Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stephen Soderland
dblp:95/3490
· DBLP profile ↗
33ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 29 · 6 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 7 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
17 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 67% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 16% Machine translation · 7% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers |
Information retrieval · 97% Web and social media mining · 3% |
Topics — the 26 heaviest of 29, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
open information extraction |
0.5 | 4 | 2012 | Open Language Learning for Information Extraction · EMNLP-CoNLL 2012 Open Information Extraction: The Second Generation · IJCAI 2011 Identifying Relations for Open Information Extraction · EMNLP 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction |
0.3 | 2 | 2014 | Type-Aware Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction with Linked Arguments · EMNLP 2014 Identifying Relations for Open Information Extraction · EMNLP 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction
distant supervision |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Type-Aware Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction with Linked Arguments · EMNLP 2014 |
Information retrieval › text summarization › structured summarization
hierarchical summarization |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Hierarchical Summarization: Scaling Up Multi-Document Summarization · ACL (1) 2014 |
Information retrieval › text summarization
multi-document summarization |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Hierarchical Summarization: Scaling Up Multi-Document Summarization · ACL (1) 2014 |
Information retrieval
text summarization |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Hierarchical Summarization: Scaling Up Multi-Document Summarization · ACL (1) 2014 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › event analysis › event understanding
event schema induction |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Generating Coherent Event Schemas at Scale · EMNLP 2013 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction
joint entity and relation extraction |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Generating Coherent Event Schemas at Scale · EMNLP 2013 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
probabilistic inference |
0.1 | 2 | 2010 | Compiling a Massive, Multilingual Dictionary via Probabilistic Inference · ACL/IJCNLP 2009 Panlingual lexical translation via probabilistic inference · Artif. Intell. 2010 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › commonsense reasoning
commonsense knowledge |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Open Information Extraction: The Second Generation · IJCAI 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › knowledge-intensive question answering
knowledge-based question answering |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Open Information Extraction: The Second Generation · IJCAI 2011 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition › knowledge extraction
unsupervised information extraction |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Analysis of a probabilistic model of redundancy in unsupervised information extraction · Artif. Intell. 2010 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
bilingual lexicon induction |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Compiling a Massive, Multilingual Dictionary via Probabilistic Inference · ACL/IJCNLP 2009 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › textual entailment
contradiction detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | It's a Contradiction - no, it's not: A Case Study using Functional Relations · EMNLP 2008 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
web information extraction |
0.1 | 2 | 2004 | Methods for Domain-Independent Information Extraction from the Web: An Experimental Comparison · AAAI 2004 Learning to Extract Text-Based Information from the World Wide Web · KDD 1997 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
named entity recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Unsupervised named-entity extraction from the Web: An experimental study · Artif. Intell. 2005 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
confidence estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Web-scale information extraction in knowitall: (preliminary results) · WWW 2004 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition › knowledge extraction
fact extraction |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Web-scale information extraction in knowitall: (preliminary results) · WWW 2004 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › knowledge discovery from text
knowledge base population |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Web-scale information extraction in knowitall: (preliminary results) · WWW 2004 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › web information extraction
web-scale information extraction |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Web-scale information extraction in knowitall: (preliminary results) · WWW 2004 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
knowledge base construction |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Identifying Relations for Open Information Extraction · EMNLP 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › document analysis
text extraction |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Learning to Extract Text-Based Information from the World Wide Web · KDD 1997 |
