Abstract not provided

The new era of cognitive computing brings forth the grand challenge of developing systems capable of processing massive amounts of noisy multisensory data. This type of intelligent computing poses a set of constraints, including real-time operation, low-power consumption and scalability, which require a radical departure from conventional system design. Brain-inspired architectures offer tremendous promise in this area. To this end, we developed TrueNorth, a 65 mW real-time neurosynaptic processor that implements a non-von Neumann, low-power, highly-parallel, scalable, and defect-tolerant architecture. With 4096 neurosynaptic cores, the TrueNorth chip contains 1 million digital neurons and 256 million synapses tightly interconnected by an event-driven routing infrastructure. The fully digital 5.4 billion transistor implementation leverages existing CMOS scaling trends, while ensuring one-to-one correspondence between hardware and software. With such aggressive design metrics and the TrueNorth architecture breaking path with prevailing architectures, it is clear that conventional computer-aided design (CAD) tools could not be used for the design. As a result, we developed a novel design methodology that includes mixed asynchronous-synchronous circuits and a complete tool flow for building an event-driven, low-power neurosynaptic chip. The TrueNorth chip is fully configurable in terms of connectivity and neural parameters to allow custom configurations for a wide range of cognitive and sensory perception applications. To reduce the system's communication energy, we have adapted existing application-agnostic very large-scale integration CAD placement tools for mapping logical neural networks to the physical neurosynaptic core locations on the TrueNorth chips. With that, we have successfully demonstrated the use of TrueNorth-based systems in multiple applications, including visual object recognition, with higher performance and orders of magnitude lower power consumption than the same algorithms run on von Neumann architectures. The TrueNorth chip and its tool flow serve as building blocks for future cognitive systems, and give designers an opportunity to develop novel brain-inspired architectures and systems based on the knowledge obtained from this paper.

Drawing on neuroscience, we have developed a parallel, event-driven kernel for neurosynaptic computation, that is efficient with respect to computation, memory, and communication. Building on the previously demonstrated highly optimized software expression of the kernel, here, we demonstrate True North, a co-designed silicon expression of the kernel. True North achieves five orders of magnitude reduction in energy to-solution and two orders of magnitude speedup in time-to solution, when running computer vision applications and complex recurrent neural network simulations. Breaking path with the von Neumann architecture, True North is a 4,096 core, 1 million neuron, and 256 million synapse brain-inspired neurosynaptic processor, that consumes 65mW of power running at real-time and delivers performance of 46 Giga-Synaptic OPS/Watt. We demonstrate seamless tiling of True North chips into arrays, forming a foundation for cortex-like scalability. True North's unprecedented time-to-solution, energy-to-solution, size, scalability, and performance combined with the underlying flexibility of the kernel enable a broad range of cognitive applications.

Marching along the DARPA SyNAPSE roadmap, IBM unveils a trilogy of innovations towards the TrueNorth cognitive computing system inspired by the brain's function and efficiency. Judiciously balancing the dual objectives of functional capability and implementation/operational cost, we develop a simple, digital, reconfigurable, versatile spiking neuron model that supports one-to-one equivalence between hardware and simulation and is implementable using only 1272 ASIC gates. Starting with the classic leaky integrate-and-fire neuron, we add: (a) configurable and reproducible stochasticity to the input, the state, and the output; (b) four leak modes that bias the internal state dynamics; (c) deterministic and stochastic thresholds; and (d) six reset modes for rich finite-state behavior. The model supports a wide variety of computational functions and neural codes. We capture 50+ neuron behaviors in a library for hierarchical composition of complex computations and behaviors. Although designed with cognitive algorithms and applications in mind, serendipitously, the neuron model can qualitatively replicate the 20 biologically-relevant behaviors of a dynamical neuron model.

Sequential equivalence checking (SEC) technologies, capable of demonstrating the behavioral equivalence of two designs, have grown dramatically in capacity over the past decades. The ability to efficiently identify and leverage internal equivalence points to reduce the domain of the overall SEC problem is central to SEC scalability. However, conditionally equivalent designs - within which internal equivalence may not exist under sequential observability don't care conditions - are notoriously difficult for automated SEC tools. This paper constitutes one of the first attempts to advance the scalability of SEC for conditionally equivalent designs through automated invariant generation, which enables an inductive solution to an otherwise highly-noninductive problem. Through careful software engineering and various heuristics, this technique has been demonstrated capable of yielding orders of magnitude speedup on difficult industrial conditional SEC problems, in cases constituting the only method that we have found to achieve an automated solution.

We present a hardware verification environment that integrates the ACL2 theorem prover and SixthSense, an IBM internal formal verification tool. In this environment, SixthSense is invoked through an ACL2 function acl2six that makes use of a general-purpose external interface added to the ACL2 theorem prover. This interface allows decision procedures and model-checkers to be connected to ACL2 by simply writing ACL2 functions. Our environment also exploits a unique approach to connect the logic of a general-purpose theorem prover with machine designs in VHDL without a language embedding. With an example of a pipelined multiplier, we show how our environment can be used to divide a large verification problem into a number of simpler problems, which can be verified using automated verification engines