Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Howard J. Edenberg

dblp:95/107 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0003-0344-9690ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular property prediction
binding affinity change
0.112012
regSNPs: a strategy for prioritizing regulatory single nucleotide substitutions · Bioinform. 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

luciferase reporter assay · 0.1binding motif analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Characterizing the roles of long non-coding RNA in rat alcohol preference
abstract
Alcohol is one of the major threats to health in United States. With the emerging of next-generation sequencing technology, the association between alcohol preference and the variants and expression of genes has been investigated. However, the roles of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA) in alcohol preference remains unclear. In this study, we identified 37 novel lncRNAs that differentially expressed across alcohol preferring (P) and non-preferring (NP) rats. The functional study on these lncRNAs demonstrates that they are associated with gene regulation, as well as neural functions. This suggests that these lncRNAs may contribute to the alcohol preference behaviors.
Ao Zhou 0004, Weixing Feng, Howard J. Edenberg
BIBM5
2012 regSNPs: a strategy for prioritizing regulatory single nucleotide substitutions
abstract
MOTIVATION: One of the fundamental questions in genetics study is to identify functional DNA variants that are responsible to a disease or phenotype of interest. Results from large-scale genetics studies, such as genome-wide association studies (GWAS), and the availability of high-throughput sequencing technologies provide opportunities in identifying causal variants. Despite the technical advances, informatics methodologies need to be developed to prioritize thousands of variants for potential causative effects. RESULTS: We present regSNPs, an informatics strategy that integrates several established bioinformatics tools, for prioritizing regulatory SNPs, i.e. the SNPs in the promoter regions that potentially affect phenotype through changing transcription of downstream genes. Comparing to existing tools, regSNPs has two distinct features. It considers degenerative features of binding motifs by calculating the differences on the binding affinity caused by the candidate variants and integrates potential phenotypic effects of various transcription factors. When tested by using the disease-causing variants documented in the Human Gene Mutation Database, regSNPs showed mixed performance on various diseases. regSNPs predicted three SNPs that can potentially affect bone density in a region detected in an earlier linkage study. Potential effects of one of the variants were validated using luciferase reporter assay.
Mingxiang Teng, Shoji Ichikawa, Leah R. Padgett, Yadong Wang 0001, Matthew E. Mort, David N. Cooper, Daniel L. Koller, Tatiana Foroud, Howard J. Edenberg, Michael J. Econs
Bioinform.9
2006 Effects of filtering by Present call on analysis of microarray experiments
abstract
BACKGROUND: Affymetrix GeneChips are widely used for expression profiling of tens of thousands of genes. The large number of comparisons can lead to false positives. Various methods have been used to reduce false positives, but they have rarely been compared or quantitatively evaluated. Here we describe and evaluate a simple method that uses the detection (Present/Absent) call generated by the Affymetrix microarray suite version 5 software (MAS5) to remove data that is not reliably detected before further analysis, and compare this with filtering by expression level. We explore the effects of various thresholds for removing data in experiments of different size (from 3 to 10 arrays per treatment), as well as their relative power to detect significant differences in expression. RESULTS: Our approach sets a threshold for the fraction of arrays called Present in at least one treatment group. This method removes a large percentage of probe sets called Absent before carrying out the comparisons, while retaining most of the probe sets called Present. It preferentially retains the more significant probe sets (p < or = 0.001) and those probe sets that are turned on or off, and improves the false discovery rate. Permutations to estimate false positives indicate that probe sets removed by the filter contribute a disproportionate number of false positives. Filtering by fraction Present is effective when applied to data generated either by the MAS5 algorithm or by other probe-level algorithms, for example RMA (robust multichip average). Experiment size greatly affects the ability to reproducibly detect significant differences, and also impacts the effect of filtering; smaller experiments (3-5 samples per treatment group) benefit from more restrictive filtering (> or =50% Present). CONCLUSION: Use of a threshold fraction of Present detection calls (derived by MAS5) provided a simple method that effectively eliminated from analysis probe sets that are unlikely to be reliable while preserving the most significant probe sets and those turned on or off; it thereby increased the ratio of true positives to false positives.
Jeanette N. McClintick, Howard J. Edenberg
BMC Bioinform.2