Web and social media mining
web mining |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Unsupervised named-entity extraction from the Web: An experimental study · Artif. Intell. 2005 |
Information retrieval › query processing
web query processing |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Web-scale information extraction in knowitall: (preliminary results) · WWW 2004 |
Computational social science and digital humanities › text analysis
discourse analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Corpus-Driven Knowledge Acquisition for Discourse Analysis · AAAI 1994 |
Information retrieval
web search |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Learning to Extract Text-Based Information from the World Wide Web · KDD 1997 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probabilistic inference · 0.3unsupervised learning · 0.2type constraints · 0.2salience coverage · 0.2distant supervision · 0.2coherence optimization · 0.2relational n-grams · 0.2co-occurrence statistics · 0.2open language learning · 0.1syntactic patterns · 0.1rule-based extraction · 0.1probabilistic modeling · 0.1web crawling · 0.0probabilistic reasoning · 0.0corpus analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Effective Crowd Annotation for Relation ExtractionabstractAngli Liu, Stephen Soderland, Jonathan Bragg, Christopher H. Lin, Xiao Ling, Daniel S. Weld. Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2016. Angli Liu, Stephen Soderland, Jonathan Bragg, Christopher H. Lin, Daniel S. Weld |
HLT-NAACL | 2 |
| 2015 | Exploiting Parallel News Streams for Unsupervised Event ExtractionabstractMost approaches to relation extraction, the task of extracting ground facts from natural language text, are based on machine learning and thus starved by scarce training data. Manual annotation is too expensive to scale to a comprehensive set of relations. Distant supervision, which automatically creates training data, only works with relations that already populate a knowledge base (KB). Unfortunately, KBs such as FreeBase rarely cover event relations ( e.g. “person travels to location”). Thus, the problem of extracting a wide range of events — e.g., from news streams — is an important, open challenge. This paper introduces NewsSpike-RE, a novel, unsupervised algorithm that discovers event relations and then learns to extract them. NewsSpike-RE uses a novel probabilistic graphical model to cluster sentences describing similar events from parallel news streams. These clusters then comprise training data for the extractor. Our evaluation shows that NewsSpike-RE generates high quality training sentences and learns extractors that perform much better than rival approaches, more than doubling the area under a precision-recall curve compared to Universal Schemas. Congle Zhang, Stephen Soderland, Daniel S. Weld |
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics | 2 |
| 2014 | Hierarchical Summarization: Scaling Up Multi-Document SummarizationabstractMulti-document summarization (MDS) systems have been designed for short, un-structured summaries of 10-15 documents, and are inadequate for larger document collections. We propose a new approach to scaling up summarization called hierar-chical summarization, and present the first implemented system, SUMMA. SUMMA produces a hierarchy of relatively short summaries, in which the top level provides a general overview and users can navigate the hierarchy to drill down for more details on topics of interest. SUMMA optimizes for coherence as well as cover-age of salient information. In an Amazon Mechanical Turk evaluation, users pref-ered SUMMA ten times as often as flat MDS and three times as often as timelines. 1 Janara Christensen, Stephen Soderland, Gagan Bansal, Mausam |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2014 | Type-Aware Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction with Linked ArgumentsabstractDistant supervision has become the lead-ing method for training large-scale rela-tion extractors, with nearly universal adop-tion in recent TAC knowledge-base pop-ulation competitions. However, there are still many questions about the best way to learn such extractors. In this paper we investigate four orthogonal improvements: integrating named entity linking (NEL) and coreference resolution into argument identification for training and extraction, enforcing type constraints of linked argu-ments, and partitioning the model by rela-tion type signature. We evaluate sentential extraction perfor-mance on two datasets: the popular set of NY Times articles partially annotated by Hoffmann et al. (2011) and a new dataset, called GORECO, that is comprehensively annotated for 48 common relations. We find that using NEL for argument identi-fication boosts performance over the tra-ditional approach (named entity recogni-tion with string match), and there is further improvement from using argument types. Our best system boosts precision by 44% and recall by 70%. 1 Mitchell Koch, John Gilmer, Stephen Soderland, Daniel S. Weld |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2013 | Generating Coherent Event Schemas at ScaleabstractChambers and Jurafsky (2009) demonstrated that event schemas can be automatically induced from text corpora.However, our analysis of their schemas identifies several weaknesses, e.g., some schemas lack a common topic and distinct roles are incorrectly mixed into a single actor.It is due in part to their pair-wise representation that treats subjectverb independently from verb-object.This often leads to subject-verb-object triples that are not meaningful in the real-world.We present a novel approach to inducing open-domain event schemas that overcomes these limitations.Our approach uses cooccurrence statistics of semantically typed relational triples, which we call Rel-grams (relational n-grams).In a human evaluation, our schemas outperform Chambers's schemas by wide margins on several evaluation criteria.Both Rel-grams and event schemas are freely available to the research community. Niranjan Balasubramanian, Stephen Soderland, Mausam, Oren Etzioni |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2013 | Towards Coherent Multi-Document Summarization
