Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arthur Flexer
dblp:95/4897
· DBLP profile ↗
28ranked-venue papers
13as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-1691-737XORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 20 · 12 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 8 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence comparison
alignment-free sequence analysis |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | DeepNOG: fast and accurate protein orthologous group assignment · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein function prediction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | DeepNOG: fast and accurate protein orthologous group assignment · Bioinform. 2021 |
Algorithms and data structures
similarity search |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Local and global scaling reduce hubs in space · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2012 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Limitations of Self-organizing Maps for Vector Quantization and Multidimensional Scaling · NIPS 1996 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
multidimensional scaling |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Limitations of Self-organizing Maps for Vector Quantization and Multidimensional Scaling · NIPS 1996 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › prototype learning
self-organizing map |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Limitations of Self-organizing Maps for Vector Quantization and Multidimensional Scaling · NIPS 1996 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sequence alignment · 0.5profile hidden markov model · 0.5deep convolutional neural network · 0.5vector quantization · 0.0self-organizing map · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Constructing adversarial examples to investigate the plausibility of explanations in deep audio and image classifiersabstractAbstract Given the rise of deep learning and its inherent black-box nature, the desire to interpret these systems and explain their behaviour became increasingly more prominent. The main idea of so-called explainers is to identify which features of particular samples have the most influence on a classifier’s prediction, and present them as explanations. Evaluating explainers, however, is difficult, due to reasons such as a lack of ground truth. In this work, we construct adversarial examples to check the plausibility of explanations, perturbing input deliberately to change a classifier’s prediction. This allows us to investigate whether explainers are able to detect these perturbed regions as the parts of an input that strongly influence a particular classification. Our results from the audio and image domain suggest that the investigated explainers often fail to identify the input regions most relevant for a prediction; hence, it remains questionable whether explanations are useful or potentially misleading. Katharina Hoedt, Verena Praher, Arthur Flexer, Gerhard Widmer |
Neural Comput. Appl. | 3 |
| 2021 | Computational Filling of Curatorial Gaps in a Fine Arts Exhibition
Arthur Flexer |
ICCC | 1 |
| 2021 | DeepNOG: fast and accurate protein orthologous group assignmentabstractMOTIVATION: Protein orthologous group databases are powerful tools for evolutionary analysis, functional annotation or metabolic pathway modeling across lineages. Sequences are typically assigned to orthologous groups with alignment-based methods, such as profile hidden Markov models, which have become a computational bottleneck. RESULTS: We present DeepNOG, an extremely fast and accurate, alignment-free orthology assignment method based on deep convolutional networks. We compare DeepNOG against state-of-the-art alignment-based (HMMER, DIAMOND) and alignment-free methods (DeepFam) on two orthology databases (COG, eggNOG 5). DeepNOG can be scaled to large orthology databases like eggNOG, for which it outperforms DeepFam in terms of precision and recall by large margins. While alignment-based methods still provide the most accurate assignments among the investigated methods, computing time of DeepNOG is an order of magnitude lower on CPUs. Optional GPU usage further increases throughput massively. A command-line tool enables rapid adoption by users. AVAILABILITYAND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code and packages are freely available at https://github.com/univieCUBE/deepnog. Install the platform-independent Python program with $pip install deepnog. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Roman Feldbauer, Lukas Gosch, Lukas Lüftinger, Patrick Hyden, Arthur Flexer, Thomas Rattei |
Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2020 | Basic filters for convolutional neural networks applied to music: Training or design?
