Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yiping Lu 0001
dblp:93/683-1
· DBLP profile ↗
14ranked-venue papers
4as first author
8since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-9459-699XORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 13 · 4 first-author · 8 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
10 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 34% Learning theory · 27% Optimization for machine learning · 16% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 88% Algorithms and data structures · 12% |
Topics — the 28 heaviest of 31, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
minimax optimality |
0.9 | 2 | 2023 | Minimax Optimal Kernel Operator Learning via Multilevel Training · ICLR 2023 When can Regression-Adjusted Control Variate Help? Rare Events, Sobolev Embedding and Minimax Optimality · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network
residual network |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | A Mean Field Analysis Of Deep ResNet And Beyond: Towards Provably Optimization Via Overparameterization From Depth · ICML 2020 Beyond Finite Layer Neural Networks: Bridging Deep Architectures and Numerical Differential Equations · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural network estimator |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Statistical Spatially Inhomogeneous Diffusion Inference · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
nonparametric estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Statistical Spatially Inhomogeneous Diffusion Inference · AAAI 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
bootstrap |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Orthogonal Bootstrap: Efficient Simulation of Input Uncertainty · ICML 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
uncertainty quantification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Orthogonal Bootstrap: Efficient Simulation of Input Uncertainty · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
control variates |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | When can Regression-Adjusted Control Variate Help? Rare Events, Sobolev Embedding and Minimax Optimality · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Minimax Optimal Kernel Operator Learning via Multilevel Training · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
monte carlo methods |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | When can Regression-Adjusted Control Variate Help? Rare Events, Sobolev Embedding and Minimax Optimality · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
operator learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Minimax Optimal Kernel Operator Learning via Multilevel Training · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
variance reduction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | When can Regression-Adjusted Control Variate Help? Rare Events, Sobolev Embedding and Minimax Optimality · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Machine Learning For Elliptic PDEs: Fast Rate Generalization Bound, Neural Scaling Law and Minimax Optimality · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization
gradient descent |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Sobolev Acceleration and Statistical Optimality for Learning Elliptic Equations via Gradient Descent · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural collapse |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | An Unconstrained Layer-Peeled Perspective on Neural Collapse · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scaling laws |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Machine Learning For Elliptic PDEs: Fast Rate Generalization Bound, Neural Scaling Law and Minimax Optimality · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss function design
sobolev training |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Sobolev Acceleration and Statistical Optimality for Learning Elliptic Equations via Gradient Descent · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computational science and engineering
inverse problem |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Sobolev Acceleration and Statistical Optimality for Learning Elliptic Equations via Gradient Descent · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning › physics-informed machine learning
physics-informed neural networks |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Sobolev Acceleration and Statistical Optimality for Learning Elliptic Equations via Gradient Descent · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory › statistical physics of learning
mean-field analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Mean Field Analysis Of Deep ResNet And Beyond: Towards Provably Optimization Via Overparameterization From Depth · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | You Only Propagate Once: Accelerating Adversarial Training via Maximal Principle · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | You Only Propagate Once: Accelerating Adversarial Training via Maximal Principle · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
robust optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | You Only Propagate Once: Accelerating Adversarial Training via Maximal Principle · NeurIPS 2019 |
Image and video processing
image restoration |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Dynamically Unfolding Recurrent Restorer: A Moving Endpoint Control Method for Image Restoration · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
physics-informed neural network |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | PDE-Net: Learning PDEs from Data · ICML 2018 |
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms
