Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ying Wang 0051
dblp:94/3104-51
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-6866-2076ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 41% Segmentation and scene understanding · 28% Representation and self-supervised learning · 21% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Adversarial Dense Contrastive Learning for Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2023 InverseForm: A Loss Function for Structured Boundary-Aware Segmentation · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.9 | 2 | 2020 | Bayesian Bits: Unifying Quantization and Pruning · NeurIPS 2020 Differentiable Joint Pruning and Quantization for Hardware Efficiency · ECCV (29) 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning › robust contrastive learning
adversarial contrastive learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Adversarial Dense Contrastive Learning for Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Adversarial Dense Contrastive Learning for Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2023 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › annotation-efficient segmentation
semi-supervised semantic segmentation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Adversarial Dense Contrastive Learning for Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Bayesian Bits: Unifying Quantization and Pruning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › quantization
mixed-precision quantization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Bayesian Bits: Unifying Quantization and Pruning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Bayesian Bits: Unifying Quantization and Pruning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning and quantization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Differentiable Joint Pruning and Quantization for Hardware Efficiency · ECCV (29) 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
quantization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Bayesian Bits: Unifying Quantization and Pruning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Adversarial Dense Contrastive Learning for Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quantization · 0.9pruning · 0.9differentiable optimization · 0.9data augmentation · 0.7contrastive learning · 0.7adversarial training · 0.7loss function design · 0.5inverse-transformation network · 0.5variational inference · 0.4gradient-based optimization · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Adversarial Dense Contrastive Learning for Semi-Supervised Semantic SegmentationabstractSemi-supervised dense prediction tasks, such as semantic segmentation, can be greatly improved through the use of contrastive learning. However, this approach presents two key challenges: selecting informative negative samples from a highly redundant pool and implementing effective data augmentation. To address these challenges, we present an adversarial contrastive learning method specifically for semi-supervised semantic segmentation. Direct learning of adversarial negatives is adopted to retain discriminative information from the past, leading to higher learning efficiency. Our approach also leverages an advanced data augmentation strategy called AdverseMix, which combines information from under-performing classes to generate more diverse and challenging samples. Additionally, we use auxiliary labels and classifiers to prevent over-adversarial negatives from affecting the learning process. Our experiments on the Pascal VOC and Cityscapes datasets demonstrate that our method outperforms the state-of-the-art by a significant margin, even when using a small fraction of labeled data. Ying Wang 0051, Ziwei Xuan, Chiuman Ho, Guo-Jun Qi |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 1 |
| 2022 | Perceptual Consistency in Video SegmentationabstractIn this paper, we present a novel perceptual consistency perspective on video semantic segmentation, which can capture both temporal consistency and pixel-wise correctness. Given two nearby video frames, perceptual consistency measures how much the segmentation decisions agree with the pixel correspondences obtained via matching general perceptual features. More specifically, for each pixel in one frame, we find the most perceptually correlated pixel in the other frame. Our intuition is that such a pair of pixels are highly likely to belong to the same class. Next, we assess how much the segmentation agrees with such perceptual correspondences, based on which we derive the perceptual consistency of the segmentation maps across these two frames. Utilizing perceptual consistency, we can evaluate the temporal consistency of video segmentation by measuring the perceptual consistency over consecutive pairs of segmentation maps in a video. Furthermore, given a sparsely labeled test video, perceptual consistency can be utilized to aid with predicting the pixel-wise correctness of the segmentation on an unlabeled frame. More specifically, by measuring the perceptual consistency between the predicted segmentation and the available ground truth on a nearby frame and combining it with the segmentation confidence, we can accurately assess the classification correctness on each pixel. Our experiments show that the proposed perceptual consistency can more accurately evaluate the temporal consistency of video segmentation as compared to flow-based measures. Furthermore, it can help more confidently predict segmentation accuracy on unlabeled test frames, as compared to using classification confidence alone. Finally, our proposed measure can be used as a regularizer during the training of segmentation models, which leads to more temporally consistent video segmentation while maintaining accuracy. Yizhe Zhang 0001, Shubhankar Borse, Ying Wang 0051, Ning Bi, Xiaoyun Jiang, Fatih Porikli |
WACV | 4 |
| 2021 | InverseForm: A Loss Function for Structured Boundary-Aware SegmentationabstractWe present a novel boundary-aware loss term for semantic segmentation using an inverse-transformation network, which efficiently learns the degree of parametric transformations between estimated and target boundaries. This plug-in loss term complements the cross-entropy loss in capturing boundary transformations and allows consistent and significant performance improvement on segmentation backbone models without increasing their size and computational complexity. We analyze the quantitative and qualitative effects of our loss function on three indoor and outdoor segmentation benchmarks, including Cityscapes, NYU-Depth-v2, and PASCAL, integrating it into the training phase of several backbone networks in both single-task and multi-task settings. Our extensive experiments show that the proposed method consistently outperforms base-lines, and even sets the new state-of-the-art on two datasets. Shubhankar Borse, Ying Wang 0051, Yizhe Zhang 0001, Fatih Porikli |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2020 | Differentiable Joint Pruning and Quantization for Hardware Efficiency
Ying Wang 0051, Yadong Lu, Tijmen Blankevoort |
ECCV (29) | 1 |
| 2020 | Bayesian Bits: Unifying Quantization and PruningabstractWe introduce Bayesian Bits, a practical method for joint mixed precision quantization and pruning through gradient based optimization. Bayesian Bits employs a novel decomposition of the quantization operation, which sequentially considers doubling the bit width. At each new bit width, the residual error between the full precision value and the previously rounded value is quantized. We then decide whether or not to add this quantized residual error for a higher effective bit width and lower quantization noise. By starting with a power-of-two bit width, this decomposition will always produce hardware-friendly configurations, and through an additional 0-bit option, serves as a unified view of pruning and quantization. Bayesian Bits then introduces learnable stochastic gates, which collectively control the bit width of the given tensor. As a result, we can obtain low bit solutions by performing approximate inference over the gates, with prior distributions that encourage most of them to be switched off. We experimentally validate our proposed method on several benchmark datasets and show that we can learn pruned, mixed precision networks that provide a better trade-off between accuracy and efficiency than their static bit width equivalents. Mart van Baalen, Christos Louizos, Markus Nagel, Rana Ali Amjad, Ying Wang 0051, Tijmen Blankevoort, Max Welling |
NeurIPS | 5 |