Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

J. Alicia Grice

dblp:95/932 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence alignment
0.021997
Reduced space sequence alignment · Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1997
Parallel Sequence Alignment in Limited Space · ISMB 1995
Bioinformatics and computational biology › multiple sequence alignment
parallel sequence alignment
0.011997
Reduced space sequence alignment · Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1997
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel algorithms
0.011995
Parallel Sequence Alignment in Limited Space · ISMB 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

parallel sequence alignment · 0.0hidden markov model · 0.0divide-and-conquer · 0.0baum-welch training · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 Reduced space sequence alignment
abstract
MOTIVATION: Sequence alignment is the problem of finding the optimal character-by-character correspondence between two sequences. It can be readily solved in O(n2) time and O(n2) space on a serial machine, or in O(n) time with O(n) space per O(n) processing elements on a parallel machine. Hirschberg's divide-and-conquer approach for finding the single best path reduces space use by a factor of n while inducing only a small constant slowdown to the serial version. RESULTS: This paper presents a family of methods for computing sequence alignments with reduced memory that are well suited to serial or parallel implementation. Unlike the divide-and-conquer approach, they can be used in the forward-backward (Baum-Welch) training of linear hidden Markov models, and they avoid data-dependent repartitioning, making them easier to parallelize. The algorithms feature, for an arbitrary integer L, a factor proportional to L slowdown in exchange for reducing space requirement from O(n2) to O(n1 square root of n). A single best path member of this algorithm family matches the quadratic time and linear space of the divide-and-conquer algorithm. Experimentally, the O(n1.5)-space member of the family is 15-40% faster than the O(n)-space divide-and-conquer algorithm.
J. Alicia Grice, Richard Hughey, Don Speck
Comput. Appl. Biosci.1
1995 Parallel Sequence Alignment in Limited Space
J. Alicia Grice, Richard Hughey, Don Speck
ISMB1