Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Carl Harris

dblp:95/5332 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 33% Vision and language · 33% Efficient and distributed learning · 33%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
missing modality handling
0.812024
FuseMoE: Mixture-of-Experts Transformers for Fleximodal Fusion · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
mixture of experts
0.812024
FuseMoE: Mixture-of-Experts Transformers for Fleximodal Fusion · NeurIPS 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal fusion
0.812024
FuseMoE: Mixture-of-Experts Transformers for Fleximodal Fusion · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transformer · 0.8mixture of experts · 0.8gating function · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 FuseMoE: Mixture-of-Experts Transformers for Fleximodal Fusion
abstract
As machine learning models in critical fields increasingly grapple with multimodal data, they face the dual challenges of handling a wide array of modalities, often incomplete due to missing elements, and the temporal irregularity and sparsity of collected samples. Successfully leveraging this complex data, while overcoming the scarcity of high-quality training samples, is key to improving these models' predictive performance. We introduce ``FuseMoE'', a mixture-of-experts framework incorporated with an innovative gating function. Designed to integrate a diverse number of modalities, FuseMoE is effective in managing scenarios with missing modalities and irregularly sampled data trajectories. Theoretically, our unique gating function contributes to enhanced convergence rates, leading to better performance in multiple downstream tasks. The practical utility of FuseMoE in the real world is validated by a diverse set of challenging prediction tasks.
Xing Han, Carl Harris, Nhat Ho, Suchi Saria
NeurIPS3
2004 Were the good old days all that good?: EDA then and now
abstract
A long, long time ago, in a laboratory far, far away, EDA researchers and developers used paper tape instead of Linux, rubylith instead of GDS II, yellow wires instead of ten levels of metal. Sitting around a potbellied stove, in their rocking chairs, practitioners of that era (and this) will offer insight into why some great ideas were immediately put into practice while others stayed on the drawing board or in the ivory tower. They will share remembrances of things past, of simpler days when foundries made steel, when options meant CMOS or bipolar, when real parts were measured instead of benchmarks touted. Their stories of what it was like, what has changed, and whether the "good old days" were then or now will be followed by questions and, possibly, answers.
Shishpal Rawat, William H. Joyner Jr., John A. Darringer, Daniel Gajski, Pat O. Pistilli, Hugo De Man, Carl Harris, James Solomon
DAC7