Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Parisa Tabriz

dblp:93/5018 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 4

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
4 papers
Web and mobile security · 60% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 20% Network security · 14%
Computer networks
1 paper
Network measurement and analytics · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Web and mobile security
web security
0.522019
Does Certificate Transparency Break the Web? Measuring Adoption and Error Rate · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2019
Measuring HTTPS Adoption on the Web · USENIX Security Symposium 2017
Web and mobile security › web PKI
certificate transparency
0.412019
Does Certificate Transparency Break the Web? Measuring Adoption and Error Rate · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2019
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key management
public key infrastructure
0.412019
Does Certificate Transparency Break the Web? Measuring Adoption and Error Rate · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2019
Network security › secure communication › secure communication protocol
TLS
0.112017
Where the Wild Warnings Are: Root Causes of Chrome HTTPS Certificate Errors · CCS 2017
Network security
anonymity networks
0.112007
Denial of service or denial of security? · CCS 2007
Network security › attack strategy
denial-of-service attack
0.112007
Denial of service or denial of security? · CCS 2007
Network security › wireless network security
malicious node resilience
0.012007
Denial of service or denial of security? · CCS 2007
Network security › anonymity networks
mix networks
0.012007
Denial of service or denial of security? · CCS 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

measurement study · 0.4field measurement · 0.3simulation · 0.1probabilistic modeling · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Does Certificate Transparency Break the Web? Measuring Adoption and Error Rate
abstract
Certificate Transparency (CT) is an emerging system for enabling the rapid discovery of malicious or misissued certificates. Initially standardized in 2013, CT is now finally beginning to see widespread support. Although CT provides desirable security benefits, web browsers cannot begin requiring all websites to support CT at once, due to the risk of breaking large numbers of websites. We discuss challenges for deployment, analyze the adoption of CT on the web, and measure the error rates experienced by users of the Google Chrome web browser. We find that CT has so far been widely adopted with minimal breakage and warnings. Security researchers often struggle with the tradeoff between security and user frustration: rolling out new security requirements often causes breakage. We view CT as a case study for deploying ecosystem-wide change while trying to minimize end user impact. We discuss the design properties of CT that made its success possible, as well as draw lessons from its risks and pitfalls that could be avoided in future large-scale security deployments.
Emily Stark 0001, Ryan Sleevi, Rijad Muminovic, Devon O'Brien, Eran Messeri, Adrienne Porter Felt, Brendan McMillion, Parisa Tabriz
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy8
2017 Where the Wild Warnings Are: Root Causes of Chrome HTTPS Certificate Errors
abstract
HTTPS error warnings are supposed to alert browser users to network attacks. Unfortunately, a wide range of non-attack circumstances trigger hundreds of millions of spurious browser warnings per month. Spurious warnings frustrate users, hinder the widespread adoption of HTTPS, and undermine trust in browser warnings. We investigate the root causes of HTTPS error warnings in the field, with the goal of resolving benign errors.
Mustafa Emre Acer, Emily Stark 0001, Adrienne Porter Felt, Sascha Fahl, Radhika Bhargava, Bhanu Dev, Matt Braithwaite, Ryan Sleevi, Parisa Tabriz
CCS9
2017 Measuring HTTPS Adoption on the Web
Adrienne Porter Felt, Richard Barnes 0001, April King, Chris Palmer, Chris Bentzel, Parisa Tabriz
USENIX Security Symposium6
2007 Denial of service or denial of security?
abstract
We consider the effect attackers who disrupt anonymous communications have on the security of traditional high- and low-latency anonymous communication systems, as well as on the Hydra-Onion and Cashmere systems that aim to offer reliable mixing, and Salsa, a peer-to-peer anonymous communication network. We show that denial of service (DoS) lowers anonymity as messages need to get retransmitted to be delivered, presenting more opportunities for attack. We uncover a fundamental limit on the security of mix networks, showing that they cannot tolerate a majority of nodes being malicious. Cashmere, Hydra-Onion, and Salsa security is also badly affected by DoS attackers. Our results are backed by probabilistic modeling and extensive simulations and are of direct applicability to deployed anonymity systems.
Nikita Borisov, George Danezis, Prateek Mittal, Parisa Tabriz
CCS4