monte carlo methods |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Orthogonal Bootstrap: Efficient Simulation of Input Uncertainty · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › nonparametric regression
kernel regression |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Sobolev Acceleration and Statistical Optimality for Learning Elliptic Equations via Gradient Descent · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods
reproducing kernel hilbert space |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Sobolev Acceleration and Statistical Optimality for Learning Elliptic Equations via Gradient Descent · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation
minimax optimality |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Machine Learning For Elliptic PDEs: Fast Rate Generalization Bound, Neural Scaling Law and Minimax Optimality · ICLR 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural network · 1.5minimax optimal rate analysis · 1.5kernel integral operator · 1.1elliptic partial differential equations · 1.1monte carlo simulation · 0.8infinitesimal jackknife · 0.8sobolev embedding · 0.7quadrature · 0.7nonparametric regression · 0.7multilevel training · 0.7kernel methods · 0.7unconstrained layer-peeled model · 0.6sobolev norm · 0.6recurrent network · 0.4endpoint control · 0.4wavelet theory · 0.3sum rules of filters · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Statistical Spatially Inhomogeneous Diffusion InferenceabstractInferring a diffusion equation from discretely observed measurements is a statistical challenge of significant importance in a variety of fields, from single-molecule tracking in biophysical systems to modeling financial instruments. Assuming that the underlying dynamical process obeys a d-dimensional stochastic differential equation of the form dx_t = b(x_t)dt + \Sigma(x_t)dw_t, we propose neural network-based estimators of both the drift b and the spatially-inhomogeneous diffusion tensor D = \Sigma\Sigma^T/2 and provide statistical convergence guarantees when b and D are s-Hölder continuous. Notably, our bound aligns with the minimax optimal rate N^{-\frac{2s}{2s+d}} for nonparametric function estimation even in the presence of correlation within observational data, which necessitates careful handling when establishing fast-rate generalization bounds. Our theoretical results are bolstered by numerical experiments demonstrating accurate inference of spatially-inhomogeneous diffusion tensors. Yinuo Ren, Yiping Lu 0001, Lexing Ying, Grant M. Rotskoff |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2024 | Orthogonal Bootstrap: Efficient Simulation of Input UncertaintyabstractBootstrap is a popular methodology for simulating input uncertainty. However, it can be computationally expensive when the number of samples is large. We propose a new approach called Orthogonal Bootstrap that reduces the number of required Monte Carlo replications. We decomposes the target being simulated into two parts: the non-orthogonal part which has a closed-form result known as Infinitesimal Jackknife and the orthogonal part which is easier to be simulated. We theoretically and numerically show that Orthogonal Bootstrap significantly reduces the computational cost of Bootstrap while improving empirical accuracy and maintaining the same width of the constructed interval. Kaizhao Liu, Jose H. Blanchet, Lexing Ying, Yiping Lu 0001 |
ICML | 4 |
| 2023 | Adversarial Noises Are Linearly Separable for (Nearly) Random Neural NetworksabstractAdversarial example, which is usually generated by adding imperceptible adversarial noise to a clean sample, is ubiquitous for neural networks. In this paper we unveil a surprising property of adversarial noises when they are put together, i.e., adversarial noises crafted by one-step gradient methods are linearly separable if equipped with the corresponding labels. We theoretically prove this property for a two-layer network with randomly initialized entries and the neural tangent kernel setup where the parameters are not far from initialization. The proof idea is to show the label information can be efficiently backpropagated to the input while keeping the linear separability. Our theory and experimental evidence further show that the linear classifier trained with the adversarial noises of the training data can well classify the adversarial noises of the test data, indicating that adversarial noises actually inject a distributional perturbation to the original data distribution. Furthermore, we empirically demonstrate that the adversarial noises may become less linearly separable when the above conditions are compromised while they are still much easier to classify than original features. Huishuai Zhang, Yiping Lu 0001, Di He 0001 |
AISTATS | 3 |
| 2023 | Minimax Optimal Kernel Operator Learning via Multilevel Training
Jikai Jin, Yiping Lu 0001, Jose H. Blanchet, Lexing Ying |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2023 | When can Regression-Adjusted Control Variate Help? Rare Events, Sobolev Embedding and Minimax OptimalityabstractThis paper studies the use of a machine learning-based estimator as a control variate for mitigating the variance of Monte Carlo sampling. Specifically, we seek to uncover the key factors that influence the efficiency of control variates in reducing variance. We examine a prototype estimation problem that involves simulating the moments of a Sobolev function based on observations obtained from (random) quadrature nodes. Firstly, we establish an information-theoretic lower bound for the problem. We then study a specific quadrature rule that employs a nonparametric regression-adjusted control variate to reduce the variance of the Monte Carlo simulation. We demonstrate that this kind of quadrature rule can improve the Monte Carlo rate and achieve the minimax optimal rate under a sufficient smoothness assumption. Due to the Sobolev Embedding Theorem, the sufficient smoothness assumption eliminates the existence of rare and extreme events. Finally, we show that, in the presence of rare and extreme events, a truncated version of the Monte Carlo algorithm can achieve the minimax optimal rate while the control variate cannot improve the convergence rate. Jose H. Blanchet, Haoxuan Chen, Yiping Lu 0001, Lexing Ying |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2022 | Machine Learning For Elliptic PDEs: Fast Rate Generalization Bound, Neural Scaling Law and Minimax Optimality
