Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stephen R. McConnel

dblp:93/4435 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1982
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 78% Performance modeling and evaluation · 8% Distributed systems · 7%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
reliability analysis
0.011982
Derivation and Calibration of a Transient Error Reliability Model · IEEE Trans. Computers 1982
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › redundancy
redundant systems
0.011981
Synchronization and Voting · IEEE Trans. Computers 1981
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization
0.011982
Derivation and Calibration of a Transient Error Reliability Model · IEEE Trans. Computers 1982
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.011981
Synchronization and Voting · IEEE Trans. Computers 1981
Parallel and multicore computing
synchronization
0.011981
Synchronization and Voting · IEEE Trans. Computers 1981

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

weibull distribution · 0.0statistical testing · 0.0gaussian process · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1982 Derivation and Calibration of a Transient Error Reliability Model
abstract
In this paper a new modeling methodology to characterize failure processes in digital computers due to hardware transients is presented. The basic assumption made is that system sensitivity to hardware transient errors is a function of critical resources usage. The failure rate of a given resource is approximated by a deterministic function of time, depending on the average workload of that resource, plus a Gaussian process. The probability density function of the time to failure obtained under this assumption has a decreasing hazard function, explaining why decreasing hazard function densities such as the Weibull fit experimental data so well. Data on transient errors obtained from several systems are analyzed. Statistical tests confirm the good fit between decreasing hazard distributions and actual data. Finally, models of common fault-tolerant redundant structures are developed using decreasing hazard function distributions. The analysis indicates significant differences between reliability predictions based on the exponential distribution and those based on decreasing hazard function distributions. Reliability differences of 0.2 and factors greater than 2 in Mission Time Improvement are seen in model results. System designers should be aware of these differences.
Xavier Castillo, Stephen R. McConnel, Daniel P. Siewiorek
IEEE Trans. Computers2
1981 Synchronization and Voting
abstract
This is an elaboration of the paper `Synchronization and matching in redundant systems' by Davies and Wakerly (ibid., vol.27, p.531-9, 1978). The design of voters for synchronization is strongly dependent on the signaling convention used. This correspondence presents voter designs for three different signaling conventions (transition, level, and pulse). The issue of improved voter performance is also addressed.
Stephen R. McConnel, Daniel P. Siewiorek
IEEE Trans. Computers1