Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
K. Ranga R. Krishnan
dblp:95/7226
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
0000-0002-3661-8449ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › medical image analysis
lesion detection |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Neural network methods for volumetric magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain · Proc. IEEE 1996 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
medical image analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Neural network methods for volumetric magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain · Proc. IEEE 1996 |
Medical and health informatics › neuroimaging
morphometric analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Neural network methods for volumetric magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain · Proc. IEEE 1996 |
Medical and health informatics › neuroimaging
neuroimaging analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Neural network methods for volumetric magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain · Proc. IEEE 1996 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
recurrent neural network · 0.0artificial neural network · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | Neural network methods for volumetric magnetic resonance imaging of the human brainabstractBrain magnetic resonance (MR) images contain massive information requiring lengthy and complex interpretation (as in the identification of significant portions of the image), quantitative evaluation (as in the determination of the size of certain significant regions), and sophisticated interpretation (as in determining any image portions which indicate signs of lesions or of disease). In this paper we first survey the clinical and research needs for brain imaging. We present the state-of-the-art in relevant image analysis techniques. We then discuss our recent work on the use of novel artificial neural networks which have a recurrent structure to extract precise morphometric information from MRI scans of the human brain. Finally, experimental data using our novel approach is presented and suggestions are made for future research. Erol Gelenbe, Yutao Feng, K. Ranga R. Krishnan |
Proc. IEEE | 3 |