VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Priyam Chatterjee
dblp:95/5145
· DBLP profile ↗
12ranked-venue papers
9as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-8303-2395ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 11 · 8 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
8 papers |
Image and video processing · 89% Computational photography and imaging · 11% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Image and video processing › image restoration
image denoising |
1.0 | 6 | 2020 | Burst Denoising via Temporally Shifted Wavelet Transforms · ECCV (13) 2020 Patch-Based Near-Optimal Image Denoising · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2012 Practical Bounds on Image Denoising: From Estimation to Information · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2011 |
Image and video processing › image restoration › image denoising › camera noise removal
burst denoising |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Burst Denoising via Temporally Shifted Wavelet Transforms · ECCV (13) 2020 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation
efficient segmentation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Efficient Segmentation: Learning Downsampling Near Semantic Boundaries · ICCV 2019 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Efficient Segmentation: Learning Downsampling Near Semantic Boundaries · ICCV 2019 |
Image and video processing › image restoration › image denoising
patch-based denoising |
0.2 | 2 | 2012 | Patch-Based Near-Optimal Image Denoising · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2012 Clustering-Based Denoising With Locally Learned Dictionaries · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2009 |
Computational photography and imaging › multi-perspective imaging › multi-camera systems
camera array |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | PiCam: an ultra-thin high performance monolithic camera array · ACM Trans. Graph. 2013 |
Image and video processing
image restoration |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | PiCam: an ultra-thin high performance monolithic camera array · ACM Trans. Graph. 2013 |
Computational photography and imaging › light field imaging
light field capture |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | PiCam: an ultra-thin high performance monolithic camera array · ACM Trans. Graph. 2013 |
Image and video processing
super-resolution |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | PiCam: an ultra-thin high performance monolithic camera array · ACM Trans. Graph. 2013 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
demosaicing |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Noise suppression in low-light images through joint denoising and demosaicing · CVPR 2011 |
Image and video processing › image restoration › demosaicing
joint demosaicing and denoising |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Noise suppression in low-light images through joint denoising and demosaicing · CVPR 2011 |
Image and video processing › image restoration › image denoising › real image denoising
low-light image denoising |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Noise suppression in low-light images through joint denoising and demosaicing · CVPR 2011 |
Image and video processing › image restoration › image denoising › sparse representation based denoising
dictionary learning-based denoising |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Clustering-Based Denoising With Locally Learned Dictionaries · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
learned downsampling · 0.8boundary-aware sampling · 0.8wavelet transform · 0.4mean squared error analysis · 0.3regularized image restoration · 0.2maximum a posteriori estimation · 0.2patch redundancy · 0.1patch redundancy estimation · 0.1color filter array processing · 0.1cluster covariance estimation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Burst Denoising via Temporally Shifted Wavelet Transforms
Xuejian Rong, Denis Demandolx, Kevin Matzen, Priyam Chatterjee, Yingli Tian |
ECCV (13) | 4 |
| 2019 | Efficient Segmentation: Learning Downsampling Near Semantic BoundariesabstractMany automated processes such as auto-piloting rely on a good semantic segmentation as a critical component. To speed up performance, it is common to downsample the input frame. However, this comes at the cost of missed small objects and reduced accuracy at semantic boundaries. To address this problem, we propose a new content-adaptive downsampling technique that learns to favor sampling locations near semantic boundaries of target classes. Cost-performance analysis shows that our method consistently outperforms the uniform sampling improving balance between accuracy and computational efficiency. Our adaptive sampling gives segmentation with better quality of boundaries and more reliable support for smaller-size objects. Dmitrii Marin, Peter Vajda, Priyam Chatterjee, Sam S. Tsai, Yuri Boykov |
ICCV | 4 |
