Shlomi Hod, Iden Kalemaj
AISTATS1
2022 Strong Memory Lower Bounds for Learning Natural Models
abstract
We give lower bounds on the amount of memory required by a one-pass streaming algorithms for solving several natural learning problems. In a setting where examples lie in $\{0,1\}^d$ and the optimal classifier can be encoded using $\kappa$ bits, we show that algorithms which learn to constant error using a near-minimal number of examples, $\tilde O(\kappa)$, must use $\tilde \Omega( d\kappa)$ bits of space. Our space bounds match the dimension of the ambient space of the problem’s natural parametrization, even when it is quadratic in the size of examples and the final classifier. For instance, in the setting of $d$-sparse linear classifiers over degree-2 polynomial features, for which $\kappa=\Theta(d\log d)$, our space lower bound is $\tilde\Omega(d^2)$. Our bounds degrade gracefully with the stream length $N$, generally having the form $\tilde\Omega(d\kappa \cdot \frac{\kappa}{N})$. Bounds of the form $\Omega(d\kappa)$ were known for learning parity and other problems defined over finite fields. Bounds that apply in a narrow range of sample sizes are also known for linear regression. Ours are the first such bounds for problems of the type commonly seen in recent learning applications that apply for for a large range of input sizes.
Gavin Brown 0003, Mark Bun, Adam D. Smith 0001
COLT1
2021 Mixed Spatio-Temporal Neural Networks on Real-time Prediction of Crimes
abstract
Forecasting the crime rate in real-time is always an important task to public safety. However, there are no known models that provide satisfactory approximation to this complex spatio-temporal problem until recently. The crime rate may be affected by various factors, such as local education, public events, weather, etc. Such factors make the prediction of crimes more complex and challenging than other problems that are less influenced by outer factors. In this paper, we propose a deep-learning-based approach, which combines various methods in neural networks to handle the spatial temporal prediction problem. Some optimization techniques, such as Bayesian optimization, are applied for finding the optimal hyper-parameters as well as dealing with noises in the dataset. The model is trained on a dataset about crime information in Los Angeles at a scale of hours in block-divided areas, released by the LA Police Department (LAPD). The results of experiments on this dataset demonstrates the proposed model’s ability in predicting potential crimes in real time.
Xiao Zhou 0016, Xiao Wang 0028, Gavin Brown 0003, Chengchen Wang, Sang (Peter) Chin
ICMLA3
2021 Covariance-Aware Private Mean Estimation Without Private Covariance Estimation
abstract
We present two sample-efficient differentially private mean estimators for $d$-dimensional (sub)Gaussian distributions with unknown covariance. Informally, given $n \gtrsim d/\alpha^2$ samples from such a distribution with mean $\mu$ and covariance $\Sigma$, our estimators output $\tilde\mu$ such that $\| \tilde\mu - \mu \|_{\Sigma} \leq \alpha$, where $\| \cdot \|_{\Sigma}$ is the \emph{Mahalanobis distance}. All previous estimators with the same guarantee either require strong a priori bounds on the covariance matrix or require $\Omega(d^{3/2})$ samples. Each of our estimators is based on a simple, general approach to designing differentially private mechanisms, but with novel technical steps to make the estimator private and sample-efficient. Our first estimator samples a point with approximately maximum Tukey depth using the exponential mechanism, but restricted to the set of points of large Tukey depth. Proving that this mechanism is private requires a novel analysis. Our second estimator perturbs the empirical mean of the data set with noise calibrated to the empirical covariance. Only the mean is released, however; the covariance is only used internally. Its sample complexity guarantees hold more generally for subgaussian distributions, albeit with a slightly worse dependence on the privacy parameter. For both estimators, careful preprocessing of the data is required to satisfy differential privacy.
Gavin Brown 0003, Marco Gaboardi, Adam D. Smith 0001, Jonathan R. Ullman, Lydia Zakynthinou
NeurIPS1
2021 When is memorization of irrelevant training data necessary for high-accuracy learning?
abstract
Modern machine learning models are complex and frequently encode surprising amounts of information about individual inputs. In extreme cases, complex models appear to memorize entire input examples, including seemingly irrelevant information (social security numbers from text, for example). In this paper, we aim to understand whether this sort of memorization is necessary for accurate learning. We describe natural prediction problems in which every sufficiently accurate training algorithm must encode, in the prediction model, essentially all the information about a large subset of its training examples. This remains true even when the examples are high-dimensional and have entropy much higher than the sample size, and even when most of that information is ultimately irrelevant to the task at hand. Further, our results do not depend on the training algorithm or the class of models used for learning.
Gavin Brown 0003, Mark Bun, Vitaly Feldman, Adam D. Smith 0001, Kunal Talwar
STOC1
2017 A Mathematical Analysis of Network Controllability Through Driver Nodes
abstract
A May 2011 Nature article by Liu, Slotine, and Barabasi laid a mathematical foundation for analyzing network controllability of self-organizing networks and how to identify the minimum number of nodes needed to control a network, or driver nodes. In this paper, we continue to explore this topic, beginning with a look at how Laplacian eigenvalues relate to the percentage of nodes required to control a network. Next, we define and analyze super driver nodes, or those driver nodes that survive graph randomization. Finally, we examine node properties to differentiate super driver nodes from other types of nodes in a graph.
Sang (Peter) Chin, Alison Albin, Mykola Hayvanovych, Elizabeth Reilly, Gavin Brown 0003, Jacob Harer
IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst.6