Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anne Rasse

dblp:94/5159 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1992
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program verification · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program verification
model checking
0.011992
A Toolbox for the Verification of LOTOS Programs · ICSE 1992
Program verification
protocol verification
0.011992
A Toolbox for the Verification of LOTOS Programs · ICSE 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

satisfiability checking · 0.0formal methods · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1992 A Toolbox for the Verification of LOTOS Programs
abstract
This paper presents the tools ALDEBARAN, CESAR, CESAR.ADT and CLEOPATRE which constitute a tool- box for compiling and verifying LOTOS programs. The principles of these tools are described, as well as their performances and limitations. Finally, the formal verification of the ret/REL atomic multicast protocol is given as an example to illustrate the practical use of the tool- box.
Jean-Claude Fernandez, Hubert Garavel, Laurent Mounier, Anne Rasse, Joseph Sifakis
ICSE4