| 2013 | PiCam: an ultra-thin high performance monolithic camera arrayabstractWe presentPiCam(Pelican Imaging Camera-Array), an ultra-thin high performance monolithic camera array, that captures light fields and synthesizes high resolution images along with a range image (scene depth) through integrated parallax detection and superresolution. The camera is passive, supporting both stills and video, low light capable, and small enough to be included in the next generation of mobile devices including smartphones. Prior works [Rander et al. 1997; Yang et al. 2002; Zhang and Chen 2004; Tanida et al. 2001; Tanida et al. 2003; Duparré et al. 2004] in camera arrays have explored multiple facets of light field capture - from viewpoint synthesis, synthetic refocus, computing range images, high speed video, and micro-optical aspects of system miniaturization. However, none of these have addressed the modifications needed to achieve the strict form factor and image quality required to make array cameras practical for mobile devices. In our approach, we customize many aspects of the camera array including lenses, pixels, sensors, and software algorithms to achieve imaging performance and form factor comparable to existing mobile phone cameras. Our contributions to the post-processing of images from camera arrays include a cost function for parallax detection that integrates across multiple color channels, and a regularized image restoration (superresolution) process that takes into account all the system degradations and adapts to a range of practical imaging conditions. The registration uncertainty from the parallax detection process is integrated into a Maximum-a-Posteriori formulation that synthesizes an estimate of the high resolution image and scene depth. We conclude with some examples of our array capabilities such as postcapture (still) refocus, video refocus, view synthesis to demonstrate motion parallax, 3D range images, and briefly address future work. Kartik Venkataraman, Dan Lelescu, Jacques Duparré, Andrew McMahon, Gabriel Molina, Priyam Chatterjee, Robert Mullis, Shree K. Nayar |
ACM Trans. Graph. | 6 |
| 2012 | Patch-Based Near-Optimal Image DenoisingabstractIn this paper, we propose a denoising method motivated by our previous analysis of the performance bounds for image denoising. Insights from that study are used here to derive a high-performance practical denoising algorithm. We propose a patch-based Wiener filter that exploits patch redundancy for image denoising. Our framework uses both geometrically and photometrically similar patches to estimate the different filter parameters. We describe how these parameters can be accurately estimated directly from the input noisy image. Our denoising approach, designed for near-optimal performance (in the mean-squared error sense), has a sound statistical foundation that is analyzed in detail. The performance of our approach is experimentally verified on a variety of images and noise levels. The results presented here demonstrate that our proposed method is on par or exceeding the current state of the art, both visually and quantitatively. Priyam Chatterjee, Peyman Milanfar |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 1 |
| 2011 | Noise suppression in low-light images through joint denoising and demosaicingabstractWe address the effects of noise in low-light images in this paper. Color images are usually captured by a sensor with a color filter array (CFA). This requires a demosaicing process to generate a full color image. The captured images typically have low signal-to-noise ratio, and the demosaicing step further corrupts the image, which we show to be the leading cause of visually objectionable random noise patterns (splotches). To avoid this problem, we propose a combined framework of denoising and demosaicing, where we use information about the image inferred in the denoising step to perform demosaicing. Our experiments show that such a framework results in sharper low-light images that are devoid of splotches and other noise artifacts. Priyam Chatterjee, Neel Joshi, Sing Bing Kang, Yasuyuki Matsushita |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2011 | Patch-based locally optimal denoisingabstractIn our previous work [1], we formulated the fundamental limits of image denoising. In this paper, we propose a practical algorithm where the motivation is to realize a locally optimal denoising filter that achieves the lower bound. The proposed method is a patch-based Wiener filter that takes advantage of both geometrically and photometrically similar patches. The resultant approach has a nice statistical foundation while producing denoising results that are comparable to or exceeding the current state-of-the-art, both visually and quantitatively. Priyam Chatterjee, Peyman Milanfar |
ICIP | 1 |
| 2011 | Practical Bounds on Image Denoising: From Estimation to InformationabstractRecently, in a previous work, we proposed a way to bound how well any given image can be denoised. The bound was computed directly from the noise-free image that was assumed to be available. In this work, we extend the formulation to the more practical case where no ground truth is available. We show that the parameters of the bounds, namely the cluster covariances and level of redundancy for patches in the image, can be estimated directly from the noise corrupted image. Further, we analyze the bounds formulation to show that these two parameters are interdependent and they, along with the bounds formulation as a whole, have a nice information-theoretic interpretation as well. The results are verified through a variety of well-motivated experiments. Priyam Chatterjee, Peyman Milanfar |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 1 |