Yiping Lu 0001, Haoxuan Chen, Jianfeng Lu 0001, Lexing Ying, Jose H. Blanchet |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2022 | An Unconstrained Layer-Peeled Perspective on Neural Collapse
Wenlong Ji, Yiping Lu 0001, Yiliang Zhang, Zhun Deng, Weijie J. Su |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2022 | Sobolev Acceleration and Statistical Optimality for Learning Elliptic Equations via Gradient DescentabstractIn this paper, we study the statistical limits in terms of Sobolev norms of gradient descent for solving inverse problem from randomly sampled noisy observations using a general class of objective functions. Our class of objective functions includes Sobolev training for kernel regression, Deep Ritz Methods (DRM), and Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINN) for solving elliptic partial differential equations (PDEs) as special cases. We consider a potentially infinite-dimensional parameterization of our model using a suitable Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space and a continuous parameterization of problem hardness through the definition of kernel integral operators. We prove that gradient descent over this objective function can also achieve statistical optimality and the optimal number of passes over the data increases with sample size. Based on our theory, we explain an implicit acceleration of using a Sobolev norm as the objective function for training, inferring that the optimal number of epochs of DRM becomes larger than the number of PINN when both the data size and the hardness of tasks increase, although both DRM and PINN can achieve statistical optimality. Yiping Lu 0001, Jose H. Blanchet, Lexing Ying |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | A Mean Field Analysis Of Deep ResNet And Beyond: Towards Provably Optimization Via Overparameterization From DepthabstractTraining deep neural networks with stochastic gradient descent (SGD) can often achieve zero training loss on real-world tasks although the optimization landscape is known to be highly non-convex. To understand the success of SGD for training deep neural networks, this work presents a mean-field analysis of deep residual networks, based on a line of works which interpret the continuum limit of the deep residual network as an ordinary differential equation as the the network capacity tends to infinity. Specifically, we propose a \textbf{new continuum limit} of deep residual networks, which enjoys a good landscape in the sense that \textbf{every local minimizer is global}. This characterization enables us to derive the first global convergence result for multilayer neural networks in the mean-field regime. Furthermore, our proof does not rely on the convexity of the loss landscape, but instead, an assumption on the global minimizer should achieve zero loss which can be achieved when the model shares a universal approximation property. Key to our result is the observation that a deep residual network resembles a shallow network ensemble \cite{veit2016residual}, \emph{i.e.} a two-layer network. We bound the difference between the shallow network and our ResNet model via the adjoint sensitivity method, which enables us to transfer previous mean-field analysis of two-layer networks to deep networks. Furthermore, we propose several novel training schemes based on our new continuous model, among which one new training procedure introduces the operation of switching the order of the residual blocks and results in strong empirical performance on benchmark datasets. Yiping Lu 0001, Chao Ma 0012, Yulong Lu, Jianfeng Lu 0001, Lexing Ying |
ICML | 1 |
| 2020 | CURE: Curvature Regularization for Missing Data RecoveryabstractMissing data recovery is an important and yet challenging problem in imaging and data science. Successful models often adopt certain carefully chosen regularization. Recently, the low dimensional manifold model (LDMM) was introduced by [S. Osher, Z. Shi, and W. Zhu, Low Dimensional Manifold Model for Image Processing, Technical report, cam report 16-04, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 2016] and shown to be effective in image inpainting. The authors of [ Low Dimensional Manifold Model for Image Processing, Technical report, cam report 16-04, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 2016] observed that enforcing low dimensionality on the image patch manifold serves as a good image regularizer. In this paper, we observe that having only the low dimensional manifold regularization is not enough sometimes, and we need smoothness as well. For that, we introduce a new regularization by combining the low dimensional manifold regularization with a higher order \bf CUrvature \bf REgularization, which we call new regularization CURE for short. The key step of CURE is to solve a biharmonic equation on a manifold. We further introduce a weighted version of CURE, called WeCURE, in a similar manner as the weighted nonlocal Laplacian (WNLL) method [Z. Shi, S. Osher, and W. Zhu, Weighted nonlocal Laplacian on interpolation from sparse data, J. Sci. Comput., 73 (2017), pp. 1164--1177]. Numerical experiments for image inpainting and semisupervised learning show that the proposed CURE and WeCURE significantly outperform LDMM and WNLL, respectively. Bin Dong 0001, Haocheng Ju, Yiping Lu 0001, Zuoqiang Shi |
