Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vladislav Daniel Veksler

dblp:94/4255 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 5 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 7 · 5 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics
graph visualization
0.112006
TreePlus: Interactive Exploration of Networks with Enhanced Tree Layouts · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2006
Visualization and visual analytics › graph visualization
interactive graph exploration
0.112006
TreePlus: Interactive Exploration of Networks with Enhanced Tree Layouts · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2006
Visualization and visual analytics › graph visualization
node-link layout
0.112006
TreePlus: Interactive Exploration of Networks with Enhanced Tree Layouts · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2006
Visualization and visual analytics › hierarchical data visualization
tree layout
0.112006
TreePlus: Interactive Exploration of Networks with Enhanced Tree Layouts · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

controlled user study · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Automatic Model Generation with Symbolic Deep Learning
Vladislav Daniel Veksler, Norbou Buchler
CogSci1
2018 Humans aren't enough: Providing access for simulated participants to behavioral experiment software
Vladislav Daniel Veksler, Norbou Buchler, Christian Lebiere, Don Morrison
CogSci1
2016 Know Your Enemy: Applying Cognitive Modeling in Security Domain
Vladislav Daniel Veksler, Norbou Buchler
CogSci1
2014 Computational Cognition Ideation Challenge
Kevin A. Gluck, Vladislav Daniel Veksler, Norbou Buchler, Troy D. Kelley, Paul Bello, James J. Donlon, Alonso Vera, Bob Lee
CogSci2
2014 Controlling State-Space Explosion in Chunk Learning
Vladislav Daniel Veksler, Kevin A. Gluck, Christopher W. Myers, Jack Harris, Thomas Mielke
CogSci1
2013 Explorations in Human and Machine Learning of Decision Trees
Kevin A. Gluck, Jack Harris, Thomas Mielke, Christopher W. Myers, Vladislav Daniel Veksler
CogSci5
2012 An Integrated Model of Associative and Reinforcement Learning
Vladislav Daniel Veksler, Christopher W. Myers, Kevin A. Gluck
CogSci1
2006 TreePlus: Interactive Exploration of Networks with Enhanced Tree Layouts
abstract
Despite extensive research, it is still difficult to produce effective interactive layouts for large graphs. Dense layout and occlusion make food webs, ontologies, and social networks difficult to understand and interact with. We propose a new interactive Visual Analytics component called TreePlus that is based on a tree-style layout. TreePlus reveals the missing graph structure with visualization and interaction while maintaining good readability. To support exploration of the local structure of the graph and gathering of information from the extensive reading of labels, we use a guiding metaphor of "Plant a seed and watch it grow." It allows users to start with a node and expand the graph as needed, which complements the classic overview techniques that can be effective at (but often limited to) revealing clusters. We describe our design goals, describe the interface, and report on a controlled user study with 28 participants comparing TreePlus with a traditional graph interface for six tasks. In general, the advantage of TreePlus over the traditional interface increased as the density of the displayed data increased. Participants also reported higher levels of confidence in their answers with TreePlus and most of them preferred TreePlus.
Bongshin Lee, Cynthia Sims Parr, Catherine Plaisant, Benjamin B. Bederson, Vladislav Daniel Veksler, Wayne D. Gray, Christopher Kotfila
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.5