Robert Finis Anderson

dblp:94/8203 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 50% Image and video processing · 50%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
image analysis
0.112011
A Dual-Bound Algorithm for Very Fast and Exact Template Matching · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2011
Image and video processing › image matching
template matching
0.112011
A Dual-Bound Algorithm for Very Fast and Exact Template Matching · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2011
Information retrieval › image retrieval
content-based image retrieval
0.112009
A near optimal acceptance-rejection algorithm for exact cross-correlation search · ICCV 2009
Information retrieval
image retrieval
0.112009
A near optimal acceptance-rejection algorithm for exact cross-correlation search · ICCV 2009
Information retrieval › pattern matching
template matching
0.112009
A near optimal acceptance-rejection algorithm for exact cross-correlation search · ICCV 2009
Algorithms and data structures
search algorithms
0.012009
A near optimal acceptance-rejection algorithm for exact cross-correlation search · ICCV 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

normalized correlation bounds · 0.2acceptance-rejection pruning · 0.2lower and upper bounds · 0.1dual-bound algorithm · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 A Dual-Bound Algorithm for Very Fast and Exact Template Matching
abstract
Recently proposed fast template matching techniques employ rejection schemes derived from lower bounds on the match measure. This paper generalizes that idea and shows that in addition to lower bounds, upper bounds on the match measure can be used to accelerate the search. An algorithm is proposed that utilizes both lower and upper bounds to detect the k best matches in an image. The performance of this dual-bound algorithm is guaranteed; it always detects the k best matches. Theoretical analysis and experimental results show that its runtime compares favorably with previously proposed real-time exact template-matching schemes.
Haim Schweitzer, Rui A. Deng, Robert Finis Anderson
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.3
2009 A near optimal acceptance-rejection algorithm for exact cross-correlation search
abstract
We describe a fast algorithm that searches for the k most likely locations of a template in an image according to the standard normalized correlations criterion. The algorithm is exact; it always finds the best matches. Its speed is achieved by utilizing an acceptance-rejection pruning scheme, applied to easily computed bounds on the normalized correlation values. Previously proposed rejection schemes require a rejection threshold that has to be provided or estimated from the data. Our algorithm does not use such thresholds explicitly, but performs as well as if the perfect rejection threshold is known.
Haim Schweitzer, Robert Finis Anderson, Rui A. Deng
ICCV2
2009 Fixed Time Template Matching
abstract
The problem of finding a match for an image (`template') within a larger image is known as template matching. It is key to a variety of computer vision applications. Currently known template matching algorithms run in fixed time, or are guaranteed to find the best match. We present a novel algorithm which in many cases can guarantee that the best match is found. In other cases it finds a good approximation to the best match. This algorithm runs in fixed time (a.k.a. hard real time). It finds an optimal match very quickly when a good match exists.
Robert Finis Anderson, Haim Schweitzer
SMC1