Janara Christensen, Mausam, Stephen Soderland, Oren Etzioni |
HLT-NAACL | 3 |
| 2012 | Open Language Learning for Information Extraction
Mausam, Michael Schmitz 0002, Stephen Soderland, Robert Bart, Oren Etzioni |
EMNLP-CoNLL | 3 |
| 2011 | Identifying Relations for Open Information Extraction
Anthony Fader, Stephen Soderland, Oren Etzioni |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2011 | Open Information Extraction: The Second GenerationabstractHow do we scale information extraction to the massive size and unprecedented heterogeneity of the Web corpus? Beginning in 2003, our KnowItAll project has sought to extract high-quality knowledge from the Web. In 2007, we introduced the Open Information Extraction (Open IE) paradigm which eschews handlabeled training examples, and avoids domainspecific verbs and nouns, to develop unlexicalized, domain-independent extractors that scale to the Web corpus. Open IE systems have extracted billions of assertions as the basis for both commonsense knowledge and novel question-answering systems. This paper describes the second generation of Open IE systems, which rely on a novel model of how relations and their arguments are expressed in English sentences to double precision/recall compared with previous systems such as TEXTRUNNER and WOE. 1 Oren Etzioni, Anthony Fader, Janara Christensen, Stephen Soderland, Mausam |
IJCAI | 4 |
| 2011 | An analysis of open information extraction based on semantic role labelingabstractOpen Information Extraction extracts relations from text without requiring a pre-specified domain or vocabulary. While existing techniques have used only shallow syntactic features, we investigate the use of semantic role labeling techniques for the task of Open IE. Semantic role labeling (SRL) and Open IE, although developed mostly in isolation, are quite related. We compare SRL-based open extractors, which perform computationally expensive, deep syntactic analysis, with TextRunner, an open extractor, which uses shallow syntactic analysis but is able to analyze many more sentences in a fixed amount of time and thus exploit corpus-level statistics. Our evaluation answers questions regarding these systems, including, can SRL extractors, which are trained on PropBank, cope with heterogeneous text found on the Web? Which extractor attains better precision, recall, f-measure, or running time? How does extractor performance vary for binary, n-ary and nested relations? How much do we gain by running multiple extractors? How do we select the optimal extractor given amount of data, available time, types of extractions desired? Janara Christensen, Mausam, Stephen Soderland, Oren Etzioni |
K-CAP | 3 |
| 2010 | Panlingual Lexical Translation via Probabilistic InferenceabstractThe bare minimum lexical resource required to translate between a pair of languages is a translation dictionary. Unfortunately, dictionaries exist only between a tiny fraction of the 49 million possible language-pairs making machine translation virtually impossible between most of the languages. This paper summarizes the last four years of our research motivated by the vision of panlingual communication. Our research comprises three key steps. First, we compile over 630 freely available dictionaries over the Web and convert this data into a single representation – the translation graph. Second, we build several inference algorithms that infer translations between word pairs even when no dictionary lists them as translations. Finally, we run our inference procedure offline to construct PANDICTIONARY– a sense-distinguished, massively multilingual dictionary that has translations in more than 1000 languages. Our experiments assess the quality of this dictionary and find that we have 4 times as many translations at a high precision of 0.9 compared to the English Wiktionary, which is the lexical resource closest to PANDICTIONARY. Mausam, Stephen Soderland, Oren Etzioni |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2010 | Analysis of a probabilistic model of redundancy in unsupervised information extraction
Doug Downey, Oren Etzioni, Stephen Soderland |
Artif. Intell. | 3 |
| 2010 | Panlingual lexical translation via probabilistic inference
Mausam, Stephen Soderland, Oren Etzioni, Daniel S. Weld, Kobi Reiter, Michael Skinner, Marcus Sammer, Jeff A. Bilmes |
Artif. Intell. | 2 |
| 2009 | Compiling a Massive, Multilingual Dictionary via Probabilistic Inference
Mausam, Stephen Soderland, Oren Etzioni, Daniel S. Weld, Michael Skinner, Jeff A. Bilmes |
ACL/IJCNLP | 2 |
| 2009 | Lemmatic Machine Translation
Stephen Soderland, Christopher Lim, Mausam, Oren Etzioni, Jonathan Pool |
MTSummit | 1 |
| 2008 | It's a Contradiction - no, it's not: A Case Study using Functional Relations
Alan Ritter, Stephen Soderland, Doug Downey, Oren Etzioni |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2007 | Open Information Extraction from the Web
Michele Banko, Michael J. Cafarella, Stephen Soderland, Matthew Broadhead, Oren Etzioni |
IJCAI | 3 |
| 2007 | Lexical translation with application to image searching on the web
