Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rajan Patel

dblp:93/2699 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › query log analysis
clickthrough data
0.112010
Beyond position bias: examining result attractiveness as a source of presentation bias in clickthrough data · WWW 2010
Information retrieval › user behavior › search behavior › click model
position bias
0.112010
Beyond position bias: examining result attractiveness as a source of presentation bias in clickthrough data · WWW 2010
Information retrieval › web search
mobile search
0.112009
Computers and iphones and mobile phones, oh my!: a logs-based comparison of search users on different devices · WWW 2009
Information retrieval › user behavior
search behavior
0.112009
Computers and iphones and mobile phones, oh my!: a logs-based comparison of search users on different devices · WWW 2009
Information retrieval › evaluation › online evaluation
click-based evaluation
0.012010
Beyond position bias: examining result attractiveness as a source of presentation bias in clickthrough data · WWW 2010
Information retrieval
evaluation
0.012010
Beyond position bias: examining result attractiveness as a source of presentation bias in clickthrough data · WWW 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

click-through data analysis · 0.1bias detection · 0.1query log analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Beyond position bias: examining result attractiveness as a source of presentation bias in clickthrough data
abstract
Leveraging clickthrough data has become a popular approach for evaluating and optimizing information retrieval systems. Although data is plentiful, one must take care when interpreting clicks, since user behavior can be affected by various sources of presentation bias. While the issue of position bias in clickthrough data has been the topic of much study, other presentation bias effects have received comparatively little attention. For instance, since users must decide whether to click on a result based on its summary (e.g., the title, URL and abstract), one might expect clicks to favor "more attractive" results. In this paper, we examine result summary attractiveness as a potential source of presentation bias. This study distinguishes itself from prior work by aiming to detect systematic biases in click behavior due to attractive summaries inflating perceived relevance. Our experiments conducted on the Google web search engine show substantial evidence of presentation bias in clicks towards results with more attractive titles.
Yisong Yue, Rajan Patel, Hein Roehrig
WWW2
2009 Computers and iphones and mobile phones, oh my!: a logs-based comparison of search users on different devices
abstract
We present a logs-based comparison of search patterns across three platforms: computers, iPhones and conventional phones. Our goal is to understand how search users differ from computer-based search users, and we focus heavily on the distribution and variability of tasks that users perform from each platform. The results suggest that search usage is much more focused for the average user than for the average computer-based user. However, search behavior on high-end phones resembles computer-based search behavior more so than search behavior. A wide variety of implications follow from these findings. First, there is no single search interface which is suitable for all phones. We suggest that for the higher-end phones, a close integration with the standard computer-based interface (in terms of personalization and available feature set) would be beneficial for the user, since these phones seem to be treated as an extension of the users' computer. For all other phones, there is a huge opportunity for personalizing the search experience for the user's mobile needs, as these users are likely to repeatedly search for a single type of information need on their phone.
Maryam Kamvar, Melanie Kellar, Rajan Patel, Ya Xu
WWW3
2007 Wavelet Image Interpolation (WII): A Wavelet-Based Approach to Enhancement of Digital Mammography Images
Gordana Derado, F. DuBois Bowman, Rajan Patel, Mary Newell, Brani Vidakovic
ISBRA3