Monika Dörfler, Thomas Grill, Roswitha Bammer, Arthur Flexer |
Neural Comput. Appl. | 4 |
| 2019 | A comprehensive empirical comparison of hubness reduction in high-dimensional spacesabstract, which are rarely or never nearest neighbors to other objects. Many machine learning algorithms rely on nearest neighbor search and some form of measuring distances, which are both impaired by high hubness. Degraded performance due to hubness has been reported for various tasks such as classification, clustering, regression, visualization, recommendation, retrieval and outlier detection. Several hubness reduction methods based on different paradigms have previously been developed. Local and global scaling as well as shared neighbors approaches aim at repairing asymmetric neighborhood relations. Global and localized centering try to eliminate spatial centrality, while the related global and local dissimilarity measures are based on density gradient flattening. Additional methods and alternative dissimilarity measures that were argued to mitigate detrimental effects of distance concentration also influence the related hubness phenomenon. In this paper, we present a large-scale empirical evaluation of all available unsupervised hubness reduction methods and dissimilarity measures. We investigate several aspects of hubness reduction as well as its influence on data semantics which we measure via nearest neighbor classification. Scaling and density gradient flattening methods improve evaluation measures such as hubness and classification accuracy consistently for data sets from a wide range of domains, while centering approaches achieve the same only under specific settings. Roman Feldbauer, Arthur Flexer |
Knowl. Inf. Syst. | 2 |
| 2016 | Centering Versus Scaling for Hubness Reduction
Roman Feldbauer, Arthur Flexer |
ICANN (1) | 2 |
| 2015 | The unbalancing effect of hubs on K-medoids clustering in high-dimensional spacesabstractUnbalanced cluster solutions are affected by very different cluster sizes, with some clusters being very large while others contain almost no data. We demonstrate that this phenomenon is connected to `hubness', a recently discovered general problem of machine learning in high dimensional data spaces. Hub objects have a small distance to an exceptionally large number of data points, and anti-hubs are far from all other data points. In an empirical study of K-medoids clustering we show that hubness gives rise to very unbalanced cluster sizes resulting in impaired internal and external evaluation indices. We compare three methods which reduce hubness in the distance spaces and show that with the balancing of the clusters evaluation indices improve. This is done using artificial and real data sets from diverse domains. Dominik Schnitzer, Arthur Flexer |
IJCNN | 2 |
| 2015 | Choosing ℓp norms in high-dimensional spaces based on hub analysisabstractThe hubness phenomenon is a recently discovered aspect of the curse of dimensionality. Hub objects have a small distance to an exceptionally large number of data points while anti-hubs lie far from all other data points. A closely related problem is the concentration of distances in high-dimensional spaces. Previous work has already advocated the use of fractional ℓ p norms instead of the ubiquitous Euclidean norm to avoid the negative effects of distance concentration. However, which exact fractional norm to use is a largely unsolved problem . The contribution of this work is an empirical analysis of the relation of different ℓ p norms and hubness. We propose an unsupervised approach for choosing an ℓ p norm which minimizes hubs while simultaneously maximizing nearest neighbor classification . Our approach is evaluated on seven high-dimensional data sets and compared to three approaches that re-scale distances to avoid hubness. Arthur Flexer, Dominik Schnitzer |
Neurocomputing | 1 |
| 2014 | A Case for Hubness Removal in High-Dimensional Multimedia Retrieval
Dominik Schnitzer, Arthur Flexer, Nenad Tomasev |
ECIR | 2 |
| 2014 | Choosing the Metric in High-Dimensional Spaces Based on Hub Analysis
Dominik Schnitzer, Arthur Flexer |
ESANN | 2 |
| 2014 | An investigation of likelihood normalization for robust ASRabstractInternational audience Emmanuel Vincent 0001, Aggelos Gkiokas, Dominik Schnitzer, Arthur Flexer |
INTERSPEECH | 4 |
| 2014 | Improving Neighborhood-Based Collaborative Filtering by Reducing HubnessabstractFor recommending multimedia items, collaborative filtering (CF) denotes the technique of automatically predicting a user's rating or preference for an item by exploiting item preferences of a (large) group of other users. In traditional memory-based (or neighborhood-based) recommenders, this is accomplished by, first, selecting a number of similar users (or items) and, second, combining their ratings into a single user's predicted rating for an item. Strategies for both defining similarity (i.e., to identify nearest neighbors) and for combining ratings (i.e., to weight their impact) have been extensively studied and even resulted in inconsistent findings. Peter Knees, Dominik Schnitzer, Arthur Flexer |