Oren Etzioni, Kobi Reiter, Stephen Soderland, Marcus Sammer |
MTSummit | 3 |
| 2007 | Building a sense-distinguished multilingual lexicon from monolingual corpora and bilingual lexicons
Marcus Sammer, Stephen Soderland |
MTSummit | 2 |
| 2006 | Self-supervised Relation Extraction from the Web
Ronen Feldman, Binyamin Rosenfeld, Stephen Soderland, Oren Etzioni |
ISMIS | 3 |
| 2005 | A Probabilistic Model of Redundancy in Information Extraction
Doug Downey, Oren Etzioni, Stephen Soderland |
IJCAI | 3 |
| 2005 | Unsupervised named-entity extraction from the Web: An experimental study
Oren Etzioni, Michael J. Cafarella, Doug Downey, Ana-Maria Popescu, Tal Shaked, Stephen Soderland, Daniel S. Weld, Alexander Yates |
Artif. Intell. | 6 |
| 2004 | Methods for Domain-Independent Information Extraction from the Web: An Experimental Comparison
Oren Etzioni, Michael J. Cafarella, Doug Downey, Ana-Maria Popescu, Tal Shaked, Stephen Soderland, Daniel S. Weld, Alexander Yates |
AAAI | 6 |
| 2004 | Web-scale information extraction in knowitall: (preliminary results)abstractManually querying search engines in order to accumulate a large bodyof factual information is a tedious, error-prone process of piecemealsearch. Search engines retrieve and rank potentially relevantdocuments for human perusal, but do not extract facts, assessconfidence, or fuse information from multiple documents. This paperintroduces KnowItAll, a system that aims to automate the tedious process ofextracting large collections of facts from the web in an autonomous,domain-independent, and scalable manner.The paper describes preliminary experiments in which an instance of KnowItAll, running for four days on a single machine, was able to automatically extract 54,753 facts. KnowItAll associates a probability with each fact enabling it to trade off precision and recall. The paper analyzes KnowItAll's architecture and reports on lessons learned for the design of large-scale information extraction systems. Oren Etzioni, Michael J. Cafarella, Doug Downey, Stanley Kok, Ana-Maria Popescu, Tal Shaked, Stephen Soderland, Daniel S. Weld, Alexander Yates |
WWW | 7 |
| 2002 | Modeling a Concept-based Information System to Promote Scientific Discovery: The Telemakus System
Sherrilynne S. Fuller, Debra Revere, Stephen Soderland, Paul F. Bugni, Yana Kadiyska, Lucas Reber, Heather Fuller, George M. Martin |
AMIA | 3 |
| 2000 | Requirements of a Web-based experiment management system
Rex M. Jakobovits, Stephen Soderland, Ricky K. Taira, James F. Brinkley |
AMIA | 2 |
| 1999 | A statistical natural language processor for medical reports
Ricky K. Taira, Stephen Soderland |
AMIA | 2 |
| 1999 | Learning Information Extraction Rules for Semi-Structured and Free Text
Stephen Soderland |
Mach. Learn. | 1 |
| 1997 | Learning to Extract Text-Based Information from the World Wide Web
Stephen Soderland |
KDD | 1 |
| 1995 | CRYSTAL: Inducing a Conceptual Dictionary
Stephen Soderland, David Fisher, Jonathan Aseltine, Wendy G. Lehnert |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 1995 | Inductive text classification for medical applicationsabstractText classification poses a significant challenge for knowledge-based technologies because it touches on all the familiar demons of artificial intelligence: the knowledge engineering bottleneck, problems of scale, easy portability across multiple applications, and cost-effective system construction. Information retrieval (IR) technologies traditionally avoid all of these issues by defining a document in terms of a statistical profile of its lexical items. The IR community is willing to exploit a superficial type of knowledge found in dictionaries and thesaurae, but anything that requires customization, application-specific engineering, or any amount of manual tinkering is thought to be incompatible with practical cost-effective system designs. In this paper those assumptions are challenged and it is shown how machine learning techniques can operate as an effective method for automated knowledge acquisition when it is applied to a representative training corpus, and leveraged against a few hours of routine work by a domain expert. A fully implemented text classification system operating on a medical testbed is described and experimental results based on that testbed are reported. Wendy G. Lehnert, Stephen Soderland, David Aronow, Fangfang Feng, Avinoam Shmueli |
J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. | 2 |
| 1994 | Corpus-Driven Knowledge Acquisition for Discourse Analysis
Stephen Soderland, Wendy G. Lehnert |
AAAI | 1 |
| 1994 | Wrap-Up: a Trainable Discourse Module for Information ExtractionabstractThe vast amounts of on-line text now available have ledto renewed interest in information extraction (IE) systems thatanalyze unrestricted text, producing a structured representation ofselected information from the text. This paper presents a novel approachthat uses machine learning to acquire knowledge for some of the higher level IE processing. Wrap-Up is a trainable IE discourse component that makes intersentential inferences and identifies logicalrelations among information extracted from the text. Previous corpus-based approaches were limited to lower level processing such as part-of-speech tagging, lexical disambiguation, and dictionary construction. Wrap-Up is fully trainable, and not onlyautomatically decides what classifiers are needed, but even derives the featureset for each classifier automatically. Performance equals that of a partially trainable discourse module requiring manual customization for each domain. Stephen Soderland, Wendy G. Lehnert |
J. Artif. Intell. Res. | 1 |