VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ajay N. Jain
dblp:95/5841
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
0000-0003-4641-8501ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
3D vision · 20% Image recognition and object detection · 20% Language models and text generation · 15% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems bioinformatics
pathway analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Pathway recognition and augmentation by computational analysis of microarray expression data · Bioinform. 2006 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
regulatory genomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A deterministic motif finding algorithm with application to the human genome · Bioinform. 2006 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › motif discovery
transcription factor binding motif discovery |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A deterministic motif finding algorithm with application to the human genome · Bioinform. 2006 |
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms › string algorithms
string indexing |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A deterministic motif finding algorithm with application to the human genome · Bioinform. 2006 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › differential expression analysis
differentially expressed gene identification |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Deriving quantitative conclusions from microarray expression data · Bioinform. 2002 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Deriving quantitative conclusions from microarray expression data · Bioinform. 2002 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
sample classification |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Deriving quantitative conclusions from microarray expression data · Bioinform. 2002 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d shape analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | A Comparison of Dynamic Reposing and Tangent Distance for Drug Activity Prediction · NIPS 1993 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
tangent distance |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | A Comparison of Dynamic Reposing and Tangent Distance for Drug Activity Prediction · NIPS 1993 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery › bioactivity prediction
drug activity prediction |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | A Comparison of Dynamic Reposing and Tangent Distance for Drug Activity Prediction · NIPS 1993 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding
neural parsing |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Generalization Performance in PARSEC - A Structured Connectionist Parsing Architecture · NIPS 1991 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › speech translation
speech-to-speech translation |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | JANUS: Speech-to-Speech Translation Using Connectionist and Non-Connectionist Techniques · NIPS 1991 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
incremental parsing |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Incremental Parsing by Modular Recurrent Connectionist Networks · NIPS 1989 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Incremental Parsing by Modular Recurrent Connectionist Networks · NIPS 1989 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Generalization Performance in PARSEC - A Structured Connectionist Parsing Architecture · NIPS 1991 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
indexing-based search · 0.1permutation analysis · 0.1optimization · 0.1microarray expression analysis · 0.1permutation test · 0.0k-nearest neighbor · 0.0tangent distance · 0.0dynamic reposing · 0.0connectionist techniques · 0.0connectionist network · 0.0modular recurrent connectionist networks · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | A deterministic motif finding algorithm with application to the human genomeabstractAbstract Motivation: We present a novel algorithm, MaMF, for identifying transcription factor (TF) binding site motifs. The method is deterministic and depends on an indexing technique to optimize the search process. On common yeast datasets, MaMF performs competitively with other methods. We also present results on a challenging group of eight sets of human genes known to be responsive to a diverse group of TFs. In every case, MaMF finds the annotated motif among the top scoring putative motifs. We compared MaMF against other motif finders on a larger human group of 21 gene sets and found that MaMF performs better than other algorithms. We analyzed the remaining high scoring motifs and show that many correspond to other TFs that are known to co-occur with the annotated TF motifs. The significant and frequent presence of co-occurring transcription factor binding sites explains in part the difficulty of human motif finding. MaMF is a very fast algorithm, suitable for application to large numbers of interesting gene sets. Availability: The software is available for academic research use free of charge by email request. Contact: [email protected] Supplemental information: Data comprising the benchmarks used in the paper may be downloaded from . Lawrence S. Hon, Ajay N. Jain |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2006 | Pathway recognition and augmentation by computational analysis of microarray expression dataabstractMOTIVATION: We present a system, QPACA (Quantitative Pathway Analysis in Cancer) for analysis of biological data in the context of pathways. QPACA supports data visualization and both fine- and coarse-grained specifications, but, more importantly, addresses the problems of pathway recognition and pathway augmentation. RESULTS: Given a set of genes hypothesized to be part of a pathway or a coordinated process, QPACA is able to reliably distinguish true pathways from non-pathways using microarray expression data. Relying on the observation that only some of the experiments within a dataset are relevant to a specific biochemical pathway, QPACA automates selection of this subset using an optimization procedure. We present data on all human and yeast pathways found in the KEGG pathway database. In 117 out of 191 cases (61%), QPACA was able to correctly identify these positive cases as bona fide pathways with p-values measured using rigorous permutation analysis. Success in recognizing pathways was dependent on pathway size, with the largest quartile of pathways yielding 83% success. In cross-validation tests of pathway membership prediction, QPACA was able to yield enrichments for predicted pathway genes over random genes at rates of 2-fold or better the majority of the time, with rates of 10-fold or better 10-20% of the time. AVAILABILITY: The software is available for academic research use free of charge by email request. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Data used in the paper may be downloaded from http://www.jainlab.org/downloads.html Barbara A. Novak, Ajay N. Jain |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2002 | Deriving quantitative conclusions from microarray expression dataabstractMOTIVATION: The last few years have seen the development of DNA microarray technology that allows simultaneous measurement of the expression levels of thousands of genes. While many methods have been developed to analyze such data, most have been visualization-based. Methods that yield quantitative conclusions have been diverse and complex. RESULTS: We present two straightforward methods for identifying specific genes whose expression is linked with a phenotype or outcome variable as well as for systematically predicting sample class membership: (1) a conservative, permutation-based approach to identifying differentially expressed genes; (2) an augmentation of K-nearest-neighbor pattern classification. Our analyses replicate the quantitative conclusions of Golub et al. (1999; Science, 286, 531-537) on leukemia data, with better classification results, using far simpler methods. With the breast tumor data of Perou et al. (2000; Nature, 406, 747-752), the methods lend rigorous quantitative support to the conclusions of the original paper. In the case of the lymphoma data in Alizadeh et al. (2000; Nature, 403, 503-511), our analyses only partially support the conclusions of the original authors. AVAILABILITY: The software and supplementary information are available freely to researchers at academic and non-profit institutions at http://cc.ucsf.edu/jain/public Adam B. Olshen, Ajay N. Jain |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 1993 | A Comparison of Dynamic Reposing and Tangent Distance for Drug Activity Prediction
Thomas G. Dietterich, Ajay N. Jain, Richard H. Lathrop, Tomás Lozano-Pérez |
NIPS | 2 |
| 1992 | PARSEC: a structured connectionist parsing system for spoken languageabstractThe authors present PARSEC-a system for generating connectionist parsing networks from example parses. PARSEC is not based on formal grammar systems and has been geared towards spoken language tasks. PARSEC networks exhibit three strengths important for application to speech processing: they learn to parse, and generalize well compared to hand-coded grammars; they tolerate several types of noise; and they can learn to use multimodal input. The authors also present the PARSEC architecture, its training algorithms, and performance analyses along several dimensions that demonstrate PARSEC's features. They compare PARSEC's performance to that of traditional grammar-based parsing systems.> Ajay N. Jain, Alex Waibel, David S. Touretzky |
ICASSP | 1 |
| 1991 | JANUS: a speech-to-speech translation system using connectionist and symbolic processing strategiesabstractThe authors present JANUS, a speech-to-speech translation system that utilizes diverse processing strategies including dynamic programming, stochastic techniques, connectionist learning, and traditional AI knowledge representation approaches. JANUS translates continuously spoken English utterances into Japanese and German speech utterances. The overall system performance on a corpus of conference registration conversations is 87%. Two versions of JANUS are compared: one using a LR parser (JANUS 1) and one using a connectionist parser (JANUS 2). Performance results were mixed, with JANUS 1 deriving benefit from a tighter language model and JANUS 2 benefitting from greater flexibility.> Alex Waibel, Ajay N. Jain, Arthur E. McNair, Hiroaki Saito 0001, Alex Hauptmann 0001, Joe Tebelskis |
ICASSP | 2 |
| 1991 | Generalization Performance in PARSEC - A Structured Connectionist Parsing Architecture
Ajay N. Jain |
NIPS | 1 |
| 1991 | JANUS: Speech-to-Speech Translation Using Connectionist and Non-Connectionist Techniques
Alex Waibel, Ajay N. Jain, Arthur E. McNair, Joe Tebelskis, Louise Osterholtz, Hiroaki Saito 0001, Otto Schmidbauer, Tilo Sloboda, Monika Woszczyna |
NIPS | 2 |
| 1991 | Parsing Complex Sentences with Structured Connectionist NetworksabstractA modular, recurrent connectionist network is taught to incrementally parse complex sentences. From input presented one word at a time, the network learns to do semantic role assignment, noun phrase attachment, and clause structure recognition, for sentences with both active and passive constructions and center-embedded clauses. The network makes syntactic and semantic predictions at every step. Previous predictions are revised as expectations are confirmed or violated with the arrival of new information. The network induces its own "grammar rules" for dynamically transforming an input sequence of words into a syntactic/semantic interpretation. The network generalizes well and is tolerant of ill-formed inputs. Ajay N. Jain |
Neural Comput. | 1 |
| 1990 | Robust connectionist parsing of spoken languageabstractA modular, recurrent connectionist network architecture which learns to robustly perform incremental parsing of complex sentences is presented. From sequential input, one word at a time, the networks learn to do semantic role assignment, noun phrase attachment, and clause structure recognition for sentences with passive constructions and center embedded clauses. The networks make syntactic and semantic predictions at every point in time, and previous predictions are revised as expectations are affirmed or violated with the arrival of new information. The networks induce their own grammar rules for dynamically transforming an input sequence of words into a syntactic/semantic interpretation. These networks generalize and display tolerance to input which has been corrupted in ways common in spoken language.> Ajay N. Jain, Alex Waibel |
ICASSP | 1 |
| 1989 | Incremental Parsing by Modular Recurrent Connectionist Networks
Ajay N. Jain, Alex Waibel |
NIPS | 1 |