Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nicole Krämer 0002

dblp:95/5664 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
0000-0002-8209-9141ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Learning theory · 54% Graph learning · 25% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 21%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › nonparametric regression
kernel regression
0.112010
Optimal learning rates for Kernel Conjugate Gradient regression · NIPS 2010
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical learning theory
0.112010
Optimal learning rates for Kernel Conjugate Gradient regression · NIPS 2010
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph analytics
graph mining
0.112008
Partial least squares regression for graph mining · KDD 2008
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph inference › graph prediction
graph regression
0.112008
Partial least squares regression for graph mining · KDD 2008
Machine learning › Learning theory › model selection
cross-validation
0.112007
Kernelizing PLS, degrees of freedom, and efficient model selection · ICML 2007
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods
0.112007
Kernelizing PLS, degrees of freedom, and efficient model selection · ICML 2007
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods
kernel partial least squares
0.112007
Kernelizing PLS, degrees of freedom, and efficient model selection · ICML 2007
Machine learning › Learning theory
model selection
0.112007
Kernelizing PLS, degrees of freedom, and efficient model selection · ICML 2007
Mathematical optimization › iterative methods
conjugate gradient method
0.012010
Optimal learning rates for Kernel Conjugate Gradient regression · NIPS 2010
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.012010
Optimal learning rates for Kernel Conjugate Gradient regression · NIPS 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

kernel partial least squares · 0.2early stopping · 0.2conjugate gradient · 0.2weighted pattern mining · 0.1sparse PLS · 0.1partial least squares regression · 0.1kernel ridge regression · 0.1degrees of freedom estimation · 0.1conjugate gradient descent · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Optimal learning rates for Kernel Conjugate Gradient regression
abstract
We prove rates of convergence in the statistical sense for kernel-based least squares regression using a conjugate gradient algorithm, where regularization against overfitting is obtained by early stopping. This method is directly related to Kernel Partial Least Squares, a regression method that combines supervised dimensionality reduction with least squares projection. The rates depend on two key quantities: first, on the regularity of the target regression function and second, on the effective dimensionality of the data mapped into the kernel space. Lower bounds on attainable rates depending on these two quantities were established in earlier literature, and we obtain upper bounds for the considered method that match these lower bounds (up to a log factor) if the true regression function belongs to the reproducing kernel Hilbert space. If the latter assumption is not fulfilled, we obtain similar convergence rates provided additional unlabeled data are available. The order of the learning rates in these two situations match state-of-the-art results that were recently obtained for the least squares support vector machine and for linear regularization operators.
Gilles Blanchard, Nicole Krämer 0002
NIPS2
2009 The Feature Importance Ranking Measure
Alexander Zien, Nicole Krämer 0002, Sören Sonnenburg, Gunnar Rätsch
ECML/PKDD (2)2
2009 Regularized estimation of large-scale gene association networks using graphical Gaussian models
abstract
BACKGROUND: Graphical Gaussian models are popular tools for the estimation of (undirected) gene association networks from microarray data. A key issue when the number of variables greatly exceeds the number of samples is the estimation of the matrix of partial correlations. Since the (Moore-Penrose) inverse of the sample covariance matrix leads to poor estimates in this scenario, standard methods are inappropriate and adequate regularization techniques are needed. Popular approaches include biased estimates of the covariance matrix and high-dimensional regression schemes, such as the Lasso and Partial Least Squares. RESULTS: In this article, we investigate a general framework for combining regularized regression methods with the estimation of Graphical Gaussian models. This framework includes various existing methods as well as two new approaches based on ridge regression and adaptive lasso, respectively. These methods are extensively compared both qualitatively and quantitatively within a simulation study and through an application to six diverse real data sets. In addition, all proposed algorithms are implemented in the R package "parcor", available from the R repository CRAN. CONCLUSION: In our simulation studies, the investigated non-sparse regression methods, i.e. Ridge Regression and Partial Least Squares, exhibit rather conservative behavior when combined with (local) false discovery rate multiple testing in order to decide whether or not an edge is present in the network. For networks with higher densities, the difference in performance of the methods decreases. For sparse networks, we confirm the Lasso's well known tendency towards selecting too many edges, whereas the two-stage adaptive Lasso is an interesting alternative that provides sparser solutions. In our simulations, both sparse and non-sparse methods are able to reconstruct networks with cluster structures. On six real data sets, we also clearly distinguish the results obtained using the non-sparse methods and those obtained using the sparse methods where specification of the regularization parameter automatically means model selection. In five out of six data sets, Partial Least Squares selects very dense networks. Furthermore, for data that violate the assumption of uncorrelated observations (due to replications), the Lasso and the adaptive Lasso yield very complex structures, indicating that they might not be suited under these conditions. The shrinkage approach is more stable than the regression based approaches when using subsampling.
Nicole Krämer 0002, Juliane Schäfer, Anne-Laure Boulesteix
BMC Bioinform.1
2009 Time Domain Parameters as a feature for EEG-based Brain-Computer Interfaces
Carmen Vidaurre, Nicole Krämer 0002, Benjamin Blankertz, Alois Schlögl
Neural Networks2
2008 Partial least squares regression for graph mining
abstract
Attributed graphs are increasingly more common in many application domains such as chemistry, biology and text processing. A central issue in graph mining is how to collect informative subgraph patterns for a given learning task. We propose an iterative mining method based on partial least squares regression (PLS). To apply PLS to graph data, a sparse version of PLS is developed first and then it is combined with a weighted pattern mining algorithm. The mining algorithm is iteratively called with different weight vectors, creating one latent component per one mining call. Our method, graph PLS, is efficient and easy to implement, because the weight vector is updated with elementary matrix calculations. In experiments, our graph PLS algorithm showed competitive prediction accuracies in many chemical datasets and its efficiency was significantly superior to graph boosting (gBoost) and the naive method based on frequent graph mining.
Hiroto Saigo, Nicole Krämer 0002, Koji Tsuda
KDD2
2007 Kernelizing PLS, degrees of freedom, and efficient model selection
abstract
Kernelizing partial least squares (PLS), an algorithm which has been particularly popular in chemometrics, leads to kernel PLS which has several interesting properties, including a sub-cubic runtime for learning, and an iterative construction of directions which are relevant for predicting the outputs. We show that the kernelization of PLS introduces interesting properties not found in ordinary PLS, giving novel insights into the workings of kernel PLS and the connections to kernel ridge regression and conjugate gradient descent methods. Furthermore, we show how to correctly define the degrees of freedom for kernel PLS and how to efficiently compute an unbiased estimate. Finally, we address the practical problem of model selection. We demonstrate how to use the degrees of freedom estimate to perform effective model selection, and discuss how to implement crossvalidation schemes efficiently.
Nicole Krämer 0002, Mikio L. Braun
ICML1