ICMR | 3 |
| 2013 | The neglected user in music information retrieval researchabstractPersonalization and context-awareness are highly important topics in research on Intelligent Information Systems. In the fields of Music Information Retrieval (MIR) and Music Recommendation in particular, user-centric algorithms should ideally provide music that perfectly fits each individual listener in each imaginable situation and for each of her information or entertainment needs. Even though preliminary steps towards such systems have recently been presented at the “International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference” (ISMIR) and at similar venues, this vision is still far away from becoming a reality. In this article, we investigate and discuss literature on the topic of user-centric music retrieval and reflect on why the breakthrough in this field has not been achieved yet. Given the different expertises of the authors, we shed light on why this topic is a particularly challenging one, taking computer science and psychology points of view. Whereas the computer science aspect centers on the problems of user modeling, machine learning, and evaluation, the psychological discussion is mainly concerned with proper experimental design and interpretation of the results of an experiment. We further present our ideas on aspects crucial to consider when elaborating user-aware music retrieval systems. Markus Schedl, Arthur Flexer, Julián Urbano |
J. Intell. Inf. Syst. | 2 |
| 2012 | Local and global scaling reduce hubs in space
Dominik Schnitzer, Arthur Flexer, Markus Schedl, Gerhard Widmer |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2012 | A fast audio similarity retrieval method for millions of music tracks
Dominik Schnitzer, Arthur Flexer, Gerhard Widmer |
Multim. Tools Appl. | 2 |
| 2009 | On the limitations of browsing top-N recommender systemsabstractTo exploit the enormous potential of niche products, modern information systems must support users in exploring digital libraries and online catalogs. A straight-forward way of doing so is to support browsing the available items, which is in general realized by presenting a user the top-N recommendations for each item. However, recent research indicates that most of the niche products reside in the so-called Long Tail, and simple collaborative filtering-based recommender systems alone do not allow to explore these niche products. In this paper we show that it is not only a popularity problem related to the collaborative filtering approach that makes a portion of the elements of a digital library inaccessible via browsing, but also a consequence of the top N-recommendation approach itself. Klaus Seyerlehner, Arthur Flexer, Gerhard Widmer |
RecSys | 2 |
| 2005 | A reliable probabilistic sleep stager based on a single EEG signal
Arthur Flexer, Georg Gruber, Georg Dorffner |
Artif. Intell. Medicine | 1 |
| 2005 | Using ICA for removal of ocular artifacts in EEG recorded from blind subjects
Arthur Flexer, Herbert Bauer, Jürgen Pripfl, Georg Dorffner |
Neural Networks | 1 |
| 2002 | Continuous Unsupervised Sleep Staging Based on a Single EEG Signal
Arthur Flexer, Georg Gruber, Georg Dorffner |
ICANN | 1 |
| 2001 | Single Trial Estimation of Evoked Potentials Using Gaussian Mixture Models with Integrated Noise Component
Arthur Flexer, Herbert Bauer, Claus Lamm, Georg Dorffner |
ICANN | 1 |
| 2001 | A Probabilistic Approach to High-Resolution Sleep Analysis
Peter Sykacek, Stephen J. Roberts, Iead Rezek, Arthur Flexer, Georg Dorffner |
ICANN | 4 |
| 2001 | On the use of self-organizing maps for clustering and visualization
Arthur Flexer |
Intell. Data Anal. | 1 |
| 2000 | Using Hidden Markov Models to Build an Automatic, Continuous and Probabilistic Sleep StagerabstractWe report about an automatic continuous sleep stager which is based on probabilistic principles employing hidden Markov models (HMMs). Our sleep stager offers the advantage of being objective by not relying on human scorers, having much finer temporal resolution (1 second instead of 30 second): and being based on solid probabilistic principles rather than a predefined set of rules. Results obtained for nine whole night sleep recordings are reported. Arthur Flexer, Peter Sykacek, Georg Dorffner, Iead Rezek |
IJCNN (3) | 1 |
| 2000 | Monitoring human information processing via intelligent data analysis of EEG recordings
Arthur Flexer, Herbert Bauer |
Intell. Data Anal. | 1 |
| 1999 | Monitoring Human Information Processing via Intelligent Data Analysis of EEG Recordings
Arthur Flexer, Herbert Bauer |
IDA | 1 |
| 1999 | On the Use of Self-Organizing Maps for Clustering and Visualization
Arthur Flexer |
PKDD | 1 |
| 1998 | Discovery of Common Subsequences in Cognitive Evoked Potentials
Arthur Flexer, Herbert Bauer |
PKDD | 1 |
| 1996 | Limitations of Self-organizing Maps for Vector Quantization and Multidimensional Scaling
Arthur Flexer |
NIPS | 1 |