Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vladimir I. Piterbarg

dblp:94/11072 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Physical-layer communications · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Physical-layer communications
fading channels
0.112012
Fourth-Order Spatial Correlation-Coefficient Across the Uplink Receiver's Spatial Aperture - Analytically Derived in Closed Form · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2012
Physical-layer communications › channel modeling
spatial correlation
0.112012
Fourth-Order Spatial Correlation-Coefficient Across the Uplink Receiver's Spatial Aperture - Analytically Derived in Closed Form · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2012
Physical-layer communications › channel modeling › propagation channel modeling
wireless channel modeling
0.112012
Fourth-Order Spatial Correlation-Coefficient Across the Uplink Receiver's Spatial Aperture - Analytically Derived in Closed Form · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2012
Physical-layer communications
antenna arrays
0.012012
Fourth-Order Spatial Correlation-Coefficient Across the Uplink Receiver's Spatial Aperture - Analytically Derived in Closed Form · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic geometry · 0.1poisson point process · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Fourth-Order Spatial Correlation-Coefficient Across the Uplink Receiver's Spatial Aperture - Analytically Derived in Closed Form
abstract
This paper is first in the open literature (to the authors' best knowledge) on wireless channel fading to derive the uplink received signal's fourth-order spatial-correlation coefficient function across a receiving sensor-array's aperture. This derivation is mathematically rigorous and is based on idealized geometric relationships among the mobile transmitter, the base-station's receiving antennas, and the scatterers of the channel. The scatterers' spatial locations are modeled as Poisson distributed, with a Gaussian intensity over a two-dimensional space. This scatterer model has previously been empirically verified to produce faithful expressions for the second-order spatial correlation coefficient. The final formula is in closed form, explicit in terms of the simple geometric model's few independent parameters.
Cheng-Siang Wang, Meihui Guo, Kainam Thomas Wong, Vladimir I. Piterbarg
IEEE Trans. Commun.4
2004 Analytically-derived explicit closed-form spatial-correlation function for the landmobile uplink with scatterers located stochastically as nonhomogeneous Poisson
abstract
This paper is first in the open literature of wireless landmobile radiowave cellular communication to derive via thorough mathematics explicit closed-form expressions for the uplink received-signal's spatial-correlation-coefficient function across the basestation antenna-array's aperture. This rigorous analytical derivation is based on geometric relationships among the mobile transmitter, the basestation's receiving antennas, and the scatterers. The derived spatial-correlation-coefficient functions are expressed explicitly in terms of the base-station's interantenna spacing and in terms of each scatterer-cluster's distance and spatial angle from the base-station. The scatterers' spatial distribution is herein modeled as stochastic, Poisson-distributed with multiGaussian intensity over a two-dimensional space. This nonhomogeneous stochastic spatial distribution accommodates better the field variability in the scatterers' spatial locations than would deterministic spatial distributions (like the uniform-ring, the uniform-disc, or the Gaussian spatial distributions) that currently dominate the literature.
Vladimir I. Piterbarg, Kainam Thomas Wong
ICC1