| 2010 | Fundamental limits of image denoising: Are we there yet?abstractIn this paper, we study the fundamental performance limits of image denoising where the aim is to recover the original image from its noisy observation. Our study is based on a general class of estimators whose bias can be modeled to be affine. A bound on the performance in terms of mean squared error (MSE) of the recovered image is derived in a Bayesian framework. In this work, we assume that the original image is available, from which we learn the image statistics. Performances of some current state-of-the-art methods are compared to our MSE bounds for some commonly used experimental images. These show that some gain in denoising performance is yet to be achieved. Priyam Chatterjee, Peyman Milanfar |
ICASSP | 1 |
| 2010 | Learning denoising bounds for noisy imagesabstractIn [1], we derived an expression for the fundamental limit to image denoising assuming that the noise-free image is available. In this paper, we propose an estimator for the bound on the mean squared error given only the noisy image and noise characteristics. To do this, we make use of an assortment of independently collected noise-free images from which prior information about the noisy image is learned. We show that even for reasonably low input signal-to-noise levels, our method can predict the denoising bound with accuracy. Priyam Chatterjee, Peyman Milanfar |
ICIP | 1 |
| 2010 | Is Denoising Dead?abstractImage denoising has been a well studied problem in the field of image processing. Yet researchers continue to focus attention on it to better the current state-of-the-art. Recently proposed methods take different approaches to the problem and yet their denoising performances are comparable. A pertinent question then to ask is whether there is a theoretical limit to denoising performance and, more importantly, are we there yet? As camera manufacturers continue to pack increasing numbers of pixels per unit area, an increase in noise sensitivity manifests itself in the form of a noisier image. We study the performance bounds for the image denoising problem. Our work in this paper estimates a lower bound on the mean squared error of the denoised result and compares the performance of current state-of-the-art denoising methods with this bound. We show that despite the phenomenal recent progress in the quality of denoising algorithms, some room for improvement still remains for a wide class of general images, and at certain signal-to-noise levels. Therefore, image denoising is not dead--yet. Priyam Chatterjee, Peyman Milanfar |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 1 |
| 2009 | Application Of Papoulis-Gerchberg Method In Image Super-Resolution and InpaintingabstractIn this paper, we study the Papoulis–Gerchberg (PG) method and its applications to domains of image restoration such as super-resolution (SR) and inpainting. We show that the method performs well under certain conditions. We then suggest improvements to the method to achieve better SR and inpainting results. The modification applied to the SR process also allows us to apply the method to a larger class of images by doing away with some of the restrictions inherent in the classical PG method. We also present results to demonstrate the performance of the proposed techniques. Priyam Chatterjee, Sujata Mukherjee, Subhasis Chaudhuri, Guna Seetharaman |
Comput. J. | 1 |
| 2009 | Clustering-Based Denoising With Locally Learned DictionariesabstractIn this paper, we propose K-LLD: a patch-based, locally adaptive denoising method based on clustering the given noisy image into regions of similar geometric structure. In order to effectively perform such clustering, we employ as features the local weight functions derived from our earlier work on steering kernel regression . These weights are exceedingly informative and robust in conveying reliable local structural information about the image even in the presence of significant amounts of noise. Next, we model each region (or cluster)-which may not be spatially contiguous-by "learning" a best basis describing the patches within that cluster using principal components analysis. This learned basis (or "dictionary") is then employed to optimally estimate the underlying pixel values using a kernel regression framework. An iterated version of the proposed algorithm is also presented which leads to further performance enhancements. We also introduce a novel mechanism for optimally choosing the local patch size for each cluster using Stein's unbiased risk estimator (SURE). We illustrate the overall algorithm's capabilities with several examples. These indicate that the proposed method appears to be competitive with some of the most recently published state of the art denoising methods. Priyam Chatterjee, Peyman Milanfar |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 1 |