In this work, we explore and propose several quantum circuit mapping strategies to optimize qubit shuttling in scalable quantum computing architectures based on silicon spin qubits. Our goal is to minimize phase errors introduced during shuttling operations while reducing the overall execution time of quantum circuits. We propose and evaluate five mapping algorithms using benchmarks from quantum algorithms. The Swap Return strategy emerged as the most robust solution, offering a superior balance between execution time and error minimization by considering future qubit interactions. Additionally, we assess the importance of initial qubit placement, demonstrating that an informed placement strategy can significantly enhance the performance of dynamic mapping approaches.

Recent approaches to automatic parallelization have taken advantage of the low-latency on-chip interconnect provided in modern multicore processors, demonstrating significant speedups, even for complex workloads. Although these techniques can already extract significant thread-level parallelism from application loops, we are interested in quantifying and exploiting any additional performance that remains on the table. This paper confirms the existence of significant extra thread-level parallelism within loops parallelized by the HELIX compiler. However, improving static data dependence analysis is unable to reach the additional performance offered because the existing loop-carried dependences are true only on a small subset of loop iterations. We therefore develop three approaches to take advantage of the transient nature of these data dependences through speculation, via transactional memory support. Results show that coupling the state-of-the-art data dependence analysis with fine-grained speculation achieves most of the speedups and may help close the gap towards the limit of HELIX-style thread-level parallelism.

We investigate computing models that are presented as families of finite computing devices with a uniformity condition on the entire family. Examples of such models include Boolean circuits, membrane systems, DNA computers, chemical reaction networks