SIAM J. Imaging Sci. | 3 |
| 2019 | Dynamically Unfolding Recurrent Restorer: A Moving Endpoint Control Method for Image Restoration
Xiaoshuai Zhang, Yiping Lu 0001, Jiaying Liu 0001, Bin Dong 0001 |
ICLR (Poster) | 2 |
| 2019 | You Only Propagate Once: Accelerating Adversarial Training via Maximal PrincipleabstractDeep learning achieves state-of-the-art results in many tasks in computer vision and natural language processing. However, recent works have shown that deep networks can be vulnerable to adversarial perturbations which raised a serious robustness issue of deep networks. Adversarial training, typically formulated as a robust optimization problem, is an effective way of improving the robustness of deep networks. A major drawback of existing adversarial training algorithms is the computational overhead of the generation of adversarial examples, typically far greater than that of the network training. This leads to unbearable overall computational cost of adversarial training. In this paper, we show that adversarial training can be cast as a discrete time differential game. Through analyzing the Pontryagin’s Maximum Principle (PMP) of the problem, we observe that the adversary update is only coupled with the parameters of the first layer of the network. This inspires us to restrict most of the forward and back propagation within the first layer of the network during adversary updates. This effectively reduces the total number of full forward and backward propagation to only one for each group of adversary updates. Therefore, we refer to this algorithm YOPO (\textbf{Y}ou \textbf{O}nly \textbf{P}ropagate \textbf{O}nce). Numerical experiments demonstrate that YOPO can achieve comparable defense accuracy with \textbf{approximately 1/5 $\sim$ 1/4 GPU time} of the projected gradient descent (PGD) algorithm~\cite{kurakin2016adversarial}. Dinghuai Zhang, Yiping Lu 0001, Zhanxing Zhu, Bin Dong 0001 |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2018 | PDE-Net: Learning PDEs from DataabstractPartial differential equations (PDEs) play a prominent role in many disciplines of science and engineering. PDEs are commonly derived based on empirical observations. However, with the rapid development of sensors, computational power, and data storage in the past decade, huge quantities of data can be easily collected and efficiently stored. Such vast quantity of data offers new opportunities for data-driven discovery of physical laws. Inspired by the latest development of neural network designs in deep learning, we propose a new feed-forward deep network, called PDE-Net, to fulfill two objectives at the same time: to accurately predict dynamics of complex systems and to uncover the underlying hidden PDE models. Comparing with existing approaches, our approach has the most flexibility by learning both differential operators and the nonlinear response function of the underlying PDE model. A special feature of the proposed PDE-Net is that all filters are properly constrained, which enables us to easily identify the governing PDE models while still maintaining the expressive and predictive power of the network. These constrains are carefully designed by fully exploiting the relation between the orders of differential operators and the orders of sum rules of filters (an important concept originated from wavelet theory). Numerical experiments show that the PDE-Net has the potential to uncover the hidden PDE of the observed dynamics, and predict the dynamical behavior for a relatively long time, even in a noisy environment. Zichao Long, Yiping Lu 0001, Xianzhong Ma, Bin Dong 0001 |
ICML | 2 |
| 2018 | Beyond Finite Layer Neural Networks: Bridging Deep Architectures and Numerical Differential EquationsabstractDeep neural networks have become the state-of-the-art models in numerous machine learning tasks. However, general guidance to network architecture design is still missing. In our work, we bridge deep neural network design with numerical differential equations. We show that many effective networks, such as ResNet, PolyNet, FractalNet and RevNet, can be interpreted as different numerical discretizations of differential equations. This finding brings us a brand new perspective on the design of effective deep architectures. We can take advantage of the rich knowledge in numerical analysis to guide us in designing new and potentially more effective deep networks. As an example, we propose a linear multi-step architecture (LM-architecture) which is inspired by the linear multi-step method solving ordinary differential equations. The LM-architecture is an effective structure that can be used on any ResNet-like networks. In particular, we demonstrate that LM-ResNet and LM-ResNeXt (i.e. the networks obtained by applying the LM-architecture on ResNet and ResNeXt respectively) can achieve noticeably higher accuracy than ResNet and ResNeXt on both CIFAR and ImageNet with comparable numbers of trainable parameters. In particular, on both CIFAR and ImageNet, LM-ResNet/LM-ResNeXt can significantly compress (>50%) the original networks while maintaining a similar performance. This can be explained mathematically using the concept of modified equation from numerical analysis. Last but not least, we also establish a connection between stochastic control and noise injection in the training process which helps to improve generalization of the networks. Furthermore, by relating stochastic training strategy with stochastic dynamic system, we can easily apply stochastic training to the networks with the LM-architecture. As an example, we introduced stochastic depth to LM-ResNet and achieve significant improvement over the original LM-ResNet on CIFAR10. Yiping Lu 0001, Aoxiao Zhong, Quanzheng Li, Bin Dong 0001 |
ICML | 1 |