Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eva Noll

dblp:94/6934 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
path planning
0.011996
An explicit path planner to facilitate reactive control and terrain preferences · ICRA 1996
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
reactive control
0.011996
An explicit path planner to facilitate reactive control and terrain preferences · ICRA 1996
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › path planning › mobile robot path planning
terrain-aware path planning
0.011996
An explicit path planner to facilitate reactive control and terrain preferences · ICRA 1996

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wavefront propagation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1996 An explicit path planner to facilitate reactive control and terrain preferences
abstract
This paper presents a new approach to reactive control utilizing the output of an explicit path planner which considers terrain preferences. To demonstrate the concept, a wavefront propagation, type of planner algorithm, Trulla, is integrated into a reactive framework and used as part of the overall architecture. Terrain preferences are represented as weights or costs which are considered in generating a near optimal path. The algorithm is demonstrated on the CSM Denning-Branch MRV4 mobile robot for three scenarios: navigation out of a box canyon, planning with terrain preferences, and opportunistic path improvement.
Robin R. Murphy, Ken Hughes, Eva Noll
ICRA3